Sovereign power beyond the state: A critical reappraisal of governance by networks

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-114

  Larsson, Oscar L ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

governance by networks; metagovernance of networks; sovereign power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880928491     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.784624     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Ansell, C. and Gash, A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18 (4): 543-571.
3. Arendt, H. 1970. On violence, New York: Harcourt, Brace.
4. Bailey, D. 2006. Governance or the crisis of governmentality? Applying critical state theory at the European level. Journal of European public policy, 13 (1): 16-33.
5. Bartelson, J. 1995. A genealogy of sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bartelson, J. 2001. The critique of the state, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bartelson, J. 2010. " Double binds ". In Sovereignty in fragments: the past, present and future of a contested concept, Edited by: Kalmo, H. and Skinner, Q. 81-95. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic governance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Buller, J. and Flinders, M. 2005. The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy 1. British journal of politics and international relations, 7 (4): 526-543.
10. Burnham, P. 2001. New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation. British journal of politics and international relations, 3 (2): 127-149.
11. Dean, M. 2007. Governing societies: political perspectives on domestic and international rule, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12. Donahue, D.J. and Zeckhauser, J.R. 2006. " Public-private collaborations ". In The Oxford handbook of public policy, Edited by: Moran, M., Rein, M. and Goodin, R. E. 496-528. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Foley, M.W. and Edwards, B. 1996. The paradox of civil society. Journal of democracy, 7 (3): 38-52.
14. Follesdal, A. 2011. The legitimacy challenges for new modes of governance: trustworthy responsiveness. Government and opposition, 46 (1): 81-100.
15. Guzzini, S. 2005. The concept of power: a constructivist analysis. Millennium-journal of international studies, 33 (3): 495-521.
16. Haas, P.M. 1992. Epistemic communities and international-policy coordination-introduction. International organization, 46 (1): 1-35.
17. Hajer, M. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy sciences, 36 (2): 175-195.
18. Haugaard, M. 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European journal of social theory, 6 (1): 87-113.
19. Hay, C. 2002. Political analysis: a critical introduction, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
20. Hay, C. 2007. Why we hate politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Heclo, H. 2010. Issue networks and the executive establishment. Public administration: concepts and cases: 413-421. R.J. Stillman, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning
22. Held, D. and McGrew, A.G. 2007. Globalization/anti-globalization: beyond the great divide, 2nd, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Héritier, A. and Lehmkuhl, D. 2010. New modes of governance and democratic accountability. Government and opposition, 46 (1): 126-144.
24. Hewitt de Alcántara, C. 1998. Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. International social science journal, 50 (155): 105-113.
25. Hindess, B. 1996. Discourses of power: from Hobbes to Foucault, Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Hirst, P. 2000. " Democracy and governance ". In Debating governance: [authority, steering, and democracy], Edited by: Pierre, J. 13-35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Hoffman, J. and Graham, P. 2009. Introduction to political theory, 2nd, UK and New York: Pearson Longman. Harlow
28. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American political science review, 97 (2): 233-243.
29. Jessop, B. 1998. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International social science journal, 50 (1) 29ff
30. Jessop, B. 2009. Redesigning the state, reorienting state power and rethinking the state, Edited by: Kevin, L.T. and Craig, J.J. 41-61. New York: Handbook of politics: state and society in global perspective. Springer
31. Kjaer, A. 2004. Governance, Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
32. Kjaer, A. 2011. Rhodes' contribution to governance theory: praise, criticism and the future governance debate. Public administration, 89 (1): 101-113.
33. Kooiman, J. 2000. " Societal governance: levels, models and orders of social-political interaction ". In Debating governance: [authority, steering, and democracy], Edited by: Pierre, J. 133-166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Kooiman, J. and Jentoft, S. 2009. Meta-governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public administration, 87 (4): 818-836.
35. Kooiman, J. and van Vliet, M. 1993. " Governance and public management ". In Managing public organisations 2nd, Edited by: Eliassen, K. and Kooiman, J. 104-136. London: Sage.
36. Krasner, S.D. 1999. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ and Chichester, UK: Princeton University Press.
37. Kurtulus, E.N. 2005. State sovereignty: concept, phenomenon and ramifications, New York and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Lasswell, H.D. 1936. Politics: who gets what, when, how, New York: Smith.
39. Leftwich, A. 2004. " Thinking politically: on the politics of politics ". In What is politics? The activity and its study, Edited by: Leftwich, A. 1-22. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40. Loughlin, M. 2006. " Ten tenets of sovereignty ". In Relocating sovereignty: the international library of essays in law and legal theory, 2nd series, Edited by: Walker, N. 79-110. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Dartmouth.
41. MacCormick, N. 2001. Questioning sovereignty: law, state, and nation in the European commonwealth, 151-168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. MacCormick, N. 2010. " Sovereignty and after ". In Sovereignty in fragments: the past, present and future of a contested concept, Edited by: Kalmo, H. and Skinner, Q. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Marsh, D. 2011. The new orthodoxy: the differentiated polity model. Public administration, 89 (1): 32-48.
44. Mathur, N. and Skelcher, C. 2007. Evaluating democratic performance: methodologies for assessing the relationship between network governance and citizens. Public administration review, 67 (2): 228-237.
45. Öberg, P. 2011. Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia. Government and opposition, 46 (3): 365-391.
46. Pierre, J. 2000. Debating governance: [authority, steering, and democracy], Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Pierre, J. and Peters, B.G. 2000. Governance, politics and the state, Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's.
48. Prokhovnik, R. 2007. Sovereignties: contemporary theory and practice, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Rees, W.J. 1950. IV-The theory of sovereignty restated. Mind, 59 (236): 495-521.
50. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
51. Rhodes, R.A.W. 2000. " Governance and public administration ". In Debating governance: [authority, steering, and democracy], Edited by: Pierre, J. 54-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Rhodes, R.A.W. and Marsh, D. 1992. New directions in the study of policy networks. European journal of political research, 21 (1-2): 181-205.
53. Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C. 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach, Boulder, CO: Westview.
54. Sartori, G. 2009. Concepts and method in social science: the tradition of Giovanni Sartori, Edited by: Collier, D. and Gerring, J. New York and London: Routledge.
55. Schmitt, C. 1985. Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality, London: Allen Lane.
57. Skelcher, C. 2000. Changing images of the state: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public policy and administration, 15 (3): 3-19.
58. Smismans, S. 2008. New modes of governance and the participatory myth. West European politics, 31 (5): 874-895.
59. Sorensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2005. The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian political studies, 28 (3): 195-218.
60. Sorensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public administration, 87 (2): 234-258.
61. Stehr, N. and Ericson, V.R. 2000. " Introduction ". In Governing modern societies, Edited by: Stehr, N. and Ericson, V.R. 1-25. Toronto: University of Toronto.
62. Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory: five propositions. International social science journal, 50 (155): 17-28.
63. Troper, M. 2010. " The survival of sovereignty ". In Sovereignty in fragments: the past, present and future of a contested concept, Edited by: Kalmo, H. and Skinner, Q. 132-150. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Walker, N. 2006. Relocating sovereignty, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Dartmouth.
65. Walker, R.B.J. 1991. State sovereignty and the articulation of political space-time. Millennium-journal of international studies, 20 (3): 445-461.
66. Walker, R.B.J. 2010. After the globe, before the world, London: Routledge.
67. Walters, W. 2004. Some critical notes on 'governance'. Studies in political economy, 73: 27-46.
68. Weale, A. 2011. New modes of governance, political accountability and public reason. Government and opposition, 46 (1): 58-80.