Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model

Management Science

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1565-1578

  Ferran, Carlos ^a   Watts, Stephanie ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive workload; Computer mediated communications; Heuristic systematic model; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE DEMANDS; COGNITIVE LOADS; COGNITIVE THEORIES; COGNITIVE WORKLOAD; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATIONS; FACE-TO-FACE COMMUNICATIONS; FIELD STUDIES; HEURISTIC SYSTEMATIC MODEL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIKEABILITY; MAIN EFFECTS; MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS; PROCESS INFORMATIONS; PROCESSING MODELS; RESEARCH USE; THEORETICAL MODELS; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

COMMUNICATION; HEURISTIC METHODS;

TELECONFERENCING;

EID: 61849128391     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0879     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alavi, M., B. C. Wheeler, J. S. Valacich. 1995. Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quart. 19(3) 293-312.
2. Anderson, A. H., A. Newlands, J. Mullin, A. M. Fleming, G. Doherty-Sneddon, J. Van der Velden. 1996. Impact of video-mediated communication on simulated service encounters. Interacting Comput. 8(2) 193-206.
3. Bailey, J. E., S. W Pearson. 1983. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. 29(5) 530-546.
4. Baron, R. M., D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6) 1173-1182.
5. Bogner, W C., P. S. Barr. 2000. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ. Sci. 11(2) 212.
6. Brazel, J. F., C. P. Agoglia, R. C. Hatfield. 2004. Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance. Accounting Rev. 79(4) 949.
7. Browne, M. W., R. Cudeck. 1992. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Social. Methods Res. 21(2) 230-258.
8. Campbell, J. A. 1998. Participation in videoconferenced meetings: User disposition and meeting context. Inform. Management 34(6) 329-338.
9. Chaiken, S. 1979. Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8) 1387-1397.
10. Chaiken, S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5) 752-766.
11. Chaiken, S., A. H. Eagly. 1983. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2) 241-256.
12. Chaiken, S., A. Liberman, A. H. Eagly. 1989. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh, eds. Unintended Thought. Guilford Press, New York, 212-252.
13. Chidambaram, L. 1996. Relational development in computersupported groups. MIS Quart. 20(2) 143-166.
14. Cohen, A. R. 1957. Need for cognition and order of communication as determinants of opinion change. C. I. Hovland, ed. The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 79-97.
15. Crede, M., J. A. Sniezek. 2003. Group judgment processes and out-comes in video-conferencing versus face-to-face groups. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 59(6) 875-897.
16. Daft, R. L., R. H. Lengel. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5) 554-571.
17. Davids, M. 1999. Smiling for the camera. J. Bus. Strategy 20(3) 20-24.
18. Davis, A. W., M. F. Beattie, A. H. Nilssen. 2004. Rich media conferencing, Vol. 2: Enterprise Group and Personal Videoconferencing Clients. Report RP-RMC04-V2, Wainhouse Research, Brookline, MA.
19. Deutsch, M., H. B. Gerard. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 51 624-636.
20. Doherty-Sneddon, G., A. Anderson, C. O'Malley, S. Langton, S. Garrod, V. Bruce. 1997. Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. 3(2) 105-125.
21. Eagly, A. H., S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Hartcourt Brace College Publishers, New York.
22. Eagly, A. H., R. D. Ashmore, M. G. Makhijani, L. C. Longo. 1991. What is beautiful is good, but... : A meta-analytic review of research on physical attractiveness stereotype. Psych. Bull. 110(1) 109-128.
23. Ferran-Urdaneta, C., J. Storck. 1997. Truth or deception: The impact of videoconferencing for job interviews. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf Inform. Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, 183-196.
24. Fulk, J. 1993. Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. 36(5) 921-950.
25. Gilly, M. C., J. L. Graham, M. F. Wolfinbarger, L. J. Yale. 1998. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 26(2) 83-100.
26. Hart, S. G., L. E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. P. A. Hancock, N. Meshkati, eds. Human Mental Workload, Vol. 52. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 139-183.
27. Hill, S. G., H. P. Iavecchia, J. C. Byers, A. C. Bittner, A. L. Zaklad, R. E. Christ. 1992. Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors 34 429-439.
28. Jonasson, D. H., H. I. Kwon. 2001. Communication patterns in computer-mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Tech. Res. Development 49 35-51.
29. Kelman, H. C. 1961. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. 25(1) 57-78.
