Family physicians' perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 3677-3684

  Heselmans, Annemie ^a   Aertgeerts, Bert ^a,b   Donceel, Peter ^a   Geens, Siegfried ^b   Van De Velde, Stijn ^b   Ramaekers, Dirk ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Belgian Center for Evidence Based Medicine   (Belgium)

^c ZNA Hospital Network Antwerp   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Barriers; Electronic clinical decision support systems; Evidence based medicine; Perceptions; Reminder systems

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84867858640     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-012-9841-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Garg, A. X.; Adhikari, N. K.; McDonald, H.; et al.; Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 293:1223-1238, 2005.
2. Eccles, M.; and Grimshaw, J.; Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical guidelines: Are there any magic bullets? Med. J. Aust. 180(Suppl 6):S52-S54, 2004.
3. Johnston, M. E.; Langton, K. B.; Haynes, R. B.; and Mathieu, A.; Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann. Intern. Med. 120:136-142, 1994.
4. Shea, S.; DuMouchel, W.; and Bahamonde, L.; A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. JAMIA 3:399-409, 1996.
5. Heselmans, A.; Van de Velde, S.; Donceel, P.; Aertgeerts, B.; and Ramaekers, D.; Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settingsa systematic review. Implement. Sci. 4:82, 2009.
6. Shojania, K. G.; Jennings, A.; Mayhew, A.; Ramsay, C.; Eccles, M.; and Grimshaw, J.; Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: A systematic review. CMAJ 182:E216-E225, 2010.
7. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.; and Davis, G.; User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27:425-478, 2003.
8. Wills, M. J.; El-Gayar, O. F.; and Bennett, D.; Examining healthcare professionals' acceptance of electronic medical records using UTAUT. Issues in Information Systems 9:396-401, 2008.
9. Schaper, L.; and Pervan, G.; A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 130:91-101, 2007.
10. EBMeDS: Context-Sensitive Guidance At the Point of Care. http://www.ebmeds.org. Accessed 13 November 2011
11. Varonen, H.; Kortteisto, T.; and Kaila, M.; What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): A focus group study with physicians. Fam. Pract. 25:162-167, 2008.
12. Rousseau, N.; McColl, E.; Newton, J.; Grimshaw, J.; and Eccles, M.; Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 326:314, 2003.
13. Bates, D. W.; Kuperman, G. J.; Wang, S.; et al.; Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10:523-530, 2003.
14. Trivedi, M. H.; Daly, E. J.; Kern, J. K.; Grannemann, B. D.; Sunderajan, P.; and Claassen, C. A.; Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: An observational report on lessons learned in real world clinical settings. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9:6, 2009.
15. Ahearn, M. D.; and Kerr, S. J.; General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision-support tools in their prescribing software. Med. J. Aust. 179:34-37, 2003.
16. Vaziri, A.; Connor, E.; Shepherd, I.; Jones, R. T.; Chan, T.; and de Lusignan, S.; Are we setting about improving the safety of computerised prescribing in the right way? Inform. Prim. Care 17:175-182, 2009.
17. van der Sijs, H.; Aarts, J.; Vulto, A.; and Berg, M.; Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13:138-147, 2006.