Chronic 30-Hz deep cerebellar stimulation coupled with training enhances post-ischemia motor recovery and peri-infarct synaptophysin expression in rodents

Neurosurgery

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 344-353

  MacHado, Andre G ^a   Cooperrider, Jessica ^a   Furmaga, Havan T ^a   Baker, Kenneth B ^b   Park, Hyun Joo ^a   Chen, Zhihong ^a   Gale, John T ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Diaschisis; Ischemia; Plasticity; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ENDOTHELIN 1; SYNAPTOPHYSIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBELLUM; CEREBELLUM NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; SYNAPTOPHYSIN;

EID: 84880916997     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000430766.80102.ac     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4): e18-e209.
2. Floel A, Cohen LG. Translational studies in neurorehabilitation: from bench to bedside. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19(1):1-10.
3. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007; 25(2):123-129.
4. Boggio PS, Alonso-Alonso M, Mansur CG, et al. Hand function improvement with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in a severe case of stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(11): 927-930.
5. Conforto AB, Ferreiro KN, Tomasi C, et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(3): 263-272.
6. Adkins-Muir DL, Jones TA. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):780-788.
7. Frost SB, Barbay S, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, Nudo RJ. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(6):3205-3214.
8. Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(suppl 2):853-862.
9. Plow EB, Carey JR, Nudo RJ, Pascual-Leone A. Invasive cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke: a critical appraisal. Stroke. 2009;40(5): 1926-1931.
10. Machado A, Baker KB. Upside down crossed cerebellar diaschisis: proposing chronic stimulation of the dentatothalamocortical pathway for post-stroke motor recovery. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6:20.
11. Dum RP, Li C, Strick PL. Motor and nonmotor domains in the monkey dentate. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;978:289-301.
12. Dum RP, Strick PL. An unfolded map of the cerebellar dentate nucleus and its projections to the cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(1):634-639.
13. Machado AG, Baker KB, Schuster D, Butler RS, Rezai A. Chronic electrical stimulation of the contralesional lateral cerebellar nucleus enhances recovery of motor function after cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2009;1280: 107-116.
14. Baker KB, Schuster D, Cooperrider J, Machado AG. Deep brain stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus produces frequency-specific alterations in motor evoked potentials in the rat in vivo. Exp Neurol. 2010;226(2):259-264.
15. Aumann TD, Rawson JA, Horne MK. The relationship between monkey dentate cerebellar nucleus activity and kinematic parameters of wrist movement. Exp Brain Res. 1998;119(2):179-190.
16. Aumann TD, Fetz EE. Oscillatory activity in forelimb muscles of behaving monkeys evoked by microstimulation in the cerebellar nuclei. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 361(1-3):106-110.
17. Teskey GC, Flynn C, Goertzen CD, Monfils MH, Young NA. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):794-800.
18. Windle V, Szymanska A, Granter-Button S, et al. An analysis of four different methods of producing focal cerebral ischemia with endothelin-1 in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2006;201(2):324-334.
19. Park HJ, Machado AG, Cooperrider J, et al. Semi-automated method for estimating lesion volumes. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;213(1):76-83.
20. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998.
21. Adkins DL, Hsu JE, Jones TA. Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Exp Neurol. 2008;212(1):14-28.
22. Manola L, Holsheimer J, Veltink P, Buitenweg JR. Anodal vs cathodal stimulation of motor cortex: a modeling study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(2):464-474.
23. Takasawa M,Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, et al. Prognostic value of subacute crossed cerebellar diaschisis: single-photon emission CT study in patients with middle cerebral artery territory infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(2):189-193.
24. Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Nardone R, et al. Motor cortex changes in a patient with hemicerebellectomy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97(5):259-263.
25. Rispal-Padel L, Cicirata F, Pons C. Contribution of the dentato-thalamo-cortical system to control of motor synergy. Neurosci Lett. 1981;22(2):137-144.