Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of short-term outcomes and cost

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 182-188

  Elsamra, Sammy E ^a   Leone, Andrew R ^a   Lasser, Michael S ^a   Thavaseelan, Simone ^a   Golijanin, Dragan ^a   Haleblian, George E ^a   Pareek, Gyan ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIEMETIC AGENT; CREATININE; HEMOGLOBIN; MORPHINE;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANEMIA; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG COST; DRUG USE; FOLEY BALLOON CATHETER; HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMATURIA; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY INJURY; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; NEPHROMETRY; OPERATING ROOM PERSONNEL; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL LEAK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TUMOR VOLUME; URETER STENT; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84873885454     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0210     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for Management of Clinical Stage 1 Renal Mass, AUA Education and Research, 2009, (www.auanet.org)
2. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1, 800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41-46.
3. Knotkova H, Fine PG, Portenoy RK. Opioid rotation: The science and the limitations of the equianalgesic dose table. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:426-439.
4. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
5. Strup SE, Garrett Jenne, Gomella LG. Techniques in en-dourology laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Hand-assisted technique. J Endourol 2005;19:456-460.
6. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004; 64:914-918.
7. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004 23;351:1296-1305.
8. Wolf JS, Seifman BD, Montie JE. Nephron sparing surgery for suspected malignancy: Open surgery compared to lap-aroscopy with selective use of hand assistance. J Urol 2000; 163:1659-1664.
9. Stifelman MD, Sosa E, Nakada SY. Hand-assisted laparo-scopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2001;15:161-164.
10. Brown JA, Hubosky SG, Gomella LG. Hand assisted lapa-roscopic partial nephrectomy for peripheral and central lesions: A review of 30 consecutive cases. J Urol 2004;171: 1443-1446.
11. Strup SE, Hubosky S. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2004;18:345-349.
12. Bylund JR, Clark CJ, Cripsen PL, et al. Hand-assisted lapa-roscopic partial nephrectomy without formal collecting system closure: Perioperative outcomes in 104 consecutive patients. J Endourol 2011;25:1853-1857.
13. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: An international experience. Eur Urol 2010;57:815-822.
14. Benway BM, Bhayani SB. Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial Nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011;108:955-961.
15. Munver R, Yates J, Sundaram C, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in 1035 consecutive cases: a multi-institutional experience. J Urol 2011;4S (Supplement):185.
16. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrec-tomy for renal tumors: A multiinstitutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009;182:866-872.
17. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182: 844-853.
18. Stroup S, Kopp R, Sntomauro M, et al. Renal nephrometry score and selection of operative modality for partial ne-phrectomy. J Urol 2011;185:4S (supplement):963.
19. Kenney P, Kozinn S, Lebeis C, et al. The Renal Nephrometry Scoring System Is Predictive Of Partial Nephrectomy Complexity. J Urol 2011;185;4S (Supplement):963.
20. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, et al. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. UROL 2011;78:813-819.
21. Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, et al. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: The learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS 2011;15:291-297.
22. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedgenephrectomy: A comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008;22:947-952.
23. Kotlikoff L. Fixing health care before it fixes us. Urol Clin N Am 2009;36:29-36.
24. Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Avallone MA. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses. Urol-Oncol 2012. [Epub ahead of print] Feb 2012 PMID 22361086.
25. Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, et al. Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Partial Nephrectomy, J Endourol 2011;25:447-453.