Appetitive long-term taste conditioning enhances human visually evoked EEG responses

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 253, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-8

  Viemose, Ida ^a   Møller, Per ^a   Laugesen, Jakob L ^a   Schachtman, Todd R ^b   Manoharan, Thukirtha ^c   Christoffersen, Gert R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Conditioning; EEG; Taste; Visual evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELTA RHYTHM; DENMARK; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THETA RHYTHM; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUOGUSTATORY CONDITIONING; VOLUNTEER;

CONDITIONING; EEG; TASTE; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL;

ADULT; APPETITE; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DELTA RHYTHM; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TASTE; THETA RHYTHM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880623692     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.033     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Delatour B., Gisquet-Verrier P. Functional role of rat prelimbic-infralimbic cortices in spatial memory; evidence for their involvement in attention and behavioural flexibility. Behav Brain Res 2000, 109:113-1128.
2. Laroche S., Davis S., Jay T.M. Plasticity at hippocampal to prefrontal cortex synapses: dual roles in working memory and consolidation. Hippocampus 2000, 10:438-446.
3. Martin S.J., Morris R.G.M. New life in an old idea: the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited. Hippocampus 2002, 12:609-636.
4. Naie K., Manahan-Vaughan D. Regulation by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 of LTP in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats: relevance for learning and memory formation. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14:189-198.
5. Hermann C., Ziegler S., Birbaumer N., Flor H. Pavlovian aversive and appetitive odor conditioning in humans: subjective, peripheral and electrocortical changes. Exp Brain Res 2000, 132:203-215.
6. Flor H., Birbaumer N., Roberts L., Roberts L.E., Feige B., Lutzenberger W., et al. Slow potentials, event-related potentials, gamma band activity and motor responses during aversive conditioning in humans. Exp Brain Res 1996, 112:298-312.
7. Skrandies W., Jedynak A. Associative learning in humans - conditioning of sensory-evoked brain activity. Behav Brain Res 2000, 107:1-8.
8. Begleiter H., Platz A. Evoked potentials: modifications by classical conditioning. Science 1969, 166:503-516.
9. Montoya P., Larbig W., Pulvermüller F., Flor H., Birbaumer N. Cortical correlates of semantic classical conditioning. Psychophysiology 1996, 33:644-649.
10. Bruneau N., Dubost P., Jussaume P., Laffont F., Lelord G. Personality traits and electrophysiological factors during sensory conditioning in normal and psychiatric populations. Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research 1978, 364-368. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. D.A. Otto (Ed.).
11. Heim S., Keil A. Effects of classical conditioning on identification and cortical processing of speech syllables. Exp Brain Res 2006, 175:411-424.
12. Hugdahl K., Nordby H. Hemisphere differences in conditional learning: an ERP study. Cortex 1991, 27:557-570.
13. Roger M., Galand G. Operant conditioning of visual evoked potentials in man. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:477-482.
14. Cox S.M.L., Andrade A., Johnsrude I.S. Learning to like: s role for human orbitofrontal cortex in conditioned reward. J Neurosci 2005, 25:2733-2740.
15. De Houwer S., Thomas S., Baeyens F. Association learning of likes and dislikes: s review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychol Bull 2001, 127:853-869.
16. O'Doherty J., Buchanan T.W., Seymour B., Dolan R.J. Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum. Neuron 2006, 49:157-166.
17. Franken I.H.A., Huijding J., Nijs I.M.T., van Strien J.W. Electrophysiology of appetitive taste and appetitive taste conditioning in humans. Biol Psychol 2011, 86:273-278.
18. Escobar M.L., Alcocer I., Chan V. The NMDA receptor antagonist CPP impairs conditioned taste aversion and insular cortex long-term potentiation in vivo. Brain Res 1998, 812:246-251.
19. Jones M.W., French P., Bliss T.V., Rosenblum K. Molecular mechanisms of long-term potentiation in the insular cortex in vivo. J Neurosci 1999, 19:RC36.
20. Barki-Harrington L., Belelovsky K., Doron H., Rosenblum K. Molecular mechanisms of taste learning in the insular cortex and amygdala. Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes 2009, 341-363. Oxford University Press, New York. S. Reilly, T. Schachtman (Eds.).
21. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating. Behav Brain Sci 1988, 11:357-428.
22. Rockstroh B., Elbert T., Canavan A., Lutzenberger W., Birbaumer N. Slow cortical potentials and behaviour 1989, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore.
23. Coles M.G.H., Rugg M.D. Event related brain potentials: an introduction. Electrophysiology of mind 1996, 1-26. Oxford University Press. M.D. Rugg, M.G.H. Coles (Eds.).
24. Pause B.M., Krauel K. Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) as a key to the psychology of odors. Int J Psychophysiol 2000, 36:105-122.
