Ten tenets of sovereignty

Relocating Sovereignty

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 79-114

  Loughlin, Martin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085818945     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781351150361-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (152)

1. Francis W. Coker, ‘The Technique of the Pluralist State’ (1921) 15 American Political Science Review 186-213.
2. Ernest Barker, ‘The Discredited State’ (1915) 5 Political Quarterly 101-21, at 120;
3. Harold J Laski, The Foundations of Sovereignty and other essays (London, Allen and Unwin, 1921) 157.
4. Cf Joshua Cohen and Charles Sabel, ‘Directly Deliberative Polyarchy’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 313-42;
5. Oliver Gerstenberg, ‘Law’s Polyarchy: A Comment on Cohen and Sabel’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 343-58.
6. WJ Rees, ‘The Theory of Sovereignty Restated’ (1950) 59 Mind 495-521, at 495.
7. Stanley I Benn, ‘The Uses of “Sovereignty”' (1955) 3 Political Studies, 109-22, at 122
8. Henry Shue, ‘Eroding Sovereignty: The Advance of Principle’ in Robert McKim and Jeff McMahon (eds), The Morality of Nationalism (New York, Oxford University Press, 1997), 340-59;
9. Richard Falk, ‘Evasions of Sovereignty’ in RBJ Walker and Saul H Mendlovitz (eds), Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Comm unity (Boulder, Colorado, Lynne Rienner, 1990), 61-78.
10. Thomas J Biersteker and Cynthia Weber (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construction (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
11. Charles Loyseau, Traicté des Seigneuries (Paris, Abel l’Angelier, 1614), II. 4: ‘la Souveraineté est du tout inseparable de l’Etat’
12. Walter Ullmann, ‘The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty’ (1949) 64 English Historical Review 1;
13. JW McKenna, ‘The myth of parliamentary sovereignty in latemedieval England’ (1979) 94 English Historical Review 481.
14. Bertrand de Jouvenel, Sovereignty: A n Inquiry into the Political G ood JF Huntington trans. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1957), 171.
15. Jouvenel, Sovereignty: A n Inquiry into the Political G ood JF Huntington trans. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1957), 173.
16. WL Warren, The Governance of N orm an and Angevin England, 1086-1272 (London, Edward Arnold, 1987);
17. James Campbell ‘The Significance of the Anglo-Norman State in the Administrative History of Western Europe’ in His Essays in Anglo-Saxon History (London, Hambledon Press, 1986), ch 11.
18. Wolfgang Reinhard (ed.), Power Elites and State Building (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996);
19. Thomas Ertman, Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997), chs 2,3,5.
20. Gaines Post, Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State, 1100-1322 (Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 1964), 453-82.
21. Peter N. Riesenberg, Inalienability of Sovereignty in Medieval Political Thought (New York, Columbia University Press, 1956), 82-83.
22. Walter Ullmann, ‘This Realm of England is an Empire’ (1979) 30 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 175-203.
23. Bernard Durand, ‘Royal Power and its Legal Instruments in France, 1500-1800' wAntonio Padoa-Schioppa (ed.), Legislation and Justice (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997) 291-312, at 293.
24. Digest of Justinian, 1.4.1.
25. Michael Oakeshott, ‘On the Character of a Modern European State’ in His On Human Conduct (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975), 182-326, at 229.
26. Blandine Kriegel, The State and the Rule of Law Marc A LePain and Jeffrey C Cohen trans. (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995), 29.
27. Kriegel, The State and the Rule of Law Marc A LePain and Jeffrey C Cohen trans. (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995) ch 2.
28. Emile Boutmy, The English Constitution isabel M. Eaden trans. (London, Macmillan, 1891), 10.
29. Jean Bodin, Six livres de la république, Bk. I, esp. chs. 8-10.
30. Charles Loyseau, A Treatise of Orders and Plain Dignities [1610] Howell A. Lloyd trans. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994), VII. 2, 14 (pp. 138, 141-2)
31. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan [1651] Richard Tuck ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996), 125.
32. John Locke, Two Treatises of G overnment, II, §§ 28, 124.
33. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works (Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1969), vol. 1, 16-80, at 77.
34. Martin Carnoy, The State and Political Theory (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1984).
35. Charles A. Beard, An Economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States [1913] (New York, Macmillan, 1954).
36. Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1958), 200.
37. Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1958), 200-201.
38. Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1973), 175.
39. Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1973), 178.
40. Oakeshott, ‘On the Character of the Modern European State’, above n 18, 199-203.
41. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, The Federalist Papers [1788] isaac Kramnick ed. (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1987), No. 49.
