Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a)

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Froghi, Saied ^a,b   Ahmed, Kamran ^a,b   Khan, Mohammad S ^a,b   Dasgupta, Prokar ^a,b   Challacombe, Ben ^a,b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

partial nephrectomy; renal cell cancer; robot assisted laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SMALL RENAL TUMOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; RENAL CELL CANCER; ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84880779403     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12053     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM, Tannir NM, Tamboli P, Sandler CM,. Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1220-1232
2. Sun M, Abdollah F, Bianchi M, et al. Treatment management of small renal masses in the 21st Century: a paradigm shift. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2380-2387
3. Minervini A, Siena G, Carini M,. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: the next gold standard for the treatment of intracapsular renal tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011; 11: 1779-1782
4. Alcaraz A,. Nephron-sparing surgery: some considerations regarding an underused standard of care. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 346-348
5. Scandola M, Grespan L, Vicentini M, Fiorini P,. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five metaanalyses. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 705-715
6. Coronado PJ, Herraiz MA, Magrina JF, Fasero M, Vidart JA,. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 165: 289-294
7. Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 514-521
8. Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS Jr, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ,. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2012; 188: 45-50
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
10. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF,. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896-1900
11. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13
12. Wong WC, Cheung CS, Hart GJ,. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2008; 5: 23
13. Stang A,. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
14. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 413-424
15. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM,. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1033-1039
16. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB,. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology 2009; 73: 306-310
17. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009; 182: 866-872
18. Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2008; 180: 2353-2356
19. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V,. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 127-132
20. Passerotti CC, Pessoa R, da Cruz JA, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience in Brazil and a review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol 2012; 38: 69-76
21. Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 325-330
22. White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7. Urology 2011; 77: 809-813
23. Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 310-316
24. Michli EE, Parra RO,. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 2009; 73: 302-305
25. Jeong W, Park SY, Lorenzo EI, Oh CK, Han WK, Rha KH,. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1457-1460
26. Ho H, Schwentner C, Neururer R, Steiner H, Bartsch G, Peschel R,. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes at 1 year. BJU Int 2009; 103: 663-668
27. Bhayani SB, Das N,. Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma: retrospective review of surgical outcomes of 35 cases. BMC Surg 2008; 8: 16
28. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008; 22: 947-952
29. Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD,. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 2006; 176: 36-39
30. Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, Palese MA,. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS 2011; 15: 291-297
31. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol 2005; 173: 1690-1694
32. Jeon HG, Choi KH, Kim KH, Rha KH, Yang SC, Han WK,. Comparison of video-assisted minilaparotomy, open, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53: 151-157
33. Olweny EO, Park SK, Seideman CA, Best SL, Cadeddu JA,. Self-retaining barbed suture for parenchymal repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; initial clinical experience. BJU Int 2012; 109: 906-909
34. Haber GP, Lee MC, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Gill IS,. Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation. BJU Int 2012; 109: 118-124
35. Simmons MN, Gill IS,. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. J Urol 2007; 177: 2067-2073
36. Häcker A, Albadour A, Jauker W, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumours: acceleration and facilitation of the laparoscopic technique. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 358-365
37. Venkatesh R, Weld K, Ames CD, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effect of tumor location. Urology 2006; 67: 1169-1174
38. Weld KJ, Venkatesh R, Huang J, Landman J,. Evolution of surgical technique and patient outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 502-507
39. Baughman S,. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A novel transperitoneal technique. Contemp Urol 2005; 17: 34-43
40. Johnston WK 3rd, Montgomery JS, Seifman BD, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS Jr,. Fibrin glue v sutured bolster: lessons learned during 100 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. J Urol 2005; 174: 47-52
41. Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Tolhurst SR, et al. Simplifying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technical considerations for reproducible outcomes. Urology 2005; 66: 976-980
42. Beasley KA, Al Omar M, Shaikh A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy. Urology 2004; 64: 458-461
43. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 41-46
44. Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR, Sroka M, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR,. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate. J Urol 2006; 176: 1984-1989
45. Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Nguyen MM, Desai MM, Gill IS,. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int 2008; 102: 86-92
46. Hillyer SP, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors: single-institution comparative analysis. Urology 2011; 78: 808-812
47. Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I, Akpinar H,. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1491-1497
48. Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS,. Operative Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Korean. J Urol 2011; 52: 279-283
49. Williams S, Kacker R, Alemozaffar M, Francisco IS, Mechaber J, Wagner AA,. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon's experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program. World J Urol 2011; [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0648-5
50. Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754-758
51. Kaouk JH, Goel RK,. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1163-1169
52. Lee NG, Zampini A, Tuerk I,. Single surgeon's experience with laparoscopic versus robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative outcomes/complications and influence of tumor characteristics on choice of therapy. Can J Urol 2012; 19: 6465-6470
53. Lavallee LT, Desantis D, Kamal F, et al. The association between renal tumour scoring systems and ischemia time during open partial nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 19: 1-8
54. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL,. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108: 876-881
55. Bylund JR, Gayheart D, Fleming T, et al. Association of Tumor Size, Location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and Centrality Index Score with Perioperative Outcomes and Postoperative Renal Function. J Urol 2012; 188: 1684-1689
56. Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P,. Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 743-747
57. Elsamra SE, Leone AR, Lasser MS, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost. J Endourol 2013; 27: 182-188
58. Shapiro E, Benway BM, Wang AJ, Bhayani SB,. The role of nephron-sparing robotic surgery in the management of renal malignancy. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 76-80
59. Riggs SB, Larochelle JC, Belldegrun AS,. Partial nephrectomy: a contemporary review regarding outcomes and different techniques. Cancer J 2008; 14: 302-307
60. Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 186-192
61. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC,. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012; 187: 1392-1398
62. Sodergren M, Yang GZ, Darzi A,. Perception and orientation in minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 210-211
63. Jl B, Draaisma WA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, et al. Impact of surgeon experience on 5-year outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 340-346
64. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME,. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 2011; 78: 813-819
65. Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. 'Zero ischemia' partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 128-134
66. Abreu AL, Gill IS, Desai MM,. Zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar tumours. BJU Int 2011; 108: 948-954
67. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 1023-1033