Spatial modeling in ecology: The flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2603-2613

  Griffith, Daniel A ^a   Peres Neto, Pedro R ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ecological community; Eigenvalue; Eigenvector; Moran coefficient; Principal coordinates of neighbor matrices; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial filter; Spatial model; Spatial structure

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EIGENVALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOLOGY; GEOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MITE;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; GEOGRAPHY; MITES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 33845354872     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bavaud, F. 1998. Models for spatial weights: a systematic look. Geographical Analysis 30:152-171.
2. Borcard, D., and P. Legendre. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecological Modelling 153:51-68.
3. Borcard, D., P. Legendre, C. Avois-Jacquet, and H. Tuomisto. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826-1832.
4. Borcard, D., P. Legendre, and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045-1055.
5. Clifford, P., S. Richardson, and D. Hémon. 1988. Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 45:123-134.
6. Cormack, R., and J. Ord. 1979. Spatial and temporal analysis in ecology. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland, USA.
7. Cressie, N. 1991. Statistics for spatial data. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
8. Dale, M. R. T., and M. J. Fortin. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. Écoscience 9:162-167.
9. Dray, S., P. Legendre, and P. R. Peres-Neto. 2006. Spatial modeling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbor matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modelling, in press.
10. Dutilleul, P. 1993. Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49:305-314.
11. Getis, A. 1990. Screening for spatial dependence in regression analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 69:69-81.
12. Getis, A. 1995. Spatial filtering in a regression framework: experiments on regional inequality, government expenditures, and urban crime. Pages 172-188 in L. Anselin and R. Florax, editors. New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
13. Getis, A., and D. Griffith. 2002. Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geographical Analysis 34:130-140.
14. Getis, A., and J. Ord. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24:189-206.
15. Griffith, D. 2000a. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem. Journal of Geographical Systems 2:141-156.
16. Griffith, D. 2000b. Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial. Linear Algebra and its Applications 321:95-112.
17. Griffith, D. 2002. A spatial filtering specification for the auto-Poisson model. Statistics and Probability Letters 58:245-251.
18. Griffith, D. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
19. Griffith, D. 2004. A spatial filtering specification for the autologistic model. Environment and Planning A 36:1791-1811.
20. He, F., J. Zhou, and H. T. Zhu. 2003. Autologistic regression model for the distribution of vegetation. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 8:205-222.
21. Kaiser, M., and N. Cressie. 1997. Modeling Poisson variables with positive spatial dependence. Statistics and Probability Letters 35:423-432.
22. Keitt, T. H., O. N. Bjørnstad, P. M. Dixon, and S. Citron-Pousty. 2002. Accounting for spatial pattern when modeling organism-environment interactions. Ecography 25:616-625.
23. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659-1673.
24. Legendre, P., M. R. T. Dale, M.-J. Fortin, J. Gurevitch, M. Hohn, and D. Myers. 2002. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25:601-615.
25. Legendre, P., and E. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
26. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
27. Lichstein, J. W., T. R. Simons, S. A. Shriner, and K. E. Franzreb. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecological Monographs 72:445-463.
28. Norcliffe, G. B. 1969. On the use and limitations of trend surface models. Canadian Geographer 13:338-348.
29. Peres-Neto, P. R. 2004. Patterns in the co-occurrence of fish species in streams: the role of site suitability, morphology and phylogeny versus species interactions. Oecologia 140:352-360.
30. Peres-Neto, P. R., P. Legendre, S. Dray, and D. Borcard. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology, in press.
31. Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyaá Series A 26:329-358.
32. Richardson, S. 1990. Some remarks on the testing of association between spatial processes. Pages 277-309 in D. Griffith, editor. Spatial statistics: past, present, and future. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
33. Ripley, B. 1977. Modeling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39:172-212.
34. Ripley, B. 1988. Statistical inference for spatial processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. Scarlett, M. J. 1972. Problems of analysis of spatial distribution. Pages 928-931 in W. P. Adams and F. M. Helleiner, editors. Congrès international de géographie. University of Toronto Press, Montreal, Canada.
36. Selmi, S, and T. Boulinier. 2001. Ecological biogeography of Southern Ocean islands: the importance of considering spatial issues. American Naturalist 158:426-437.
37. Smith, E. 2002. Ecological statistics. Pages 589-602 in A. El-Shaarawi and W. Piergorsch, editors. Encyclopedia of environmetrics. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
38. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179.
39. Tiefelsdorf, M., and D. Griffith. 2006. Semi-parametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: the eigenvector approach. Environment and Planning A, in press.
40. Tognelli, M. F., and D. A. Kelt. 2004. Analysis of determinants of mammalian species richness in South America using spatial autoregressive models. Ecography 27:427-436.
41. Wartenberg, D. 1985. Canonical trend surface analysis: a method for describing geographic pattern. Systematic Zoology 34:259-279