42. Thomas Hobbes, Behemoth, or the Long Parliament [1682] Ferdinand Tönnies ed. (London, Cass, 1969), 16.
43. Joseph de Maistre, ‘Study on Sovereignty’ in Jack Lively (ed.), The Works of Joseph de Maistre (London, Allen and Unwin, 1965), 93-129.
44. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Political Education’ in His Rationalism in Politics (London, Methuen, 1962), 111-36, at 112.
45. Oakeshott, ‘On the Civil Condition’ in His On Hum an Conduct, above n 18, 108-84, at 109-10.
46. Hélène Millet and Peter Moraw, ‘Clerics in the State’ in Reinhard (ed.), ch 9 at 179.
47. Case of the Duchy of Lancaster (1561) 1 Plowden 212,213.
48. Sir John Fortescue, De Laudibus Legum Anglie [1468-71] SB Chrimes ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1942).
49. Janelle Greenberg, ‘Our Grand Maxim of State, “The King Can Do No Wrong” '(1991) History of Political Thought 209-28.
50. AV Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 8th edition (London, Macmillan, 1914), 322.
51. Hobbes,.Leviathan, above n 23, ch 30: Of the Office of the Soveraign Representative.
52. AF Pollard, The Evolution of Parliament (London, Longmans, 1926), 230.
53. This point provides one answer to Lord Cooper’s puzzle, Expressed in MacCormick v Lord Advocate 1953 SC 396, at 411.
54. Lester Edwin J. Ruiz, ‘Sovereignty as a Transformative Practice’ in Walker and Mendlovitz (eds), above n 5, 79-96, at 85.
55. Ruiz, ‘Sovereignty as a Transformative Practice’ in Walker and Mendlovitz (eds), above n 5, 79-96, at 85.
56. Hannah Arendt, ‘What is Authority?' in Her Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1977), 91-141, at 122.
57. Hannah Arendt, ‘What is Authority?' in Her Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1977), 91-141, at 122.
58. Charles Tilly (ed.), The Formation of Nation States in Western Europe (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1975);
59. Otto Hintze, The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze Felix Gilbert ed. (New York, Oxford University Press, 1975);
60. Michael Mann, The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986).
61. Martin van Creveld, The Rise and Decline of the State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999).
62. John Brewer, The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688-1783 (London, Unwin Hyman, 1989).
63. Benedetto Croce, Politics and Morals [1925] Salvatore J. Castiglione trans. (New York, Philosophical Library, 1945), 14.
64. Jean Bodin, Six livres de la république, [1576] Bk.I, ch 8.
65. Bodin, On Sovereignty Julian Franklin ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992), 1.
66. Bodin, On Sovereignty Julian Franklin ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992) ch 8, at 12-3.
67. Paul Laband, Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches (Tübingen, Mohr, 1901), vol. 2, 64-7, 85-8;
68. Georg Jellinek, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Berlin, Springer, 1900), 483-4.
69. MH Hansen, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes (Oxford, Blackwell, 1991).
70. Bernard Manin, The Principles of Representative Democracy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997).
71. Hobbes, Leviathan, above n 23, 120-121.
72. RBJ Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993).
73. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 8th edition (London, Macmillan, 1914), 38.
74. George Lawson, Politica Sacra et Civilis or; A Modell of Civil and Ecclesiasticall Government [1660] Conal Condren ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992), 47.
75. Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, What is the Third Estate? [1789] M. Blondel trans. (London, Pall Mall Press, 1963), 124-128.
76. Lawson, Politica Sacra et Civilis or; A Modell of Civil and Ecclesiasticall Government [1660] Conal Condren ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992), 47.
77. Sieyes, What is the Third Estate? [1789] M. Blondel trans. (London, Pall Mall Press, 1963), 122-3.
78. Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1958), 201.
79. Michel Villey, ‘L’idée du droit subjectif et les systèmes juridiques romains’ (1946) Revue historique de droit 24-25, 201.
80. Tuck, ‘Tuck on rights: some medieval problems’ (1983) 4 History of Political Thought 429;
81. Tierney, ‘Origins of natural rights language: texts and contexts, 1150-1250' (1989) 10 History of Political Thought 615.
82. Wesley N Hohfeld, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1923).
83. Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws [1748] Anne M Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller and Harold Samuel Stone trans. and ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989), Bk. 11, ch 3.
84. Michael Ignatieff, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2001), 3-52.
85. Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws [1748] Anne M Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller and Harold Samuel Stone trans. and ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989), Bk. 1, ch 9.
86. Hannah Arendt, On Violence (San Diego, California, Harcourt, Brace and Co, 1970), 42:.
87. Bodin, Six livres de la république, Bk. I, ch 8: ‘For law is nothing but the command of a sovereign making use of his power’.
