Management Discretion and Political Interference in Municipal Enterprises. Evidence from Italian Utilities

Local Government Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 514-540

  Garrone, Paola ^a   Grilli, Luca ^a   Rousseau, Xavier ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b MCKINSEY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

management discretion; Municipal utilities; political influence; restructuring

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; JOINT VENTURE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; MANAGEMENT; POLICY MAKING; PRIVATIZATION; PUBLIC SERVICE;

ITALY;

EID: 84880807482     PISSN: 03003930     EISSN: 17439388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2012.726198     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agrawal, A.A. and Knoeber, C.R. 2001. Do some outside directors play a political role?. The journal of law and economics, 44: 179 - 198.
2. Andrews, R. and Boyne, G.A. 2010. Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: testing the black box model of public management. Public administration review, 70: 443 - 454.
3. Bartel, A.P. and Harrison, A.E. 2005. Ownership versus environment: disentangling the sources of public-sector inefficiency. Review of economics and statistics, 87: 135 - 147.
4. Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. 1982. Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.
5. Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R.E. 1990. The composition of board of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy. Academy of management review, 15: 72 - 87.
6. Bel, G. and Costas, A. 2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatisation in Spain. Journal of policy reform, 9: 1 - 24.
7. Bel, G. and Fageda, X. 2007. Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local government studies, 33 (4): 517 - 534.
8. Bel, G. and Fageda, X. 2010. Partial privatisation in local services delivery: an empirical analysis of the choice of mixed firms. Local government studies, 36 (1): 129 - 149.
9. Bel, G., Hebdon, R. and Warner, M. 2007. Local government reform: privatisation and its alternatives. Local government studies, 33 (4): 507 - 515.
10. Bernier, L. and Simard, L. 2007. The governance of public enterprises: the Quebec experience. Annals of public and cooperative economics, 78 (3): 455 - 474.
11. Bognetti, G. and Robotti, L. 2007. The provision of local public services through mixed enterprises: the Italian case. Annals of public and cooperative economics, 78 (3): 415 - 437.
12. Bortolotti, B., Pellizzola, L. and Scarpa, C. 2007. " Le Partecipazioni dei Governi Locali in Italia. Meeting ". In Il governo locale azionista: proprietà, controllo, efficienza nei servizi pubblici locali 1 July, Rome
13. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C. and Guedhami, O. 2005. Postprivatisation corporate governance: the role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of financial economics, 76 (2): 369 - 399.
14. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. 1996. A theory of privatisation. Economic journal, 106 (435): 309 - 319.
15. Bozec, R. and Dia, M. 2007. Board structure and firm technical efficiency: evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. European journal of operational research, 177 (3): 1734 - 1750.
16. Cahan, S.F., Chua, F. and Nyamori, R.O. 2005. Board structure and executive compensation in the public sector: New Zealand evidence. Financial accountability & management, 21 (4): 437 - 465.
17. Carrozza, C. 2010. Privatising local public services: between industrial legacy and political ambition. Local government studies, 36 (5): 599 - 616.
18. Cavaliere, A. and Scabrosetti, S. 2008. Privatisation and efficiency: from principals and agents to political economy. Journal of economic surveys, 22 (4): 685 - 710.
19. Confservizi. 2008. Compendio statistico, Roma: Confservizi.
20. Cragg, M.I. and Dyck, I.J.A. 1999. Management control and privatisation in the United Kingdom. The RAND journal of economics, 30: 475 - 497.
21. Cristofoli, D. and Valotti, G. 2008. Lo Stato Imprenditore tra Politica e Management. Primo Rapporto sui CdA delle Public Utilities, Milano: Egea.
22. Cuervo, A. and Villalonga, B. 2000. Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatisation. Academy of management review, 25 (3): 581 - 590.
23. Dijkgraaf, E. and Gradus, R.H.J.M. 2008. Institutional developments in the Dutch waste collection market. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 26: 110 - 126.
24. Dixit, A. 2002. Incentives and organizations in the public sector: an interpretative review. Journal of human resources, 37: 696 - 727.
25. Dorigoni, S. and Portatadino, S. 2009. Natural gas distribution in Italy: when competition does not help the market. Utilities policy, 17 (3-4): 245 - 257.
