Understanding spatial filtering for analysis of land use-transport data

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 123-131

  Wang, Yiyi ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b   Wang, Xiaokun ^c  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use change; Land valuation; Spatial autoregressive regression; Spatial filtering; Spatial probit

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EID: 84880291194     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
2. Anselin L., Hudak S. Spatial econometrics in practice: A review of software options. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22(3):509-536.
3. Bivand, R., 2011. spdep: Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models. <> (accessed 06.06.11). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/index.html.
4. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York. Second ed.
5. Chakir R., Parent O. Determinants of land use changes: a spatial multinomial probit approach. Papers in Regional Science 2009, 88(2):327-344.
6. Chun Y. Modeling network autocorrelation within migration flows by eigenvector spatial filtering. Journal of Geographical Systems 2008, 10(4):317-344.
7. Chun Y., Griffith D.A. Modeling network autocorrelation in space-time migration flow data: an eigenvector spatial filtering approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2011, 101(3):523-536.
8. Cressie N. Statistics for Spatial Data 1991, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
9. De Jong P., Sprenger C., van Veen F. On extreme values of Moran's I and Geary's c. Geographic Analysis 1984, 16(1):17-24.
10. Diniz-Filho J.A., Bini L.M. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2005, 14(2):177-185.
11. Dray S., Legendre P., Peres-Neto P.R. Spatial modeling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbor matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modeling 2006, 196(3):483-493.
12. Fotheringham S. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships 2003, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
13. Getis A. Screening for spatial dependence in regression analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1990, 69(1):69-81.
14. Getis A. Spatial filtering in a regression framework: experiments on regional inequality, government expenditures, and urban crime. Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis 1995, 191-202. Springer, Berlin. L. Anselin, S.J. Rey (Eds.).
15. Getis A., Griffith D. Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geographical Analysis 2002, 34(2):130-140.
16. Griffith D.A. Spatial autocorrelation and eigenfunctions of the geographic weights matrix accompanying geo-referenced data. The Canadian Geographer 1996, 4(4):351-367.
17. Griffith D.A. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem. Journal of Geographical Systems 2000, 2(2):141-156.
18. Griffith D.A. A spatial filtering specification for the auto-logistic model. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36:1791-1811.
19. Griffith D.A. Spatial-filtering-based contributions to a critique of geographically weighted regression (GWR). Environment and Planning A 2007, 40:2751-2769.
20. Griffith D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analysis. Ecology 2006, 87(10):2603-2613.
21. Ibéas Á., Cordera R., dell'OlioL L., Coppola P., Domínquez A. Modeling transport and real-estate values interactions in urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography 2012, 24:370-382.
22. Jacob B.G., Griffith D.A., Novak R.J. Decomposing malaria mosquito aquatic habitat data into spatial autocorrelation eigenvectors in a SAS/GIS® module. Transactions in GIS 2008, 12(3):341-364.
23. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis 2002, Springer, New York.
24. LeSage J., Pace K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics 2009, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
25. McMillen D.P. Employment densities, spatial autocorrelation, and subcenters in large metropolitan areas. Journal of Regional Science 2004, 44(2):225-243.
26. Moniruzzaman M., Páez A. Accessibility to transit, by transit, and mode share: application of a logistic model with spatial filters. Journal of Transport Geography 2012, 24:198-205.
27. Munroe D.K., Southworth J., Tucker C.M. The dynamics of land-cover change in western honduras: exploring spatial and temporal complexity. Agricultural Economics 2002, 27(3):355-369.
28. Niemeier D.A. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 1997, 24(4):377-396.
29. Páez A. Exploring contextual variations in land use and transport analysis using a probit model with geographical weights. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(3):167-176.
30. Patuelli R., Griffith D.A., Tiefelsdorf M., Nijkamp P. Spatial filtering and eigenvector stability: space-time models for german unemployment data. International Regional Science Review 2011, 34(2):253-280.
31. Sakomoto Y., Ishiguro M., Kitagawa G. Akaike Information Criterion Statistics 1986, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Germany.
32. TCAD (Travis County Appraisal District), 2008. Tax Information. <>. http://www.traviscad.org.
33. Tiefelsdorf M., Boots B. The exact distribution of Moran's I. Environment and Planning A 1995, 27(6):985-999.
34. Tiefelsdorf M., Griffith D.A. Semiparametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: the eigenvector approach. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(5):1193-1221.
35. Wang X., Kockelman K. Bayesian inference for ordered response data with a dynamic spatial-ordered probit model. Journal of Regional Science 2009, 49(5):877-913.
36. Wang X., Kockelman K. Application of the dynamic spatial ordered probit model: patterns of land development change in Austin, Texas. Regional Science 2009, 88(2):345-366.
37. Wang X., Kockelman K. Application of the dynamic spatial ordered probit model: patterns of ozone concentration in Austin, Texas. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2132:13-24.
38. Wang X., Kockelman K.M., Lemp J.D. The dynamic spatial multinomial probit model: analysis of land use change using parcel-level data. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 24:77-88.
39. Wang Y., Kockelman K.M., Wang X. The impact of weight matrices on parameter estimation and inference: a case study of binary response using land use data. Journal of Transportation and Land Use 2013, 6(3). forthcoming.
40. Zhang Y., Brooks D.H., Franceschini M.A., Boas D.A. Eigenvector-based spatial filtering for reduction of physiological interference in diffuse optical imaging. Journal of Biomedical Optics 2005, 10(1):011014.