88. Jellinek, Cited in Kriegel, above n 18, 32.
89. John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined [1832] Wilfrid E. Rumble ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995), 166.
90. John W Salmond, Jurisprudence PJ Fitzgerald (ed.) 12th edition (London, Stevens, 1966), 111-112.
91. HLA Flart The Concept of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1961), 245.
92. Dicey, above n 46, 37.
93. HWR Wade, ‘The basis of legal sovereignty’ [1955] Cambridge Law Journal 172-97
94. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999), 75.
95. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 128.
96. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 128
97. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 129, 128.
98. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 129.
99. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 129
100. Neil MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 133.
101. Neil MacCormick, ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 1-18.
102. MacCormick, above n 90, ch 8, ‘On Sovereignty and Post-Sovereignty’.
103. MacCormick, above n 90, ch 8, ‘On Sovereignty and Post-Sovereignty 12.
104. MacCormick, Implicitly recognising the limitations of this empirical conception of political power, stated that ‘Political power, to be sustained over time, requires legitimacy. Law is a significant source of legitimacy’.
105. Neil MacCormick, ‘Sovereignty: Myth and Reality’ in Nils Jareborg (ed.), Towards Universal Law: Trends in National, European and International Law-m aking (Uppsala, Iustus Förlag, 1995), 227-248, at 235.
106. Hans Lindahl, ‘The Purposiveness of Law:Two Concepts of Representation in the European Union’ (1998) 17 Law and Philosophy 481-505, at 484-7.
107. Hans Lindahl, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory trans. by Bonnie L. Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson of first edn. [1934] of Reine Rechtslehre (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992), 1.
108. Hans Kelsen, ‘God and the State’ [1922] in his Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy Ota Weinberger intro. (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1973), ch 3.
109. Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty [1922] George Schwab trans. (Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1988), 21.
110. Hans Kelsen, Die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Tübingen, Mohr, 1920), 320;
111. Schmitt, Die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Tübingen, Mohr, 1920), 21.
112. Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political [1932] George Schwab trans. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996), 66.
113. Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political [1932] George Schwab trans. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996), 15.
114. Martti Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Natiojts: The Rise and Fall of International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001), 205-6.
115. Alan J. Ward, ‘Devolution: Labour’s Strange Constitutional “Design” ‘in Jeffrey Jowell and Dawn Oliver (eds), The Changing Constitution 4th edition (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000), ch 5.
116. David Held, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt and Jonathan Perraton, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999).
117. lan S. Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation-State re. edn. (London, Routledge, 1994), esp. ch 1.
118. Bruno de Witte, ‘Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order’ in Paul Craig and Grâinne de Burca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999), 177-213.
119. JHH Weiler, The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes have an Emperor? (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999);
120. Dieter Grimm, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?' (1995) 1 European Law Journal 282-302;
121. Jürgen Habermas, “Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?" '(1995) 1 European Law Journal 303-307.
122. Neil Walker, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317-59.
123. Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR 57.
124. Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR. 49.
125. Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR. 34.
126. Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR. 44.
127. Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR. 46.
128. Reference by the Governor in Council, Pursuant to section 53 of the Supreme Court Act, concerning the secession of Quebec from Canada [1998] 2 SCR 217;
129. Mark D. Walters, ‘Nationalism and the Pathology of Legal Systems:Considering the Quebec Secession Reference and its Lessons for the United Kingdom’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 371-96.
130. John Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990).
131. Michel Foucault, ‘Governmentality’ in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 87-104.
132. Michel Foucault, ‘What is Enlightenment?' in Paul Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1986), 32-50, at 47.
133. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison Alan Sheridan trans. (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1977).
134. Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality Robert Hurley trans. (New York, Vintage, 1978), vol. 1, 135-45.
135. Michel Foucault, Power/Knowledge (Brighton, Harvester, 1980), 121.
136. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000).
137. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) 88.
138. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii.
139. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii, 8.
140. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 354: ‘Empire constitutes the ontological fabric in which all the relations of power are woven together-political and economic relations as well as social and personal relations’.
141. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 188-189.
142. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 187: ‘In the imperial world, this dialectic of soverçignty between the civil order and the natural order has come to an end’.
143. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 307.
144. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 306.
145. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 139-40:.
146. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 62.
147. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 13-4.
148. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xii 375.
149. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 2000) xi.
150. Antonio Negri, Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State Maurizia Boscagli trans. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1999).
151. Antonio Negri, Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State Maurizia Boscagli trans. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1999) 393.
152. Charles Taylor, ‘Foucault on Freedom and Truth’ in his Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985), 152-84.