CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-Volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) : A new technique for fast time-resolved dynamic 3-dimensional imaging of the abdomen with high spatial resolution

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 590-597

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a   Morelli, John N ^b   Budjan, Johannes ^a   Riffel, Philipp ^a   Nickel, Dominik ^c   Kroeker, Randall ^d   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Attenberger, Ulrike I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d Siemens Healthcare Sector   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CAIPIRINHA DIXON TWIST VOLUME INTERPOLATED BREATH HOLD EXAMINATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 84880315434     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318289a70b     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM, et al. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: Feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology. 2000;215:365-372.
2. Willatt JM, Hussain HK, Adusumilli S, et al. MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: Challenges and controversies. Radiology. 2008; 247:311-330.
3. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:591-603.
4. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Nittka M, et al. Partially parallel imaging with localized sensitivities (PILS). Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:602-609.
5. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202-1210.
6. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952-962.
7. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Kramer H, et al. High-resolution renal MRA: Comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:95-100.
8. Michaely HJ, Kramer H, Dietrich O, et al. Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Initial experience. Radiology. 2007;244:907-913.
9. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Mueller MF, et al. Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA). Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:549-556.
10. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Heidemann RM, et al. Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi-slice imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:684-691.
11. Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, et al. Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:63-69.
12. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345-351.
13. Attenberger UI, Haneder S, Morelli JN, et al. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 2010;257:879-887.
14. Nael K, Krishnam M, Ruehm SG, et al. Time-resolved MR angiography in the evaluation of central thoracic venous occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1731-1738.
15. Giesel FL, Runge V, Kirchin M, et al. Three-dimensional multiphase timeresolved low-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using TWIST on a 32-channel coil at 3 T: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of a conventional gadolinium chelate with a high-relaxivity agent. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:678-683.
16. DixonWT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1984;153:189-194.
17. Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Dietrich O, et al. Feasibility of gadofosvesetenhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels at 3 tesla with Dixon fat saturation. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:635-641.
18. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:375-385.
19. Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Huber A, et al. High-resolution MR-imaging of the liver with T2-weighted sequences using integrated parallel imaging: Comparison of prospective motion correction and respiratory triggering. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:443-450.
20. Herborn C, Watkins D, Runge V, et al. Renal arteries: Comparison of steadystate free precession MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2006;239:263-268.
21. Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci NC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: How I do it. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:632-637.
22. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Yi T, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: Prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver. Radiology. 1996; 200:79-84.
23. Yu JS, Kim KW, Kim EK, et al. Contrast enhancement of small hepatocellular carcinoma: Usefulness of three successive early image acquisitions during multiphase dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:597-604.
24. Zech CJ, Vos B, Nordell A, et al. Vascular enhancement in early dynamic liver MR imaging in an animal model: Comparison of two injection regimen and two different doses Gd-EOB-DTPA (gadoxetic acid) with standard Gd-DTPA. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:305-310.
25. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, et al. Fluoroscopically triggered contrastenhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: Application to the renal arteries. Radiology. 1997;205:137-146.
26. Ma J, Vu AT, Son JB, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 23:36-41.
27. Le Y, Kroeker R, Kipfer HD, et al. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:483-491.
28. Saranathan M, Rettmann DW, Hargreaves BA, et al. Differential subsampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO): A high spatio-temporal resolution Dixon imaging sequence for multiphasic contrast enhanced abdominal imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:1484-1492.
29. Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, et al. Free-breathing radial 3D fatsuppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: A viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:648-653.
30. Chan R, Kumar G, Abdullah B, et al. Optimising the scan delay for arterial phase imaging of the liver using the bolus tracking technique. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011;7:e12.
31. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Nino-Murcia M, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: Value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (G or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:879-884.
32. Schima W, Hammerstingl R, Catalano C, et al. Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: Effect of contrast material flow rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1571-1579.