Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 165, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 289-294

  Coronado, Pluvio J ^a   Herraiz, Miguel A ^a   Magrina, Javier F ^b   Fasero, María ^c   Vidart, Jose A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL LA ZARZUELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cost; Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Robotic; Survival

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYSTOTOMY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; GAS EMBOLISM; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; NERVE INJURY; OPERATION DURATION; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARITY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME; URETER INJURY;

EID: 84870293594     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Cancer Society Cancer facts and figures 2010 2010 American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA
2. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN, 2008. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.
3. J.F. Magrina Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 17 2005 343 346
4. A. Obermair, M. Janda, and J. Baker Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial European Journal of Cancer 48 2012 1147 1153
5. R. Berguer, D.L. Forkey, and W.D. Smith Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery Surgical Endoscopy 13 1999 466 468
6. D.M. Herron, M. Marohn SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group A consensus document on robotic surgery Surgical Endoscopy 22 2008 313
7. S. Pecorelli Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 105 2009 103 104
8. J. Boggess, P. Gehrig, and L. Cantrell A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 19 2008 360 362
9. M.C. Bell, J. Torgerson, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, A.W. Suttle, and S. Hunt Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques Gynecologic Oncology 111 2008 407 411
10. J. Cardenas-Goicoechea, S. Adams, S.B. Bhat, and T.C. Randall Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center Gynecologic Oncology 117 2010 224 228
11. S.A. DeNardis, R.W. Holloway, G.E. Bigsby 4th, D.P. Pikaart, S. Ahmad, and N.J. Finkler Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer Gynecologic Oncology 111 2008 412 417
12. D.S. Veljovich, P.J. Paley, C.W. Drescher, E.N. Everett, C. Shah, and W.A. Peters 3rd Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198 6 2008 679 e1 6799 e9 [discussion e9-10]
13. P.A. Gehrig, L.A. Cantrell, A. Shafer, L.N. Abaid, A. Mendivil, and J.F. Boggess What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecologic Oncology 111 2008 41 45
14. L.G. Seamon, D.E. Cohn, and M.S. Henretta Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecologic Oncology 113 2009 36 41
15. M. Reza, S. Maeso, J.A. Blasco, and E. Andradas Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery British Journal of Surgery 97 2010 1772 1783
16. J. Fanning, B. Fenton, and M. Purohit Robotic radical hysterectomy American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198 649 2008 e1 e4
17. A. Subramaniam, K.H. Kim, and S.A. Bryant A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma Gynecologic Oncology 12 2011 604 607
18. L.G. Seamon, D.E. Cohn, D.L. Richardson, S. Valmadre, M.J. Carlson, G.S. Phillips, and J.M. Fowler Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer Obstetrics and Gynecology 112 2008 1207 1213
19. J.F. Magrina, A. Mariani, and P.M. Magtibay Laparoscopy for endometrial cancer Nezhat's operative gynecologic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy third edition 2008 Cambridge University Press 465-474
20. F. Zullo, S. Palomba, and T. Russo A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193 2005 1344 1352
21. R. Sarle, A. Tewari, A. Shrivastava, J. Peabody, and M. Menon Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills Journal of Endourology 18 2004 63 66 [discussion 6-7]
22. A.G. Visco, and A.P. Advincula Robotic gynecologic surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology 112 2008 1369 1384
23. D.S. Veljovich, P.J. Paley, C.W. Drescher, E.N. Everett, C. Shah, and W.A. Peters 3rd Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198 679 2008 e1 e10
24. R.P. Pasic, J.A. Rizzo, H. Fang, S. Ross, M. Moore, and C. Gunnarsson Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 17 2010 730 738
25. D. Sarlos, L. Kots, N. Stevanovic, and G. Schaer Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 150 2010 92 96
26. M.P. Lowe, P.R. Johnson, S.A. Kamelle, S. Kumar, D.H. Chamberlain, and T.D. Tillmanns A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer Obstetrics and Gynecology 114 2009 236 243
27. P.C. Lim, E.Y. Kang, and D.H. Park A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients Gynecologic Oncology 120 2011 413 418
28. G. Gaia, R.W. Holloway, L. Santoro, S. Ahmad, E. Di Silverio, and A. Spinillo Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches. A Systematic Review Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 1422 1431
29. R.W. Holloway, S. Ahmad, and S.A. DeNardis Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance Gynecol Oncol 115 2009 447 452
30. W.T. Kim, W.S. Ham, W. Jeong, H.J. Song, K.H. Rha, and Y.D. Choi Failure and malfunction of da Vinci Surgical Systems during various Robotic surgeries: experience from six departments at a single institute Urology 74 2009 1234 1237
31. D.O. Holtz, G. Miroshnichenko, M.O. Finnegan, M. Hernick, and Dunton CJ Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 17 2010 500 503
32. S. Lau, Z. Vaknin, A.V. Ramana-Kumar, D. Halliday, E.L. Franco, and W.H. Gotlieb Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology 119 2012 717 724