Interpreting elementary science teacher responsiveness through epistemological framing

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 293-300

  Maskiewicz, April Cordero ^a   Winters, Victoria ^b  

^a POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DUAL USE; ELEMENTARY SCIENCE; SCIENCE CLASSROOM; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY;

TEACHING;

EID: 84880544306     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 665-701.
3. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M, Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A. & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
4. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
5. Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In R. Lesh & A. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research methodologies for science and mathematics education (pp. 341-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cohen, S. (2004). Teachers' Professional Development and the Elementary Mathematics Classroom: Bringing Understandings to Light. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
7. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 105-225.
8. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A. & Shouse, A. w., (Eds). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
9. Empson, S. B. & Jacobs, V. R. (2008). Learning to listen to children's mathematics. In D. Tirosh and T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 257-281). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
10. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L. & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689.
11. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
12. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Northeastern University Press.
13. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. & Redish, E. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-119). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
14. Hammer, D., Russ, R., Mikeska, J. & Scherr, R. E. (2008). Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing students' abilities. In R. A. Duschl and R. E. Grandy (Eds.). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 138-156). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
15. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 916-929.
16. Levin, D. M. (2008). What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.
17. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D. & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68.
18. McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationale and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
19. Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93-127.
20. National Research Council (1996). National science education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
21. Pierson, J. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
22. Russ, R., Scherr, R., Hammer, D. & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499-525.
23. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B. & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
24. Sherin, M. G. & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal Of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
25. Sikorski, T., Winters, V., and Hammer, D. (2009, June). Defining learning progressions for scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA.
26. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Thompson, J., Braaten, M. & Windschitl, M. (2009, June). Learning progressions as vision tools for advancing teachers' pedagogical performance. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA.
28. Tytler, R. & Peterson, S. (2004). From try it and see to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children's scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 94-118.
29. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry": How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.