Distribution of periphytic algae in wetlands (palm swamps, Cerrado), Brazil;Distribuição de algas perifíticas em áreas úmidas (Veredas, Cerrado), Brasil

Brazilian Journal of Biology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 331-346

  Dunck, B ^a   Nogueira, I S ^b   Felisberto, S A ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acidic water; Anthropogenic activity; Ecology; Epiphyton

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; CLASSIFICATION; EUKARYOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; WETLAND;

BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; EUKARYOTA; POPULATION DYNAMICS; WETLANDS;

EID: 84880707671     PISSN: 15196984     EISSN: 16784375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842013000200013     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. AGOSTINHO, AA, THOMAZ, SM. and GOMES, LC., 2005. Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil's Inland waters. Conservation Biology, vol. 19, p. 646-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00701.x
2. ALGARTE, VM., SIQUEIRA, NS., MURAMAKI, EA. and RODRIGUES, L., 2009. Effects of hydrological regime and connectivity on the interannual variation in taxonomic similarity of periphytic algae. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 69, p. 609-616. PMid:19738967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842009000300015
3. ALLAN, JD., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 35, p. 257-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
4. ANDERSEN, AN., 1999. My bioindicator or yours? Making the selection. Journal of Insect Conservation, vol. 3, p. 61-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017202329114
5. ANDRÉN, C. and JARLMAN, A., 2008. Benthic diatoms as indicators of acidity in streams. Fundamental and Applied Limnology. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, vol. 173, p. 237-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0173-0237
6. America Public Health Association - APHA, 2005. Standard methods for examination of water and wasterwater. 21nd ed. Washington: APHA.
7. BAKER, MA., GUZMAN, G. and OSTERMILLER, JD., 2009. Differences in nitrate uptake among benthic algal assemblages in a mountain stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, vol. 28, p. 24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/07-129.1
8. BICUDO, DC., 1990. Considerações sobre metodologias de contagem de algas do perifíton. Acta Limnologica Brasilica, vol. 3, p. 459-475.
9. BICUDO, CEM. and MENEZES, M., 2006. Gêneros de algas de águas continentais do Brasil (Chave de identificação e descrições). 2nd ed. São Carlos: Rima. 498 p.
10. BIGGS, BJF., 1996. Patterns in benthic algal of streams. In STEVENSON, RJ., BOTHWELL, ML. and LOWE, RL. (Eds.). Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. New York: Academic Press. p. 31-56.
11. BIGGS, JF., STEVENSON, RJ. and LOWE, RL., 1998. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, vol. 143, p. 21-56.
12. BLANCO, S., ECTOR, L. and BÉCARES, E., 2004. Epiphytic diatoms as water quality indicators in Spanish shallow lakes. Vie Milieu, vol. 54, p. 71-79.
13. BONNET, BRP., FERREIRA, NC. and FERREIRA, LG., 2007. Ampliação de ambientes ripários como alternativa ás reservas legais: conciliando política florestal e conservação dos recursos hídricos no Bioma Cerrado. Boletim Goiano de Geografia, vol. 27, p. 97-115.
14. BOURASSA, N. and CATTANEO, A. 2000. Responses of a lake outlet community to light and nutrient manipulation: effects on periphyton and invertebrate biomass and composition. Freshwater Biology, vol. 44, p. 629-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00610.x
15. Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 1992. Resoluções CONAMA de 1984 a 1991. 4. ed. Brasília: SEMAM/IBAMA. 245 p.
16. CAMPEAU, S., MURKIN, HR. and TITMAN, RD., 1994. Relative importance of algae and emergent plant litter to freshwater marsh invertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 51, p. 681-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f94-068
17. CARVALHO, PGS. 1991. As Veredas e sua importância no domínio dos Cerrados. Informe agropecuário, vol. 168, p. 47-54.
18. CATTANEO, A., KERIMIAN, T., ROBERGE, M. and MARTY, J., 1997. Periphyton distribution and abundance on substrata of different size along a gradient of stream trophy. Hydrobiologia, vol. 354, p. 101-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003027927600
19. COESEL, PFM., 1996. Biogeography of desmids. Hydrobiologia, vol. 336, p. 41-53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00010818
20. DE NICOLA, DM., 2000. A review of diatoms found in highly acidic environments. Hydrobiologia, vol. 433, p. 111-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004066620172
21. DODDS, WK., SMITH, VH. and ZANDER, B., 1997. Developing nutrient targets to control benthic chlorophyll levels in streams: a case study of the Clark Fork River. Water Research, vol. 31, p. 1738-1750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00389-2
22. DUFRÊNE, M. and LEGENDRE, P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need of asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, vol. 67, p. 345-366.
