Cross-Level Effects of Team Task Interdependence on the Relationship Between Learning Goal Orientation and Feedback-Seeking Behaviors

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 230-241

  Cho, Jaehee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback Seeking Behaviors; Hierarchical Linear Modeling; Leaning Goal Orientation; Team Task Interdependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880351834     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2013.806258     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, B. C., Sargent, L. D., & Bradley, L. M. (2003). Differential effects of task and reward interdependence on perceived helping behavior, effort, and group performance. Small Group Research, 34, 716-740.
2. Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2007). The relationship between uncertainty and desire for feedback: A test of competing hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1007-1040.
3. Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
4. Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-214.
5. Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773-799.
6. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370-398.
7. Callister, R. R., Kramer, M. W., & Turban, D. B. (1999). Feedback seeking following career transitions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 429-438.
8. Choi, J. (2008). Even justice perceptions and employees' reactions: Perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 513-528.
9. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
10. Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 767-794.
11. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra, A. (1999). Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 205-222.
12. Hoffman, B. J., Bynum, B. H., Piccolo, R. F., & Sutton, A. W. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academic of Management Journal, 54, 779-796.
13. Hollingshead, A. B., Costa, G. H., & Beck, S. (2007). Motives and goals in context: A strategic analysis of information sharing in groups. In K. Fiedler (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 257-280). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
15. Huang, M., Barbour, J., Su, C., & Contractor, N. (2010, June). Group practices that support the use of digital knowledge repositories: A multilevel analysis of information provision. Paper presented at the 60th annual meeting for the International Communication Association, Suntec City, Singapore.
16. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
17. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 129-154.
18. Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Los Angeles, CA: California State University.
19. Lee, H. S., & Lim, J. H. (2007). Structural equation modeling analysis and AMOS 6.0. Seoul, Korea: Bubmunsa Corporation.
20. Levy, P. E., Albright, M. D., Cawley, B. D., & Williams, J. R. (1995). Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62 (1), 23-37.
21. Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 723-746.
22. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. J. (2004). The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46, 427-440.
23. Moates, K., N., Harris, S. G., Field, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. (2007). Perspective taking and leader-member exchange in supervisor/subordinate dyads: A hierarchical linear modeling investigation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
24. Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
25. Morrison, E. W., Chen, Y., & Salgado, S. R. (2004). Cultural differences in newcomer feedback seeking: A comparison of the United States and Hong Kong. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53 (1), 1-22.
26. Park, G., Schmidt, A. M., Scheu, C., & DeShon, R. P. (2007). A process model of goal orientation and feedback seeking. Human Performance, 20, 119-145.
27. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A metaanalytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150.
28. Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838-844.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (advanced quantitative techniques in the social science). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Renn, R. W., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27, 563-583.
31. Schonfeld, I. S., & Rindskopf, D. (2007). Hierarchical linear modeling in organizational research: Longitudinal data outside the context of growth modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 417-429.
32. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
33. Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 195-216.
34. Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613-624.
35. Vancouver, J. B., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Feedback inquiry: The effect of source attributes and individual differences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 276-285.
36. van der Vegt, G., Emans, B., & van de Vliert, E. (1999). Effects of interdependencies in project teams. Journal of Sociological Psychology, 139, 202-214.
37. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
38. VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 581-604.
39. VandeWalle, D., Ganesan, S., Challagalla, G. N., & Brown, S. P. (2000). An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 996-1003.
40. Wageman, R., & Gordon, F. M. (2005). As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organization Science, 16, 687-700.