26. D'Souza, J. and Megginson, W.L. 1999. The financial and operating performance of newly privatised firms in the 1990s. Journal of finance, 54: 1397 - 1438.
27. Erakovic, L. and Wilson, M. 2005. Conditions of radical transformation in state-owned enterprises. British journal of management, 16 (4): 293 - 313.
28. Fitch, K. 2007. Water privatisation in France and Germany: the importance of local interest groups. Local government studies, 33 (4): 589 - 605.
29. Fumagalli, E., Garrone, P. and Grilli, L. 2007. Service quality in the electricity industry: the role of privatisation and managerial behavior. Energy policy, 35: 6212 - 6224.
30. Gabris, G.T., Golembiewski, R.T. and Ihrke, D.M. 2000. Leadership credibility, board relations, and administrative innovation at the local government level. Journal of public administration research and theory, 11: 89 - 108.
31. Gilardoni, A. and Lorenzoni, G. 2003. Public Utilities Locali. Alleanze e Aggregazioni, Milano: Egea.
32. Grout, P.A. and Stevens, M. 2003. The assessment: financing and managing public services. Oxford review of economic policy, 19 (2): 215 - 234.
33. Gupta, N. 2005. Partial privatisation and firm performance. Journal of finance, 15: 987 - 1015.
34. Hart, O., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. 1997. The proper scope of government: theory and application to prisons. Quarterly journal of economics, 112: 1091 - 1126.
35. Hophmayer-Tokich, S. and Kliot, N. 2008. Inter-municipal cooperation for waste-water treatment: case studies from Israel. Journal of environmental management, 86 (3): 554 - 565.
36. Istat. 2008. Conti Economici delle Imprese - Anno 2004, Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
37. Kennedy, P. 2003. A guide to econometrics, 5th ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
38. Kumbhakar, S.C. and Hjalmarsson, L. 1998. Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick competition: electricity retail distribution. European economic review, 42: 7 - 122.
39. Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. 1991. Privatisation and incentives. Journal of law, economics and organization, 7: 84 - 105.
40. Levin, J. and Tadelis, S. 2010. Contracting for government services: theory and evidence from US cities. Journal of industrial economics, 58 (3): 507 - 541.
41. Li, W. and Xu, L.C. 2004. The impact of privatisation and competition in the telecommunications sector around the world. Journal of law and economics, 47: 395 - 430.
42. Megginson, W. and Netter, J.M. 2001. From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatisation. Journal of economic literature, 39: 321 - 389.
43. Oswald, S., Gardiner, L. and Jahera, J. 1994. Ownership effects on operating strategies: evidence of expense preference behavior in the hospital industry. Managerial and decision economics, 15: 235 - 244.
44. Oum, T.H., Adler, N. and Yu, C. 2006. Privatisation, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world major airports. Journal of air transport management, 12: 109 - 121.
45. Schmidt, K.M. 1996. The costs and benefits of privatisation: an incomplete contracts approach. Journal of law, economics and organization, 12 (1): 1 - 24.
46. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. 1994. Politicians and firms. Quarterly journal of economics, 109 (4): 995 - 1025.
47. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of finance, 52: 737 - 778.
48. Sørensen, R.J. 2007. Does dispersed ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public administration, 85 (4): 1045 - 1058.
49. Spiller, P.T. 2011. " Transaction cost regulation ". In NBER Working Paper Series, w16735, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
50. Unioncamere. 2008. Le Società Partecipate dagli Enti Locali. Rapporto 2007, Roma: Retecamere.
51. Utilitatis. 2007. GreenBook. Aspetti Economici della Gestione dei Rifiuti Urbani in Italia, Roma: Rapporto Utilitatis.
52. Vagliasindi, M. 2008. " Governance arrangements for state owned enterprises ". In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 4542, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
53. Villalonga, B. 2000. Privatisation and efficiency: differentiating ownership from political, organizational, and dynamic effects. Journal of economic behavior and organization, 42: 43 - 74.
54. Warner, M. and Bel, G. 2008. " Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatisation of local public services in the US and Spain ". In Public administration 723 - 735.
55. Warner, M.E. and Hebdon, R. 2001. Local government restructuring: privatisation and its alternatives. Journal of policy analysis and management, 20: 315 - 336.
56. Warner, M.E. and Hefetz, A. 2008. Managing markets for public service: the role of mixed public-private delivery of city services. Public administration review, 68 (1): 155 - 166.