Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: Per lesion analysis

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2087-2094

  Gennaro, Gisella ^a   Hendrick, R Edward ^b   Toledano, Alicia ^c   Paquelet, Jean R ^d,e   Bezzon, Elisabetta ^a   Chersevani, Roberta ^f   Di Maggio, Cosimo ^g   La Grassa, Manuela ^h   Pescarini, Luigi ^a   Polico, Ilaria ^a   Proietti, Alessandro ^a   Baldan, Enrica ^a   Pomerri, Fabio ^a   Muzzio, Pier Carlo ^a  

^a VENETO INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY IOV IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Biostatistics Consulting   (United States)

^d Advanced Medical Imaging Consultants   (United States)

^e McKee Medical Center ^*  (United States)

^f Private Clinical Practice   (Italy)

^g Private Clinical Practice   (Italy)

^h CENTRO DI RIFERIMENTO ONCOLOGICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast tomosynthesis; Clinical performance; Mammography; Per lesion analysis; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; READING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84880331496     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2831-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293:1245-1256
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group: diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
3. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168-175
4. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE (2004) Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29-41
5. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancer missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613-617
6. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817-2825
7. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:586-591
8. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA et al (2012) Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010:16-24
9. Gennaro G, Toledano A, di Maggio C et al (2012) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 20:1545-1553
10. Wallis MG, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M (2012) Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high resolution x-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 262:78-796
11. Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjørndal H et al (2012) Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 53:524-529
12. Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK et al (2012) A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol 67:976-981
13. Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D, Zackrisson S, Do Y, Mattsson S, Andersson I (2012) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol 85:e1074-82
14. Gennaro G, Hendrick RE, Ruppel P et al (2012) Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography. Eur Radiol 23:664-72
15. Obuchowski NA (2005) Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists: ROC analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:364-372
16. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29-36
17. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS (2004) Observer studies involving detection and localization: modelling, analysis and validation. Med Phys 31:2313-2330
18. Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE et al (2011) Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:737-741
19. Kopans DB (2007) Breast imaging, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 323-342
20. Wu T, Liu B, Moore R, Kopans D (2006) Optimal acquisition techniques for digital breast tomosynthesis screening. In: Flynn MJ, Hsieh J (eds) Medical imaging 2006: physics of medical imaging. Proc SPIE 6142:61425E
21. Wu T, Moore RH, Rafferty EA, Kopans DB (2004) A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 31:2636-2647
22. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
23. Obuchowski NA (1997) Testing for equivalence of diagnostic tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:13-17
24. Hillis SL (2007) A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med 26:596-619
25. Chen W, Petrick NA, Sahiner B (2012) Hypothesis testing in noninferiority and equivalence MRMC ROC studies. Acad Radiol 19:1158-1165
26. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH et al (2011) Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:320-324
27. Kopans DB, Gavenonis S, Halpern E, Moore R (2011) Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J 17:638-664
28. Gur D, Bandos AI, Cohen CS et al (2008) The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. Radiology 249:47-53