Managing in-vehicle distractions - Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm

AutomotiveUI 2010 - 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4-11

  Hibberd, Daz L ^a   Jamson, Samantha L ^a   Carsten, Oliver M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; Driver safety; Human machine interface; In vehicle tasks; Psychological refractory period; Simulator

Indexed keywords

DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVER SAFETY; HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE; IN-VEHICLE TASK; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; REFRACTORY MATERIALS; USER INTERFACES;

VEHICLES;

EID: 79955963916     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1969773.1969775     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Allen, P.A., Smith, A. F., Vires-Collins, H. and Sperry, S. 1998. The Psychological Refractory Period: Evidence for Age Differences in Attentional Time-Sharing. Psychology & Aging 13(2): p. 218-229. (Pubitemid 28312316)
2. Alm, H. and Nilsson, L. 1995. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 27(5): p. 707-715.
3. Brebner, J. 1977. The Search for Exceptions to the Psychological Refractory Period, in Attention & Performance VI, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Attention and Performance (Stockholm, Sweden, July 28-Aug 1, 1975). S. Dornic, Editor. 1977, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Hillsdale, New Jersey. p. 63-78.
4. Damiani, S., Deregibus, E. and Andreone, L. 2009. Driver-vehicle interfaces and interaction: where are they going? European Transport Research Review 1(2): p. 87-96.
5. Dutta, D. and Walker. B. N. 1995. Persistence of the PRP Effect: Evaluating the Response-Selection Bottleneck. in 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Los Angeles, CA.
6. Glass, J. M., Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E. and Meyer, D. E. 2000. Aging and the Psychological Refractory Period: Task-Coordination Strategies in Young and Old Adults. Psychology & Aging, 15(4): p. 571-595.
7. Hartley, A.A. and Maquestiaux, F. 2007. Success and Failure at Dual-Task Coordination by Younger and Older Adults. Psychology & Aging 22(2): p. 215-222. (Pubitemid 47445151)
8. Hein, G. and Schubert, T. 2004. Aging and Input Processing in Dual-Task Situations. Psychology & Aging 19(3): p. 416-432. (Pubitemid 39129539)
9. Horrey, W.J., Lesch, M. F. and Garabet, A. 2008. Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention 40(2): p. 675-682. (Pubitemid 351329260)
10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2004. Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Specification and compliance procedures for in-vehicle auditory presentation (ISO 15006). Geneva, Switzerland.
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2002. Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Dialogue management principles and compliance procedures (ISO 15005). Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Karlin, L. and Kestenbaum, R. 1968. Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(2): p. 167 - 178.
13. Levy, J., Pashler, H. and Boer, E. 2006. Central Interference in Driving: Is There Any Stopping the Psychological Refractory Period? Psychological Science 17(3): p. 228-235. (Pubitemid 43344731)
14. McKnight, A.J. and McKnight, A. S. 1993. The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis & Prevention 25(3): p. 259-265.
15. Pashler, H. 1994. Dual-Task Interference in Simple Tasks: Data and Theory. Psychological Bulletin 116(2): p. 220-244. (Pubitemid 24976769)
16. Pashler, H. 1990. Do Response Modality Effects Support Multiprocessor Models of Divided Attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(4): p. 826-842.
17. Pashler, H. 1984. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10(3): p. 358-377.
18. Ranney, T.A., Harbluk, J. L. and Noy, Y. I. 2005. Effects of Voice Technology on Test Track Driving Performance: Implications for Driver Distraction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47(2): p. 439-454. (Pubitemid 47046853)
19. Roberts, S. and Sternberg, S. 1993. The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives, in Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press. p. 611-653.
20. Smith, M.C. 1967. Theories of the Psychological Refractory Period. Psychological Bulletin 67(3): p. 202-213.
21. Strayer, D.L., Drews, F. A. and Johnston, W. A. 2003. Cell Phone-Induced Failures of Visual Attention During Simulated Driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9(1): p. 23-32. (Pubitemid 38360929)
22. Stutts, J.C., et al. 2001. The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety: Washington DC.
23. Telford, C.W. 1931. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 14(1): p. 1-36.
24. Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E. and Johnston, J. C. 1999. Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25(5): p. 1268-1283.
25. Welford, A.T. 1959. Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11(4): p. 193 - 210.
26. Welford, A.T. 1952. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 43: p. 2-19.
27. Wickens, C.D. 2002. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3(2): p. 159-177.
28. Wickens, C.D. 1984. Processing Resources in Attention, in Varieties of Attention, ed. R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davies, Editors. London. p. 63-98.
29. Young, K. and Regan, M. 2007. Driver distraction: A review of the literature. In Distracted driving, ed. I.J. Faulks, et al. Australasian College of Road Safety: Sydney, NSW. p. 379-405.