Experimental investigation of the penetration of ultrasound nanobubbles in a gastric cancer xenograft

Nanotechnology

Volumn 24, Issue 32, 2013, Pages

  Fan, Xiaozhou ^a   Wang, Luofu ^b   Guo, Yanli ^a   Tong, Haipeng ^a   Li, Lang ^a   Ding, Jun ^a   Huang, Haiyun ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST IMAGING; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; GASTRIC CANCERS; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSTICS; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT; ULTRASOUND IMAGING; VASCULAR SYSTEM;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BLOOD VESSELS; DISEASES; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONICS;

TUMORS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; LIPID; NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG SCREENING; ECHOGRAPHY; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; MICROBUBBLE; MOUSE; NUDE MOUSE; PARTICLE SIZE; PATHOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STOMACH TUMOR; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE; ARTICLE;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; LIPIDS; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICROBUBBLES; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONICS; XENOGRAFT MODEL ANTITUMOR ASSAYS;

EID: 84880646109     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/32/325102     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Moestue S A, Gribbestad I S and Hansen R 2012 Intravascular targets for molecular contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13 6679-97
2. Schmitz G 2008 Ultrasonic imaging of molecular targets Basic Res. Cardiol. 103 174-81
3. Hong H et al 2012 In vivo targeting and imaging of tumor vasculature with radiolabeled, antibody-conjugated nanographene ACS Nano. 6 2361-70
4. Kaufmann B A, Sanders J M, Davis C, Xie A, Aldred P, Sarembock I J and Lindner J R 2007 Molecular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis with targeted ultrasound detection of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 Circulation 116 276-84
5. Weller G E, Wong M K, Modzelewski R A, Lu E, Klibanov A L, Wagner W R and Villanueva F S 2005 Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine Cancer Res. 65 533-9
6. Mizushige K, Kondo I, Ohmori K, Hirao K and Matsuo H 1999 Enhancement of ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis by echo contrast agents: dependence on microbubble structure Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1925 1431-7
7. Ricci S, Dinia L, Del Sette M, Anzola P, Mazzoli T, Cenciarelli S and Gandolfo C 2012 Sonothrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6 CD008348
8. Hobbs S K, Monsky W L, Yuan F, Roberts W G, Griffith L, Torchilin V P and Jain R K 1998 Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 4607-12
9. Maeda H, Bharate G Y and Daruwalla J 2009 Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 71 409-19
10. Campbell R B 2006 Tumor physiology and delivery of nanopharmaceuticals Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 6 503-12
11. Iyer A K, Khaled G, Fang J and Maeda H 2006 Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting Drug Discov. Today 11 812-8
12. Cho K J, Wang X, Nie S M, Chen Z and Shin D M 2008 Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 14 1310-6
13. Xing Z, Wang J, Ke H, Zhao B, Yue X, Dai Z and Liu J 2010 The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging Nanotechnology 21 145607
14. Deshpande N, Needles A and Willmann J K 2010 Molecular ultrasound imaging: current status and future directions Clin. Radiol. 65 567-81
15. Ferrara K W, Borden M A and Zhang H 2009 Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery Acc. Chem. Res. 42 881-92
16. Cavalli R, Bisazza A, Trotta M, Argenziano M, Civra A, Donalisio M and Lembo D 2012 New chitosan nanobubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization Int. J. Nanomedicine 7 3309-18
17. Wang Y, Li X, Zhou Y, Huang P Y and Xu Y H 2010 Preparation of nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging and intracelluar drug delivery Int. J. Pharm. 384 148-53
18. Peng S et al 2012 Clinical utility of a microbubble-enhancing contrast ('SonoVue') in treatment of uterine fibroids with high intensity focused ultrasound: a retrospective study Eur. J. Radiol. 81 3832-8
19. Wang D, Li L, Min J, Guo Y, Guo H, Gao J, Yang K and Zou J 2012 Combination of high-intensity focused ultrasound with nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent in treatment of rabbit breast VX2 tumors: a pilot study Clin. Imaging 36 717-23
20. Krupka T M, Solorio L, Wilson R E, Wu H, Azar N and Exner A A 2010 Formulation and characterization of echogenic lipid-Pluronic nanobubbles Mol. Pharm. 7 49-59