23. ELSER, JJ., BRACKEN, MES., CLELAND, EE., GRUNER, DS., HARPOLE, WS., HILLEBRAND, H., NGAI, JT., SEABLOOM, EW., SHURIN, JB. and SMITH, JE., 2007. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, vol. 10, p.1135-1142. PMid:17922835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x
24. Embrapa, 1999. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília: Embrapa. 412 p.
25. Environmental Protection Agency - EPA, 2006. The Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nation's Streams. Available from: . Access in: 22 Oct. 2010.
26. FELISBERTO, SA. and RODRIGUES, L., 2005. Influência do gradiente longitudinal (rio-barragem) na similaridade das comunidades de desmídias perifíticas. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, vol. 28, p. 241-254.
27. FERRAGUT, C. and BICUDO, DC., 2010. Periphytic algal community adaptive strategies in N and P enriched experiments in a tropical oligotrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia, vol. 646, p. 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0168-0
28. FERREIRA, IM., 2006. Modelos geomorfológicos das Veredas em ambiente de Cerrado. Espaço revista Geografia, vol. 7-8, p. 7-11.
29. GOLTERMAN, HL., CLYMO, RS. and OHMSTAD, MAM., 1978. Methods for physical and chemical analysis of fresh waters. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. 214 p.
30. GRAHAM, JÁ., Arancibia-Avila, P. and GRAHAN, LE., 1996. Physiological ecology of a species of the filamentous green alga Mougeotia under acidic conditions: Light and temperature effects on photosynthesis and respiration. Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 41, p. 253-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0253
31. HILL, MO. and GAUCH, HG., 1980. Detrend correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio, vol. 42, p. 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00048870
32. HILL, WR., 1996. Effects of light. In STEVENSON, RJ., BOTHWELL, ML. and LOWE, RL. (Eds.). Algal ecology: freshwater bentic ecosystems. New York: Academic Press. p. 121-148.
33. HILLEBRAND, H., DÜRSELEN, C., KIRSCHTEL, D., POLLINGHER, U. and ZOHARY, T., 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology, vol. 35, p. 403-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
34. KITCHING, RL, ORR, AG., THALIB, L., MITCHELL, H., HOPKINS, MS. and GRAHAM, AW., 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 37, p. 284-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00490.x
35. KRUSKAL, JB. and WISH, M., 1978. Multidimensional scaling: Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage publications. 111 p.
36. LAMPARELLI, MC., 2004. Grau de trofia em corpos d'água do estado de São Paulo: avaliação dos métodos de monitoramento. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo. 238 p. Tese de Doutorado em Ecologia Aplicada.
37. LARSON, CA., PASSY, SI. and LAANBROEK, R., 2012. Taxonomic and functional composition of the algal benthos exhibits similar successional trends in response to nutrient supply and current velocity. Federation of European Microbiological, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 352-62.
38. LEE, RE., 2008. Phycology. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press. 547 p.
39. LEELAHAKRIENGKRAI, P. and PEERAPORNPISAL, Y., 2010. Diversity of Benthic Diatoms and Water Quality of the Ping River, Northern Thailand. EnvironmentAsia, vol. 3, p. 82-94.
40. LEGENDRE, P. and LEGENDRE, L., 1998. Numerical ecology. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science. 853 p.
41. LIMA, JGC., SCHULZE, SMBB., RIBEIRO, MR. and BARRETO, SB., 2008. Mineralogia de um argissolo vermelho-amarelo da zona úmida costeira do estado de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Solo, vol. 32, p. 881-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832008000200042
42. LOBO, EA. and LEIGHTON, G., 1986. Estruturas de las fitocenosis planctônicas de los sistemas de desembocaduras de rios y esteros de La zona central de Chile. Revista de Biologia Marina, vol. 22, p. 143-170.
43. MARCARELLI, AM. and WURTSBAUGH, WA., 2006. Temperature and nutrients interact to control nitrogen fixation in oligotrophic streams: an experimental examination. Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 51, p. 2278-2289. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2278
44. MARCARELLI, AM., BECHTOLD, HA., RUGENSKI, AT. and INOUY, RS., 2009. Nutrient limitation of biofilm biomass and metabolism in the Upper Snake River basin, southeast Idaho, USA. Hydrobiologia, vol. 620, p. 63-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9615-6
45. MARGALEF, R., 1983. Limnologia. Barcelona: Ediciones Omega. 1009 p.
46. McCune, B. and MEFFORD, MJ., 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. version 4. Oregon: MJM Software Design.
47. McGeoch, MA., 1998. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biological Reviews, vol. 73, p. 181-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000632319700515X
48. MENEZES, M., 1986. Ficoflórula da Chapada dos Guimarães e arredores, Mato Grosso, Brasil: Euglenaceae e pigmentadas (Euglenophyceae). Rickia, vol. 13, p. 87-95.
49. MILLER, MC., DEOLIVEIRA, P. and GIBEAU, GG., 1992. Epilithic diatom community response to years of PO4 fertilization - Kuparuk River, Alaska (68 N Lat.). Hydrobiologia, vol. 240, p. 103-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00013456
