Contributing factors to corneal deformation in air puff measurements

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 5078-5085

  Kling, Sabine ^a   Marcos, Susana ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE ÓPTICA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Air puff; Corneal dynamics; Cross linking; In vitro; In vivo

Indexed keywords

DEXTRAN; RIBOFLAVIN;

AIR PUFF DEVICE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA THICKNESS; CROSS LINKING; DEHYDRATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NONHUMAN; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SWINE; VISCOELASTICITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AIR PUFF; CORNEAL DYNAMICS; CROSS-LINKING; IN VITRO; IN VIVO;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AIR; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SWINE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84880841470     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12509     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Recep ÖF, Hasiripi H, Nurullah C, Srikatipoglu H. Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measure-ment by noncontact and applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1787-1791.
2. Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, Bianco S, Sebastiani A. Noncontact tonometry in patients that underwent photo-refractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211:341-343.
3. Shields B. The noncontact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24:211-219.
4. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
5. Dorronsoro C, Pascual D, Perez-Merino P, Kling S, Marcos S. Dynamic OCT measurement of corneal deformation by air puff in normal and cross-linked corneas. Biomed Opt Exp. 2012;3: 473-487.
6. Hon Y, Lam A. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90: 1-8.
7. Oxlund H, Simonsen AH. Biochemical studies of normal and keratoconus corneas. Acta Opthalmologica. 1985;63:666-669.
8. Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66:130-140.
9. Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66:97-103.
10. Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Fink M. High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28:1881-1893.
11. Scarcelli G, Pineda R, Yun SH. Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53: 185-190.
12. Boyce BL, Jones, Nguyen TD, Grazier JM. Stress-controlled viscoelastic tensile response of bovine cornea. J Biomech. 2007;40:2367-2376.
13. Kling S, Remon L, Perez-Escudero A, Merayo-Lloves J, Marcos S. Corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking from porcine eye inflation experiments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3961-3968.
14. Kling S, Marcos S. Effect of hydration state and storage media on corneal biomechanical response from in vitro inflation tests. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:490-497.
15. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoco-nus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:620-627.
16. Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, et al. A new tonometer - the Corvis ST tonometer clinical comparison with noncontact, and gold-mann applanation tonometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:659-665.
17. Hennighausen H, Feldman ST, Bille JF, McCulloch AD. Anterior-posterior strain variation in normally hydrated and swollen rabbit cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:253-262.
18. Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the Ocular Response Analyzer. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:553-562.
19. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, Rama P, Campanelli M, Pye D. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Current Eye Res. 2007;32:11-19.
20. Yanjun Z, Jian Y, Kun H, Zhihui L, Xiuyun L. A comparison of biomechanical properties between human and porcine cornea. J Biomech. 2001;34:533-537.
21. Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Mahmoud AM, Trazza S, Hafezi F, Roberts CJ. Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:669-676.
22. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, Hartstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus? - A pilot study. Cornea. 2009;28:498-502.
23. Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. J Refract Surg. 2011;27: 452-547.
24. Scarcelli G, Yun SH. In vivo Brillouin optical microscopy of the human eye. Opt Express. 2012;20:9197-9202.
25. Wang H, Prendiville PL, McDonnell PJ, Chang WV. An ultrasound technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human conrea. J Biomech. 1996;29:1633-1636.
26. Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, Weber PA. A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3919-3926.