21. Liu P, Wang X, Zhou S, Hua X, Liu Z and Gao Y 2011 Effects of a novel ultrasound contrast agent with long persistence on right ventricular pressure: comparison with SonoVue Ultrasonics 51 210-4
22. Liu H, Wang X, Tan K B, Liu P, Zhuo Z X, Liu Z, Hua X, Zhuo Q Q, Xia H M and Gao Y H 2011 Molecular imaging of vulnerable plaques in rabbits using contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeting to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 J. Clin. Ultrasound 39 83-90
23. Oeffinger B E and Wheatley M A 2004 Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent Ultrasonics 42 343-7
24. Correas J M, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Mejean A, Claudon M and Helenon O 2001 Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts Eur. Radiol. 11 1316-28
25. Johnson-Neitman J L, O'Brien R T and Wallace J D 2012 Quantitative perfusion analysis of the pancreas and duodenum in healthy dogs by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography Am. J. Vet. Res. 73 385-92
26. Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau M B, Brochot J, Broillet A, Ventrone R and Yan F 1995 BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles Invest. Radiol. 30 451-7
27. Yin T, Wang P, Zheng R, Zheng B, Cheng D, Zhang X and Shuai X 2012 Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors Int. J. Nanomedicine 7 895-904
28. Liu L, Zheng H, Williams L, Zhang F, Wang R, Hertzberg J and Shandas R 2008 Development of a custom-designed echo particle image velocimetry system for multi-component hemodynamic measurements: system characterization and initial experimental results Phys. Med. Biol. 53 1397-412
29. Lindner J R, Song J, Jayaweera A R, Sklenar J and Kaul S 2002 Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 15 396-403
30. Geis N A, Katus H A and Bekeredjian R 2012 Microbubbles as a vehicle for gene and drug delivery: current clinical implications and future perspectives Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 18 2166-83
31. Niu C, Wang Z, Zuo G, Krupka T M, Ran H, Zhang P, Li P, Chen Y, Chen H and Zheng Y 2012 Poly(Lactide-co-glycolide) ultrasonographic microbubbles carrying Sudan black for preoperative and intraoperative localization of lymph nodes Clin. Breast Cancer 12 199-206
32. Rapoport N Y, Nam K H, Gao Z and Kennedy A 2009 Application of ultrasound for targeted nanotherapy of malignant tumors Acoust. Phys. 55 594-601
33. De Jong N, Emmer M, Van Wamel A and Versluis M 2009 Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 47 861-73
34. Zheng H, Kruse D E, Stephens D N, Ferrara K W, Sutcliffe P and Gardner E 2008 A sensitive ultrasonic imaging method for targeted contrast microbubble detection Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008 5290-3
35. Marxer E E, Brussler J, Becker A, Schummelfeder J, Schubert R, Nimsky C and Bakowsky U 2011 Development and characterization of new nanoscaled ultrasound active lipid dispersions as contrast agents Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 77 430-7
36. Gao Z, Kennedy A M, Christensen D A and Rapoport N Y 2008 Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy Ultrasonics 48 260-70
37. Li H et al 2011 Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor blockade reduces tumor angiogenesis and enhances the effects of bevacizumab for a human gastric cancer cell line, MKN45 Cancer 117 3135-47
38. Maeda H 2012 Vascular permeability in cancer and infection as related to macromolecular drug delivery, with emphasis on the EPR effect for tumor-selective drug targeting Proc. Japan. Acad. B 88 53-71
39. Gao Z G, Lee D H, Kim D I and Bae Y H 2005 Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive micelle targeting acidic extracellular pH of human ovarian A2780 tumor in mice J. Drug Target 13 391-7
40. Ferrante E A, Pickard J E, Rychak J, Klibanov A and Ley K 2009 Dual targeting improves microbubble contrast agent adhesion to VCAM-1 and P-selectin under flow J. Control Release. 140 100-7
41. Warram J M, Sorace A G, Saini R, Umphrey H R, Zinn K R and Hoyt K 2011 A triple-targeted ultrasound contrast agent provides improved localization to tumor vasculature J. Ultrasound Med. 30 921-31
42. Du Toit L C, Govender T, Pillay V, Choonara Y E and Kodama T 2011 Investigating the effect of polymeric approaches on circulation time and physical properties of nanobubbles Pharm. Res. 28 494-504
43. Xu J S, Huang J, Qin R, Hinkle G H, Povoski S P, Martin E W and Xu R X 2010 Synthesizing and binding dual-mode poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanobubbles for cancer targeting and imaging Biomaterials 31 1716-22
44. Ferrara K, Pollard R and Borden M 2007 Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 415-47
45. Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Utoguchi N and Maruyama K 2008 Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technology Int. J. Pharm. 354 49-55