Comparative evaluation of different medication safety measures for the emergency department: Physicians' usage and acceptance of training, poster, checklist and computerized decision support

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Sedlmayr, Brita ^a   Patapovas, Andrius ^a   Kirchner, Melanie ^a   Sonst, Anja ^a,b   Müller, Fabian ^a   Pfistermeister, Barbara ^a   Plank Kiegele, Bettina ^a   Vogler, Renate ^a   Criegee Rieck, Manfred ^a   Prokosch, Hans Ulrich ^a   Dormann, Harald ^b   Maas, Renke ^a   Bürkle, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Fuerth   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support systems; Emergency department; Evaluation; Medication safety; Patient safety; TAM2; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; CHECKLIST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DRUG THERAPY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DRUG INFORMATION; DRUG UTILIZATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; INTERVIEW; MANPOWER; MEDICATION ERROR; PRESCRIPTION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; ARTICLE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CHECKLIST; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DRUG INFORMATION SERVICES; DRUG PRESCRIPTIONS; DRUG THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DRUG UTILIZATION; DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS AND ADVERSE REACTIONS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; GERMANY; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICATION ERRORS; MEDICATION SYSTEMS, HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84880908497     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-79     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. WHO Fact sheet N°293. Medicines: safety of medicines-adverse drug reactions http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs293/en/ 22971901
2. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN, J Am Med Assoc 1998 279 15 1200 1205 10.1001/jama.279.15.1200 (Pubitemid 28193431)
3. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. Wester K, Jonsson A, Spigset O, Druid H, Hagg S, Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008 65 4 573 579 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03064.x 18070216 (Pubitemid 351365134)
4. Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit- Agenda Patientensicherheit 2007, Germany http://www.aps-ev.de/fileadmin/fuerRedakteur/PDFs/Agenda- Patientensicherheit/Agenda-2007-mit-Titelblatt.pdf
5. Incidence and prevention of lethal undesirable drug effects. Schnurrer JU, Frölich JC, Internist (Berl) 2003 44 7 889 895 10.1007/s00108-003-0988- 3 (Pubitemid 36890019)
6. Computer-based drug management in a bone marrow transplant unit: a suitable tool for multiple prescriptions even in critical conditions. Krampera M, Venturini F, Benedetti F, Oliani A, Carolei S, Visco C, Aqel H, Pizzolo G, Scroccaro G, Br J Haematol 2004 125 1 50 57 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04855.x 15015968 (Pubitemid 38453277)
7. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Potts AL, Barr FE, Gregory DF, Wright L, Patel NR, Pediatrics 2004 113 1 Pt 1 59 63 14702449 (Pubitemid 38057494)
8. The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital. Upperman JS, Staley P, Friend K, Neches W, Kazimer D, Benes J, Wiener ES, J Pediatr Surg 2005 40 1 57 59 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.024 15868559 (Pubitemid 40143532)
9. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma'Luf N, Boyle D, Leape L, J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999 6 4 313 321 10.1136/jamia.1999.00660313 10428004 (Pubitemid 29328569)
10. Documentation-based clinical decision support to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Tsurikova R, Yu T, Volk LA, Melnikas AJ, Palchuk MB, Olsha-Yehiav M, Middleton B, Inform Prim Care 2009 17 4 231 240 20359401
11. Comparative evaluation of three clinical decision support systems: prospective screening for medication errors in 100 medical inpatients. Fritz D, Ceschi A, Curkovic I, Huber M, Egbring M, Kullak-Ublick GA, Russmann S, Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2012 68 8 1209 1219 10.1007/s00228-012-1241-6 22374346
12. Comparing user acceptance of a computer system in two pediatric offices: a qualitative study. Travers DA, Downs SM, Proc AMIA Symp 2000 853 857
13. Decision support in medicine: a survey of problems of user acceptance. Wendt T, Knaup-Gregori P, Winter A, Stud Health Technol Inform 2000 77 852 856 11187675 (Pubitemid 33227737)
14. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, Rousseau N, Grimshaw J, Parkin D, Purves I, BMJ 2002 325 7370 941 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.941 12399345
15. Development and validation of a survey instrument for assessing prescribers' perception of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts. Zheng K, Fear K, Chaffee BW, Zimmerman CR, Karls EM, Gatwood JD, Stevenson JG, Pearlman MD, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 Suppl 1 51 61 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000053 21486876
16. Ajzen I, Fishbein M, Understanding attitudes and prediciting social behavior Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1980
17. Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Ajzen I, Madden TJ, J Exp Soc Psychol 1986 22 453 474 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
18. The theory of planned behavior. Ajzen I, Behav Hum Decis Process 1991 50 179 211 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
19. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Dishaw MT, Strong DM, Inform Manage 1999 36 1 9 21 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3 (Pubitemid 129524590)
20. I/S Attitudes-toward Theoretical and Definitional Clarity. Goodhue D, Data Base 1988 19 3-4 6 15
21. Rogers EM, Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free Press 1995
22. User acceptance of information technology-system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Davis FD, Int J Man Mach Stud 1993 38 3 475 487 10.1006/imms.1993.1022
23. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Venkatesh V, Davis FD, Manage Sci 2000 46 2 186 204 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 (Pubitemid 30594361)
24. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Venkatesh S, Bala H, Decis Sci 2008 39 2 273 315 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192. x
25. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD, MIS Q 2003 27 3 425 478
26. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Holden RJ, Karsh BT, J Biomed Inform 2010 43 1 159 172 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 19615467
27. Technology acceptance among physicians-a new take on TAM. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB, Med Care Res Rev 2007 64 6 650 672 10.1177/1077558707305942 17717378 (Pubitemid 350077318)
28. Building the technical infrastructure to support a study on drug safety in a general hospital. Kirchner M, Bürkle T, Patapovas A, Mathews A, Sojer R, Muller F, Dormann H, Maas R, Prokosch HU, Stud Health Technol Inform 2011 169 325 329 21893766
29. Adverse drug events in older patients admitted as an emergency- the role of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly people (PRISCUS). Dormann H, Sonst A, Müller F, Vogler R, Patapovas A, Pfistermeister B, Plank-Kiegele B, Kirchner M, Hartmann N, Bürkle T, et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013 110 13 213 219 23596501
