Physiological assessment of in vivo human knee articular cartilage using sodium MR imaging at 1.5T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1059-1067

  Hani, Ahmad Fadzil Mohd ^a   Kumar, Dileep ^a   Malik, Aamir Saeed ^a   Razak, Ruslan ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^b Pantai Hospital   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Articular cartilage; Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Physiology; Sodium concentration; Sodium MRI

Indexed keywords

PROTEOGLYCAN; SODIUM; SODIUM 23;

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84880720930     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lubar WPD, Callahan LF, Chang RW, Helmick CG, Lappin DR, Melnick A, et al. 2010. A National Public Health Agenda for Osteoarthritis 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. Available: URL: http://www.arthritis.org/media/Ad%20Council%20101/OA_Agenda_2010.pdf.
2. Akinpelu A.O., Alonge T.O., Adekanla B.A., Odole A.C. Prevalence and pattern of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in Nigeria: a community-based study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 2009, 7.
3. Kiviranta P., Töyräs J., Nieminen M.T., Laasanen M.S., Saarakkala S., Nieminen H.J., et al. Comparision of novel clinically applicable methodology for sensitivite diagnostics of cartilage degeneration. Eur Cell Mater 2007, 13:46-55.
4. Mow V.C., Setton L.A. Mechanical properties of normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis 1998, 102-122. Oxford University Press. K.D. Brandt, M. Doherty (Eds.).
5. Sun F., Wu Z., Shao X., Wang Y., Zhang L., Niu H. The characteristics of ultrasound speed and attenuation in progressive trypsin digested articular cartilage. presented at the 3rd International Conference Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE) 2009, 1-3.
6. Mallikarjuna Swamy M.S., Holi M.S. Knee joint cartilage visualization and quantification in normal and osteoarthritis. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology 2010, 16-18.
7. Jazrawi L.M., Alaia M.J., Chang G., FitzGerald E.F., Recht M.P. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011, 19:420-429.
8. Madelin G., Chang G., Otazo R., Jerschow A., Regatte R.R. Compressed sensing sodium MRI of cartilage at 7T: preliminary study. J Magn Reson 2012, 214(1):360-365.
9. Madelin G., Lee J.-S., Inati S., Jerschow A., Regatte R.R. Sodium inversion recovery MRI of the knee joint in vivo at 7T. J Magn Reson 2010, 207(1):42-52.
10. Wheaton A.J., Borthakur A., Shapiro E.M., Regatte R.R., Akella S.V., Kneeland J.B., et al. Proteoglycan loss in human knee cartilage: quantitation with sodium MR imaging-feasibility study. Radiology 2004, 231:900-905.
11. Akella S.V., Regatte R.R., Gougoutas A.J., Borthakur A., Shapiro E.M., Kneeland J.B., et al. Proteoglycan-induced changes in T1ρ-relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T. Magn Reson Med 2001, 46:419-423.
12. Zheng S., Xia Y. The impact of the relaxivity definition on the quantitative measurement of glycosaminoglycans in cartilage by the MRI dGEMRIC method. Magn Reson Med 2010, 61:25-32.
13. Borthakur A.E.M., Niyogi Sampreet, Witschey Walter, Bruce Kneeland J., Reddy Ravinder Sodium and T1ρ MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage. NMR Biomed 2006, 19:781-821.
14. Gabrielle Blumenkrantz, Majumdar S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Eur Cell Mater 2007, 12:75-86.
15. Hani AFM, Kumar D, Malik AS, Walter N. Non-invasive sodium MR imaging and quantification of in-vivo articular cartilage at 1.5Tesla. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2012; Vol 20, Supplement 1, No-17, S10-S53,.
16. Shapiro E.M., Borthakur A., Beers J., Kudchodkar S., Kneeland J.B., Reddy R. Sensitivity of MRI to proteoglycan depletion in cartilage: comparison of sodium and proton MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000, 8:288-293.
17. Bitar G.L.Richard, Perng Richard, Tadros Sameh, Moody Alan R., Sarrazin Josee, McGregor Caitlin, et al. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics 2006, 26:513-526.
18. Adil B. Sodium NMR relaxation parameters in cartilage: implications for MR imaging. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1995.
19. Moser Ewald, Meyerspeer Florian Ph Martin, Fischmeister S., Grabner Günther, Bauer Herbert, Trattnig Siegfried Windows on the human body-in vivo high-field magnetic resonance research and applications in medicine and psychology. Sensors 2010, 10:5724-5757.
20. 23Na MRI accurately measures fixed charge density in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2002, 47:284-291.
21. Zbyn S., Stelzeneder D., G. H. Welsch, L. L. Negrin, V. Juras, P. Szomolanyi1,5, R. Dorotka2, and S. Trattnig1. "Sodium (23Na) MR imaging at 7T for the evaluation of repair tissue quality in patients after two cartilage repair procedures. 2011; Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 19.
22. 23Na MRI. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2000, 8.
23. Moon C., Kim J.-H., Zhao T., He X., Park B.-W., Bae K. In vivo sodium and proton T1rho MR imaging of human knee cartilage at 3T. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2011, 19:3217.
24. Staroswiecki E., Bangerter N.K., Gurney P.T., Grafendorfer T., Gold G.E., Hargreaves B.A. In vivo sodium imaging of human patellar cartilage with a 3D cones sequence at 3T and 7T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 32(2):446-451.