30. Kiesler, S., L. Sproull. 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52 96-123.
31. Liberman, A., S. Chaiken. 1996. The direct effect of personal relevance on attitudes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(3) 269-279.
32. MacKinnon, D., C. Lockwood, J. Hoffman, S. West, V. Sheets. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7(1) 83-104.
33. McGuire, W J. 1969. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 3, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 136-314.
34. Mennecke, B. E., J. S. Valacich, B. C. Wheeler. 2000. The effects of media and task on user performance: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Group Decision Negotiation 9(6) 507-529.
35. Morgan-Lopez, A. A., D. P. MacKinnon. 2006. Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behav. Res. Methods 38(1) 77-87.
36. Muller, D., V. Y. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd. 2005. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6) 852-863.
37. Nunnally, J. C., I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
38. O'Conaill, B., S. Whittaker, S. Wilbur. 1993. Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human Comput. Interaction 8(4) 389-428.
39. O'Malley, C., S. Langton, A. Anderson, G. Doherty-Sneddon, V. Bruce. 1996. Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting Comput. 8(2) 177-192.
40. Olson, G. M., J. S. Olson. 1997. Making sense of the findings: Common vocabulary leads to the synthesis necessary for theory building. K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, S. B. Wilbur, eds. Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 75-92.
41. Petty, R. E., J. T. Cacioppo. 1986a. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer-Verlag, New York.
42. Petty, R. E., J. T. Cacioppo. 1986b. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19. Academic Press, New York, 123-205.
43. Reger, R. K., T. B. Palmer. 1996. Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1) 22-39.
44. Rice, R. E., G. Love. 1987. Electronic emotion. Comm. Res. 14 85-108.
45. Robert, L. P., A. R. Dennis. 2005. Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 48(1) 10-21.
46. Rubio, S., E. Díaz, J. Martín, J. M. Puente. 2004. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: A comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl. Psych.: An Internat. Rev. 53(1) 61-86.
47. Sanford, A., A. H. Anderson, J. Mullin. 2004. Audio channel constraints in video-mediated communication. Interacting Comput. 16 1069-1094.
48. Sellen, A. 1995. Remote conversations-The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human Comput. Interaction 10(4) 401-444.
49. Shachtman, N. 2007. Pentagon preps mind fields for smarter war stations. Wired News (March 21), http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/ 2007/03/72996?currentPage=all.
50. Short, J., E. Williams, B. Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, New York.
51. Sproull, L., S. Kiesler. 1986. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32(11) 1492-1512.
52. Stamm, K., R. Dube. 1994. The relationship of attitudinal components to trust in media. Comm. Res. 21(1) 105-123.
53. Storck, J. S. 1995. Oh say, can you see: The impact of video communication on attention, workload, and decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
54. Suh, K. S. 1999. Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Inform. Management 35(5) 295.
55. Suh, K. S., A. M. Jenkins. 1992. A comparison of linear keyword and restricted natural language data base interfaces for novice users. Inform. Systems Res. 3(3) 252-272.
56. Sumner, M., D. Hostetler. 2002. A comparative study of computer conferencing and face-to-face communications in systems design. J. Interaction Learn. Res. 13 277-291.
57. Sussman, S. W., W. S. Seigal. 2003. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1) 47-66.
58. Sussman, S. W., L. Sproull. 1999. Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communications. Inform. Systems Res. 10(2) 150-166.
59. Taylor, S. E., S. C. Thompson. 1982. Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. Psych. Rev. 89(2) 155-181.
60. Trumbo, C. W 2002. Information processing and risk perception: An adaptation of the heuristic-systematic model. J. Comm. 52(2) 367-382.
61. Walther, J. B. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comm. Res. 19(1) 52-90.
62. Webster, J. 1998. Desktop videoconferencing: Experiences of complete users, wary users, and non-users. MIS Quart. 22(3) 257-286.
63. Weinstein, I. M., A. W Davis. 2005. The business case for videoconferencing. White paper, Wainhouse Research, Brookline, MA. http://www.wrplatinum.com/BekijkSamenvatting.asp?Inhoudsnummer=3463.
64. Weisband, S. P., S. K. Schneider, T. Connolly. 1995. Computer-mediated communication and social information: Social salience and status differences. Acad. Management J. 38(4) 1124-1151.