Using multi-perspective methodologies to study users' interactions with the prototype front end of a guideline-based decision support system for diabetic foot care

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 78, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 482-493

  Peleg, Mor ^a   Shachak, Aviv ^b   Wang, Dongwen ^c   Karnieli, Eddy ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support systems; Clinical practice guidelines; Sequence diagrams; Technology acceptance; Usability heuristics

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; USABILITY HEURISTICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; GRAPHIC METHODS; HEURISTIC METHODS; SOFTWARE TESTING; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETIC FOOT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIABETIC FOOT; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 67349193189     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. The Clinical Practice Guideline Diabetes Panel of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Diabetic foot disorders: a clinical practice guideline. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 45 5 (2006) S1-S66
2. Shea S., DuMouchel W., and Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventative care in the ambulatory setting. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 3 6 (1996) 399-409
3. Peleg M., Wang D., Fodor A., Keren S., and Karnieli E. Adaptation of practice guidelines for clinical decision support: a case study of diabetic foot care. Workshop on AI Techniques in Healthcare: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Protocols in Conjunction with ECAI (2006), Riva del Garda, Italy
4. Bates D.W., Kuperman G.J., Wang S., Gandhi T., Kittler A., Volk L., et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 6 (2003) 523-530
5. Wetter T. Lessons learnt from bringing knowledge-based decision support into routine use. Artif. Intell. Med. 24 3 (2002) 195-203
6. Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75 (2006) 125-137
7. B. Rocheleau, Governmental information system problems and failures: a preliminary review, Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal. 1997 [cited 2008/07/22];2(3). Available from: http://www.pamij.com/roche.html.
8. Boxwala A.A., Peleg M., Tu S., Ogunyemi O., Zeng Q., Wang D., et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J. Biomed. Inform. 37 3 (2004) 147-161
9. Wang D., Peleg M., Tu S., Boxwala A.A., Ogunyemi O., Zeng Q., et al. Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine. J. Biomed. Inform. 37 5 (2004) 305-318
10. Atkinson N.L., Massett H.A., Mylks C., Hanna B., Deering M.J., and Hesse B.W. User-centered research on breast cancer patient needs and preferences of an internet-based clinical trial matching system. J. Med. Internet Res. 9 2 (2007) e13
11. Gao T., Kim M.I., White D., and Alm A.M. Iterative user-centered design of a next generation patient monitoring system for emergency medical response. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium (2006) 284-288
12. Johnson C.M., Johnson T.R., and Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J. Biomed. Inform. 38 1 (2005) 75-87
13. Kinzie M.B., Cohn W.F., Julian M.F., and Knaus W.A. A user-centered model for web site design: needs assessment, user interface design, and rapid prototyping. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9 4 (2002) 320-330
14. Zhang L., Patel V., Johnson K.A., and Smith J.W. Designing human-centered distributed information systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17 5 (2002) 42-47
15. Hoffer J.A., George J.F., and Valacich J.S. Modern Systems Analysis and Design. 3rd ed. (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ)
16. Kushniruk A.W., and Patel V.L. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J. Biomed. Inform. 37 1 (2004) 56-76
17. M. Peleg, Appendices for diabetic foot DSS paper, 2007 [2008/07/22]. Available from: http://mis.hevra.haifa.ac.il/∼morpeleg/Appendices.html.
18. Preece J., Rogers Y., and Sharp H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (2002), Wiley, New York
19. Object Management Group, Unified modeling language (UML) specification, Version 2 ed.; 2005 [cited 2008/07/22]. Available from: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/321_uml/.
20. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering (1993), Academic Press, Boston
21. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13 3 (1989) 319-340
22. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46 2 (2000) 186-204
23. Lindell M.K., Brandt C.J., and Whitney D.J. A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 23 2 (1999) 127-135
24. J. Nielsen, First Rule of Usability? Don't Listen to Users. August 2001[cited 2008/07/22]. Available from: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010805.html.
25. J. Nielsen, Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users. March 2000 [cited 2008/07/22]. Available from: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html.
26. Castro J., Kolp M., and Mylopoulos J. Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the Tropos project. Inf. Syst. 27 6 (2002) 365-389