Information technology for medication administration: Assessing bedside readiness among nurses in Lebanon

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 49-58

  Marini, Sana Daya ^a   Hasman, Arie ^b   Huijer, Huda Abu Saad ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Education professional; Evaluation; Evidence based practice; Implementation; Nursing

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549132929     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00119.x     Document Type: Note

References (31)

1. Gould D, Boies J, Lewis C. Making usable, useful, productivityenhancing computer applications. Commun ACM 1991; 34: 75-85.
2. Davis D. User acceptance of information technology: system characyeristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 1993; 38: 475-87.
3. Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration. Bar code label requirements for human drug products&biological products. Federal Register 69(38) Thursday, Feb 26 3004/Rules and Regulations 21 CFR Parts 201, 606 and 610, [Docek No. 2002N-0204]. Accessed 14 May 2007. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/CbER/rules/barcodelabel.pdf
4. Beuscart-Zephir C, Brender J, Beuscart R, Menager-Depriester I. Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54: 19-28.
5. Davis D, Bagozzi P, Warshaw R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35: 982-1003.
6. Dillon A, Morris M. User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1996; 31: 3-32.
7. Davis D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 1989; 13: 319-40.
8. Igbaria M. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test. OMEGA-INT J Manage S 1993; 21: 73-90.
9. Cole G. User acceptance key to success of voice processing. Computing Canada 1992; 18: 39-40.
10. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Printice-Hall, Inc, 1980.
11. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
12. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol Bull 1977; 84: 888-918.
13. Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg P, Cavaye A. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quart 1997; 21: 279-305.
14. Keil M, Beranek PM, Konsynski BR. Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decis Support Syst 1995; 13: 75-91.
15. Succi MJ, Walter ZD. Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: an examination of health care professionals. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32); 5-8 Jan 1999, Maui, Hawaii. Track 4: Information Technology in Health Care1999. Maui: IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
16. Benbasat I, Dexter AS. An Investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Quart 1986; 59-84.
17. Baroudi J, Olson MH, Ives B. An Empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Commun ACM 1986; 29: 232-8.
18. Ginzberg MJ. Steps towards more effective implementation of MS and MIS. Interfaces 1978; 8: 57-63.
19. Huber GP. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS design: much ado about nothing? Manage Sci 1983; 29: 567-82.
20. Greenly M, Gugerty B. How bar coding reduces medication errors. FindArticles.com. Nursing 2002; May: 1-2. Accessed 8 May 2007. Available from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3689/is_200205/ai_n9084283
21. Ragan R, Bond J, Major K, Kingsford T, Eidem L, Garrelts JC. Improved control of medication use with an integrated barcode-packaging and distribution system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62: 1075-9.
22. Johnson CL, Carlson RA, Tucker CL, Willette C. Using BCMA software to improve patient safety in veterans administration medical centers. J Healthc Inf Manag 2002; 16: 46-51.
23. Yang M, Brown MM, Trohimovich B, Dana M, Kelly J. The effect of bar-code enabled point-of-care technology on medication administration errors. In: Lewis R, ed. The Impact of Information Technology on Patient Safety. Chicago, IL: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, 2002; 37-56.
24. Coyle GA, Heinen M. Evolution of BCMA within the Department of Veteran Affairs. Nurs Adm Q 2005; 29: 32-8.
25. Anderson S, Wittwer W. Using bar-code point-of-care technology for patient safety. J Healthc Qual 2004; 26: 5-11.
26. Baker HM. Rules outside the rules for administration of medication: a study in New South Wales, Australia. J Nurs Scholarsh 1997; 29: 155-8.
27. Murray M. Automated medication dispensing devices. In: Shojania K, Duncan B, McDonald K, Wachter R, eds. Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, 2001; 111-7.
28. Patterson ES, Cook RI, Render ML. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 540-53.
29. Patterson ES, Cook RI, Render ML. Fifteen best practice recommendations for bar-code medication administration in the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2005; 30: 355-65.
30. Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, Render ML. Compliance with intended use of Bar Code Medication Administration in acute and long-term care: an observational study. Hum Factors 2006; 48: 15-22.
31. Walstrom KA, Wilson RL. Gaining user acceptance of an EIS. Inform Syst Manage 1997; 14: 54-9.