Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: A comparison with fractional flow reserve

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 389-395

  Choo, Ki Seok ^a   Hwangbo, Lee ^a   Kim, June Hong ^a   Park, Yong Hyun ^a   Kim, Jeong Su ^a   Kem, Jun ^a   Chun, Kook Jin ^a   Jeong, Dong Wook ^a   Lim, Soo Jin ^b  

^a Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Kim Hae Jungang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; DISEASES;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVES; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING (MPI); POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC USE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84880652402     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113475440     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135-44
2. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;248:466-75
3. Lim SJ, Choo KS, Park YH, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function and volume in patients undergoing 128-slice coronary CT angiography with ECG-based maximum tube current modulation: a comparison with echocardiography. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:156-62
4. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636-43
5. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;3:174-82
6. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254:410-9
7. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1072-84
8. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Borges AC, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:310-5
9. Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:905-16
10. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-8
11. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260:689-98
12. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:881-9
13. Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:48-55
14. Sato A, Hiroe M, Tamura M, et al. Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2008;49:564-72
15. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 2008;248:414-23
16. Santana CA, Garcia EV, Faber TL, et al. Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:201-11
17. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:153-60
18. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2008;69:550-7
19. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1510-7
20. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2414-24
21. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart-principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:423-33
22. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:318-32
23. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2011;21:26-35
24. Kim JE, Koo BK. Fractional flow reserve: the past, present and future. Korean Circ J 2012;42:441-6
25. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012;33:67-77
26. Krittayaphong R, Boonyasirinant T, Saiviroonporn P, et al. Myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: do we need rest images? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:139-48
27. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:540-9
28. Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Schenzle JC, et al. Systolic acquisition of coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography: feasibility in an unselected patient population. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1331-6