25. Chatrian G-E., Lettich E., Nelson P.L. Ten percent electrode system for topographic studies of spontaneous and evoked EEG activity. Am J EEG Technol 1985, 25:83-92.
26. Chatrian G-E., Lettich E., Nelson P.L. Modified nomenclature for the '10%' electrode system. J Clin Neurophysiol 1988, 5:183-186.
27. American Electroencephalograpic Society American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991, 8(2):200-202.
28. American Electroencephalograpic Society Guideline thirteen: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 11:111-113.
29. Klem G.H., Lüders H.O., Jasper H.H., Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999, Suppl. 52:3-6.
30. Oostenveld R., Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:713-719.
31. Babiloni C., Binetti G., Cassetta E., Del Forno G., Del Percio C., Ferreri F., et al. Sources of cortical rhythms change as a function of cognitive impairment in pathological aging: a multicenter study. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:252-268.
32. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994, 18:49-65.
33. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Esslen M., Kochi K., Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): review, new comparisons and new validation. Jpn J Clin Neurophys 2002, 30:81-94.
34. Vitacco D., Brandeis D., Pascual-Marqui R., Martin E. Correspondence of event-related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17:4-12.
35. Palmero-Soler E., Dolan K., Hadamschek V., Tass P.A. swLORETA: a novel approach to robust source localization and synchronization tomography. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52:1783-1800.
36. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:262-270.
37. Ishai A., Pessoa L., Bikle P.C., Ungeleider L.G. Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. PNAS 2004, 101:9827-9832.
38. Gonsalves B.D., Kahn I., Curran T., Norman K.A., Wagner A.D. Memory strength and repetition suppression: multimodal imaging of medial temporal cortical contributions to recognition. Neuron 2005, 47:751-761.
39. Summerfield C., Trittschuh E.H., Monti J.M., Mesulam M-M., Egner T. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11:1004-1006.
40. Sutton S., Baren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked potentials correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
41. Sutton S., Tucting P., Zubin J., John E.R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science 1967, 155:1436-1439.
42. Schachtman T.R., Walker J., Fowler S. Conditioning and advertising. Conditioning and animal learning: human and non-human applications 2011, Oxford University Press, New York. T.R. Schachtman, S. Reilly (Eds.).
43. Braun C., Lutzenberger W., Miltner W., Elbert T. Can subcortical structures generate potentials large in amplitude?. Psychophysiological brain research 1990, 31-35. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg. C. Brunia, A. Gaillard, A. Kok (Eds.).
44. Ohla K., Toepel U., le Coutre J., Hudry J. Visual-gustatory interaction: orbitofrontal and insular cortices mediate the effect of high-calorie visual food cues on taste pleasantness. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(3):e32434.
45. Martin S.J., Grimwood P.D., Morris R.G.M. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Ann Rev Neurosci 2000, 23:649-711.
46. Simonyi A., Schachtman T.R., Christoffersen G.R.J. The role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in learning and memory processes. Drug News Perspect 2005, 18:353-361.
47. Simonyi A., Schachtman T.R., Christoffersen G.R.J. Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 in learning and memory. Eur J Pharmacol 2010, 639:17-25.
48. Hallet M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 2000, 406:147-150.
49. Hoogendam J.M., Ramakers G.M.J., Di Lazzaro V. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimulation 2010, 3:95-118.
50. Bolshakov V.Y., Golan H., Kandel E., Siegelbaum S.A. Recruitment of new sites of synaptic transmission during the cAMP-dependent late phase of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus. Neuron 1997, 19:635-651.
51. May A. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the adult human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2011, 15:475-482.
52. Dragansky B., May A. Training-induced structural changes in the adult human brain. Behav Brain Res 2012, 192:137-142.
53. Huang Y-Y., Kandel E.R. Postsynaptic induction and PKA-dependent expression of LTP in the lateral amygdala. Neuron 1998, 21:169-178.
54. Manahan-Vaughan D., Ngomba R.T., Storto M., Kulla A., Catania M.V., Chiecio S., et al. An increased expression of the mGlu5 receptor protein following LTP induction at the perforant path-dentate gyrus synapse in freely moving rats. Neuropharmacology 2003, 44:17-25.
55. O'Connor J.J., Rowan M.J., Anwyl R. Tetanically induced LTP involves a similar increase in the AMPA and NMDA receptor components of the excitatory synaptic components: investigations of the involvement of mGlu receptors. J Neurosci 1995, 15:2013-2020.
56. Harney S.C., Jane D.E., Anwyl R. Extrasynaptic NR2D-containing NMDARs are recruited to the synapses during LTP of NMDAR-EPSCs. J Neurosci 2008, 28:11685-11694.
57. Rebola N., Srikumar B.N., Mulle C. Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity of NMDA receptors. J Physiol 2010, 588:93-99.