30. German Coalition for Patient Safety http://www.aktionsbuendnis- patientensicherheit.de.
31. OntoDrug® AMTS, UBM Medica, Germany http://www.ontodrug.de
32. Orbis, AGFA Healthcare, Germany http://www.agfahealthcare.com/germany/de/ main/products-services/Krankenhaus-Informationssystem/index.jsp
33. MMI PharmIndex Plus, UBM Medica, Germany http://www.pharmindex-plus.de/
34. Drug safety and knowledge based functions: a stepwise approach against information overload. Patapovas A, Dormann H, Sedlmayr B, Kirchner M, Mathews A, Müller F, Pfistermeister B, Plank-Kiegele B, Vogler R, Maas R, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol (in print)
35. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S, Proc AMIA Symp 2002 155 159
36. User acceptance of HIV TIDES-Tailored Interventions for Management of Depressive Symptoms in persons living with HIV/AIDS. Lai TY, Larson EL, Rockoff ML, Bakken S, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 15 2 217 226 18096915 (Pubitemid 351288544)
37. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP, Int J Med Inform 2009 78 4 219 229 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.006 18768345
38. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. Zhang H, Cocosila M, Archer N, Comput Inform Nurs 2010 28 1 49 56 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181c0474a 19940621
39. Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N, Eur J Inform Syst 2007 16 6 725 737 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000717
40. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Moore GC, Benbasat I, Inf Sys Research 1991 2 3 192 222 10.1287/isre.2.3.192
41. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P, Health Technol Assess 1998 2 16 ii ix 1-274 9919458
42. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A, Ampt A, Creswick N, Coiera E, Iedema R, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007 14 6 746 755 10.1197/jamia.M2462 17712083 (Pubitemid 350026422)
43. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM, Int J Med Inform 2007 76 1 66 77 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 16901749 (Pubitemid 44895002)
44. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Tung FC, Chang SC, Chou CM, Int J Med Inform 2008 77 5 324 335 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007. 06.006 17644029 (Pubitemid 351444868)
45. Does fragmentation of working time and working space influence the acceptance of mobile technology? A case of finnish physicians. Han S, Mustonen P, Seppänen M, Kallio M, TUCS Technical Reports 2005 657 1 32
46. Using multi-perspective methodologies to study users' interactions with the prototype front end of a guideline-based decision support system for diabetic foot care. Peleg M, Shachak A, Wang D, Karnieli E, Int J Med Inform 2009 78 7 482 493 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.008 19328739
47. Physicians' reported needs of drug information at point of care in Sweden. Rahmner PB, Eiermann B, Korkmaz S, Gustafsson LL, Gruven M, Maxwell S, Eichle HG, Veg A, Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012 73 1 115 125 10.1111/j.1365-2125. 2011.04058.x 21714807
48. Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis. Gosling AS, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Int J Med Inform 2003 69 1 1 16 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00046-1 12485700 (Pubitemid 35461924)
49. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. Boonstra A, Broekhuis M, BMC Health Serv Res 2010 10 231 10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 20691097
50. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives. Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J, Int J Med Inform 2004 73 4 357 362 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.02.001 15135754 (Pubitemid 38621995)
51. Improving general practice computer systems for patient safety: qualitative study of key stakeholders. Avery AJ, Savelyich BS, Sheikh A, Morris CJ, Bowler I, Teasdale S, Qual Saf Health Care 2007 16 1 28 33 10.1136/qshc.2006.018192 17301200 (Pubitemid 46347947)
52. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. Walton RT, Gierl C, Yudkin P, Mistry H, Vessey MP, Fox J, BMJ 1997 315 7111 791 795 10.1136/bmj.315.7111.791 9345174 (Pubitemid 27405948)
53. Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders. Patterson ES, Nguyen AD, Halloran JP, Asch SM, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 1 50 59 14527974 (Pubitemid 38044923)
54. Implementing computers in ambulatory care: implications of physician practice patterns for system design. Aydin CE, Forsythe DE, Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997 677 681 (Pubitemid 127434565)
55. When usage and user satisfaction differ: the case of an electronic discharge summary. Bürkle T, Engel PA, Stud Health Technol Inform 2007 129 Pt 2 1093 1097 17911884
56. Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids. Graham ID, Logan J, Bennett CL, Presseau J, O'Connor AM, Mitchell SL, Tetroe JM, Cranney A, Hebert P, Aaron SD, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007 7 20 10.1186/1472-6947-7-20 17617908 (Pubitemid 47101759)
57. Expectations and experiences of eHealth in primary care: a qualitative practice-based investigation. Flynn D, Gregory P, Makki H, Gabbay M, Int J Med Inform 2009 78 9 588 604 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.008 19482542
58. Family Physicians' perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation. Heselmans A, Aertgeerts B, Donceel P, Geens S, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, J Med Syst 2012 36 6 3677 3684 10.1007/s10916-012-9841-3 22402980
59. Information technology for medication administration: assessing bedside readiness among nurses in Lebanon. Marini SD, Hasman A, Huijer HA, Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009 7 1 49 58 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00119.x 21631846
60. Development and comparison of user acceptance of advanced comprehensive triage PDA support system with a traditional terminal alternative system. Chang P, Tzeng YM, Wu SC, Sang YY, Chen SS, AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003 140 144