50. Moreira-Filho, H. and Valente-Moreira, IM., 1981. Avaliação taxonômica e ecológica das diatomáceas (Bacillariophyceae) epífitas em algas pluricelulares obtidas nos litorais dos estados dos estados do Paraná, Santa Catarina e São Paulo. Boletim Museu Botânico Municipal, vol. 47, p. 1-17.
51. Moschini-Carlos, V., HENRY, R. and POMPÊO, MLM., 2000. Seasonal variation of biomass and productivity of the periphytic community on artificial substrata in the Jurumirim Reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil). Hydrobiologia, vol. 434, p. 35-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004086623922
52. PLANAS, D., 1996. Acidification effects. In STEVENSON, R.J., BOTHWELL, M.L. and LOWE, R.L. (Eds.). Algal ecology: freshwater bentic ecosystems. New York: Academic Press. p. 497-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012668450-6/50045-X
53. REICHARDT, E., 1999. Zur Revision der Gattung Gomphonema. Frankfurt: Koeltz Scientific Books. Iconographic Diatomologica, no. 8.
54. RIBEIRO, JF. and WALTER, BMT., 1998. Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In SANO, SM. and ALMEIDA, SP. (Eds.). Cerrado: ambiente e flora. Planaltina: Embrapa-CPAC. p. 89-166.
55. RIBEIRO FILHO, RA., PETRERE JUNIOR, M., BENASSI, SF. and PEREIRA, JMA., 2011. Itaipu Reservoir limnology: eutrophication degree and the horizontal distribution of its limnological variables. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol 71, p. 889-902.
56. ROBERTS, ML. and BILBY, RE., 2009. Urbanization alters litterfall rates and nutrient inputs to small Puget Lowland streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, vol. 28, p. 941-954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/07-160.1
57. RODRIGUES, L., LEANDRINE, JA., JATI, S., FONSECA, IA. and SILVA, ELV., 2004. Structure of communities of Periphytic Algae in the Upper Paraná River Floodplain. In AGOSTINHO, AA., RODRIGUES, L., GOMES, LC., THOMAZ, SM. And MIRANDA, LE. (Eds.). Structure and funcioning of the Paraná river and its floodplain. Maringá: Ed. Eduem. p. 43-50.
58. ROS, J., 1979. Práticas de Ecologia. Barcelona: Ed. Omega. 181 p.
59. ROSEMOND, AD., MULHOLLAND, PJ. and ELWOOD, JW., 1993. Top-Down and bottom-up control of stream periphyton: effects of nutrients and herbivores. Ecology, vol. 74, p. 1264-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940495
60. ROUND, FE., 1991. Use of Diatoms for Monitoring Rivers. In WHITTON, BA., ROTT, E. and FRIEDRICH, G. (Eds.). Use of algae for monitoring rivers. Instritute für Botanik: Universität Innsbruck. p. 25-32.
61. ROUND, FE, 1971. The taxonomy of the Chlorophyta, 2. British Phycological Journal, vol. 6, p. 235-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071617100650261
62. SIMONS, J., 1994. Field ecology of freshwater macroalgae in pools and ditches, with special attention to eutrophication. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, vol. 28, p. 25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02334242
63. SIMONSEN, R., 1974. The diatom plankton of the indian ocean expedition of R/V "Meteor". Meteor Forschungsergebnisse Reihe D-Biologie, vol. 19, p. 1-66.
64. Statsoft Inc., 2005. Statistica (data analysis software system). version 7.1. Available from: www.statsoft.com.
65. STEVENSON, RJ., WILEY, MJ., GAGE, SH., LOUGHEED, VL., RISENG, CM., BONNELL, P., BURTON, TM., HOUGH, RA., HYNDMAN, DW., KOCHES, JK., LONG, DT., PIJANOWSKI, BC., QI, J., STEINMAN, AD. and UZARSKI, DG., 2008. Watershed Science: Essential, Complex, Multidisciplinary and Collaborative. In JI, W. (Ed.). Wetland and Water Resource Modeling and Assessment: A Watershed Perspective. CRC Press.
66. TUJI, A., 2000. The effect of irradiance on the growth of different forms of freshwater diatoms: implications for sucession in attached diatom communities. Journal of Phycology, vol. 36, p. 659-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.99212.x
67. TUNDISI, JG., Matsumura-Tundisi, T., ARANTES JUNIOR, JD., TUNDISI, JEM., MANZINI, NF. and DUCROT, R., 2004. The response of Carlos Botelho (Lobo, Broa) reservoir to the passage of cold fronts as reflected by physical, chemical and biological variables. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 64, p. 177-186. PMid:15195377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842004000100020
68. UTERMÖHL H. 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen phytoplancton-methodik. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, vol. 9, p. 1-38.
69. WETZEL, RG. and LIKENS, GE., 1991. Limnological analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
70. WU, N., TANG, T., ZHOU, S., JIA, X., LI, D., LIU, R. and CAI, Q., 2009. Changes in benthic communities following construction of run-of-river dam. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, vol. 28, p. 69-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/08-047.1
71. WUNSAM, S., CATTANEO, A. and BOURASSA, N., 2002. Comparing diatom species, genera and size in biomonitoring: a case study from streams in the Laurentians (Quebec, Canada). Freshwater Biology, vol. 47, p. 325-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00809.x
72. ZHENG, L. and STEVENSON, RJ., 2006. Algal assemblages in multiple habitats of restored and extant wetlands. Hydrobiologia, vol. 561, p. 221-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1616-0