On relationship between self-construal and individual behavior in video-mediated multicultural group decision making

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8024 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2013, Pages 247-256

  Li, Hui ^a   Rau, Pei Luen Patrick ^a   Zhao, Xiaobo ^a   Salvendy, Gavriel ^a,b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

culture; group decision making; multicultural group; self construal; video mediated communication

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

CULTURAL VARIABILITY; GROUP DECISION MAKING; INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; MULTICULTURAL GROUPS; SELF-CONSTRUAL; VIDEO-MEDIATED COMMUNICATIONS; VIDEOCONFERENCING SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84880737059     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39137-8_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Barry, B., Stewart, G.L.: Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1), 62-78 (1997)
2. Brewer, M.B., Chen, Y.: Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review 114(1), 133-151 (2007)
3. Bruce, V.: The role of the face in communication: Implications for videophone design. Interacting with Computers 8(2), 166-176 (1996)
4. Connaughton, S.L., Shuffler, M.: Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A review and future agenda. Small Group Research 38(3), 387-412 (2007)
5. Cross, S.E., Bacon, P.L., Morris, M.L.: The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(4), 791-808 (2000)
6. Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., Barrett, P.: A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences 6(1), 21-29 (1985)
7. Ferran, C., Watts, S.: Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model. Management Science 54(9), 1565-1578 (2008)
8. Hardin, A.M., Fuller, M.A., Davison, R.M.: I know I can, but can we?: Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research 38(1), 130-155 (2007)
9. Hofstede, G.: Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)
10. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M., Vinken, H.: VSM 2008 (Values Survey Module) (2008), http://www.geerthofstede.nl/vsm-08 (retrieved December 20, 2012)
11. Isaacs, E.A., Tang, J.C.: What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study. Multimedia Systems 2(2), 63-73 (1994)
12. Li, J.: Demographic diversity, tokenism, and their effects on group interaction processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (1993)
13. Li, J., Karakowsky, L., Siegel, J.P.: The effects of proportional representation on intragroup behavior in mixed-race decision-making groups. Small Group Research 30(3), 259-279 (1999)
14. Li, H., Rau, P.P., Salvendy, G.: The Effect of Mixed American-Chinese Group Composition on Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries (2012) (in press), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.20391/full (Online early view retrieved December 20, 2012)
15. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98(2), 224-253 (1991)
16. McLeod, P.L.: An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 7(3), 257-280 (1992)
17. Myers, I.B.: Introduction to Type, 5th edn. Consulting Psychologist Press, California (1993)
18. Oetzel, J.G.: Culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups: Explaining communication processes through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22(2), 135-161 (1998a)
19. Oetzel, J.G.: Explaining individual communication processes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. Human Communication Research 25(2), 202-224 (1998b)
20. Oetzel, J.G.: Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research 32(1), 19-54 (2001)
21. Roger, N., Karen, L.H.: The effects of culture and cohesiveness on intragroup conflict and effectiveness. Journal of Social Psychology 143(5), 613 (2003)
22. Sedikides, C., Brewer, M.B.: Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents, or strangers? In: Sedikides, C., Brewer, M.B. (eds.) Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Psychology Press, Florence (2001)
23. Storck, J.S.: Oh Say, Can You See: The Impact of Video Communication on Attention, Workload, and Decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Boston University (1995)
24. van der Kleij, R., Paashuis, R., Langefeld, J.J., Schraagen, J.: Effects of long-term use of video-communication technologies on the conversational process. Cognition, Technology & Work 6(1), 57-59 (2004)
25. Wainfan, L., Davis, P.: Virtual collaboration: Face-to-face versus videoconference, audioconference, and computer-mediated communications. In: Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VIII, vol. 5423, pp. 384-873 (2004)
26. Yellen, R.E., Winniford, M., Sanford, C.C.: Extraversion and introversion in electronically- supported meetings. Information & Management 28(1), 63-74 (1995)
27. Zhang, D., Lowry, P., Zhou, L., Fu, X.: The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(4), 53-80 (2007) Scholars of China