A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Winner of the 2012 HAP Paul award

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1224-1230

  Liu, Fei ^a   Gross, Thomas P ^a  

^a Midlands Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetabular inclination angle; Adverse wear; Hip arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing; Metal ion; Pseudotumor

Indexed keywords

METAL ION;

ACETABULOPLASTY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGIST SCORE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; EXPLANATORY VARIABLE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR SHAFT; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP INJURY; HIP JOINT IMPLANT; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; METAL ON METAL JOINT PROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERTHES DISEASE; RANGE OF MOTION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SLIPPED CAPITAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSIS; SURGICAL INFECTION;

ACETABULAR INCLINATION ANGLE; ADVERSE WEAR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RESURFACING; METAL ION; PSEUDOTUMOR;

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CHROMIUM; COBALT; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880700144     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.033     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hart A.J., Ilo K., Underwood R., et al. The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective. CT-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93(3):315.
2. Langton D.J., Joyce T.J., Jameson S.S., et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93(2):164.
3. Glyn-Jones S., Pandit H., Kwon Y.M., et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(12):1566.
4. De Haan R., Pattyn C., Gill H.S., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(10):1291.
5. De Smet K., De Haan R., Calistri A., et al. Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 4):202.
6. Campbell P., Ebramzadeh E., Nelson S., et al. Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(9):2321.
7. Malviya A., Holland J.P. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Acta Orthop Belg 2009, 75(4):477.
8. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl 2):118. Group tCHRS.
9. Gross T.P., Liu F., Webb L.A. Clinical Outcome of the Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Corin Cormet 2000 Hip Resurfacing System An up to 11-Year Follow-Up Study. J Arthroplasty 2011.
10. Gross T.P., Liu F. Incidence of Adverse Wear Reactions in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Comparison with the Oxford Study 2012, AAOS, San Francisco.
11. Heisel C., Streich N., Krachler M., et al. Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):125.
12. Gross T.P., Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):32.
13. Gross T.P., Liu F. Comparison of fully porous-coated and hybrid hip resurfacing: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42(2):231.
14. agency MaHpr. Medical Device Alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/008) In. 2012.
15. Lombardi A.V., Barrack R.L., Berend K.R., et al. Hip Society: Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Metal-on-Metal Arthroplasty 2012, AAOS, San Francisco.
16. Gross T.P., Liu F. Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index. J Orthop Surg Res 2012, 7(1):1.
17. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):36.
18. Mont M.A., Schmalzried T.P. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):3.
19. AAOS. Modern Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing A Technology Overview. In. Dec 2011.
20. Gross T.P., Liu F., Webb L. Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(6):1554.
21. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60(2):217.
22. Kalteis T., Handel M., Bathis H., et al. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88(2):163.
23. Kalteis T., Handel M., Herold T., et al. Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system. Int Orthop 2005, 29(5):272.
24. Langton D.J., Sprowson A.P., Mahadeva D., et al. Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(4):607.
25. Hart A.J., Skinner J.A., Henckel J., et al. Insufficient Acetabular Version Increases Blood Metal Ion Levels after Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(9):2590.
26. Gross T.P., Liu F. Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2012, 36(1):27.
27. Gross T.P., Lu F. Hip resurfacing with the biomet hybrid recap/magnum system: seven-year results. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(9):1683.
28. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., et al. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1143.
29. Smolders J.M., Bisseling P., Hol A., et al. Metal ion interpretation in resurfacing versus conventional hip arthroplasty and in whole blood versus serum. How should we interpret metal ion data. Hip Int 2011, 21(5):587.