Dynamics of the North American continent

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 194, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 651-669

  Ghosh, A ^a   Becker, T W ^a   Humphreys, E D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cratons; Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle; Dynamics: gravity and tectonics; North America; Numerical solutions; Rheology: mantle

Indexed keywords

CRATONS; DYNAMICS OF LITHOSPHERE AND MANTLES; DYNAMICS: GRAVITY AND TECTONICS; NORTH AMERICA; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; RHEOLOGY: MANTLES;

DEFORMATION; DYNAMICS; PLANETARY SURFACE ANALYSIS; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); STRIKE-SLIP FAULTS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; TECTONICS; TRACTION CONTROL; VISCOSITY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CRATON; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEODYNAMICS; GEOID; GRAVITY FIELD; LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; MANTLE STRUCTURE; POTENTIAL ENERGY; RHEOLOGY; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; STRESS; TECTONIC PLATE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; UPPER MANTLE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880254714     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt151     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bai, W., Vigny, C., Ricard, Y. & Froidevaux, C., 1992. On the origin of deviatoric stresses in the lithosphere, J. geophys. Res., 97, 11729-11737.
2. Becker, T.W., 2006. On the effect of temperature and strain-rate viscosity on global mantle flow, net rotation, and driving forces, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 943-957.
3. Becker, T.W., 2012. On recent seismic tomography for the western United States, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, Q01W10, doi:10.1029/2011GC003977.
4. Becker, T.W. & Boschi, L., 2002. A comparison of tomographic and geodynamic mantle models, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 3, doi:2001GC000168.
5. Becker, T.W. & Faccenna, C., 2011. Mantle conveyor beneath the Tethyan collisional belt, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 310, 453-461.
6. Becker, T.W. & Kawakatsu, H., 2011. On the role of anisotropic viscosity for plate-scale flow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, doi:10.1029/2011GL048584.
7. Becker, T.W. & O'Connell, R.J., 2001. Predicting plate velocities with mantle circulation models, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 2(12), doi:10.1029/2001GC000171.
8. Becker, T.W., Schulte-Pelkum, V., Blackman, D.K., Kellogg, J.B. & O'Connell, R.J., 2006. Mantle flow under western United States from shear wave splitting, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 247, 235-251.
9. Bird, P., 1998. Testing hypotheses on plate-driving mechanisms with global lithosphere models including topography, thermal structure and faults, J. geophys. Res., 103, 10 115-10 129.
10. Bird, P., Liu, Z. & Rucker, W.K., 2008. Stresses that drive the plates from below: definitions, computational path, model optimization, and error analysis, J. geophys. Res., 113, B11406, doi:10.1029/2007JB005460.
11. Bokelmann, G.H.R., 2002. Which forces drive North America?, Geology, 30, 1027-1030.
12. Braun, J., 2010. The many surface expressions of mantle dynamics, Nature Geoscience, 3, 825-833.
13. Chambat, F., Ricard, Y. & Valette, B., 2010. Flattening of the earth: further from hydrostaticity than previously estimated, Geophys. J. Int., 183, 727-732.
14. Christensen, U., 1987. Some geodynamical effects of anisotropic viscosity, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 91, 711-736.
15. Conrad, C.P. & Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., 2002. How mantle slabs drive plate tectonics, Science, 298, doi:10.1126/science.1074161.
16. Conrad, C.P. & Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., 2006. Influence of continental roots and asthenosphere on plate-mantle coupling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05312, doi:10.1029/2005GL025621.
17. DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F. & Stein, S., 1994. Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191-2194.
18. English, J.M. & Johnston, S.T., 2004. The Laramide orogeny: what were the driving forces?, Int. Geol. Rev., 46, 833-838.
19. Fleitout, L. & Froidevoux, C., 1983. Tectonic stresses in the lithosphere, Tectonophys., 2, 315-324.
20. Flesch, L.M., Holt, W.E., Haines, A.J. & Shen-Tu, B., 2000. Dynamics of the Pacific-North American plate boundary in the western United States, Science, 287, 834-836.
21. Flesch, L.M., Haines, A.J. & Holt, W.E., 2001. Dynamics of the India- Eurasia collision zone, J. geophys. Res., 106, 16 435-16 460.
22. Flesch, L.M., Holt, W.E., Haines, A.J., Wen, L. & Shen-tu, B., 2007. The dynamics of western North America: stress magnitudes and the relative role of gravitational potential energy, plate interaction at the boundary, and basal tractions, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 866-896.
23. Forte, A., Moucha, R., Simmons, N., Grand, S. & Mitrovica, J., 2010. Deepmantle contributions to the surface dynamics of the North American continent, Tectonophys, 481, 3-15.
24. Forte, A.M., 2007. Constraints on seismic models from other disciplines- implications for mantle dynamics and composition, in Treatise of Geophysics, pp. 805-858, eds Romanowicz, B.&Dziewonski, A.M., Elsevier, Amsterdam.
25. Forte, A.M. & Perry, H.K.C., 2000. Geodynamic evidence for a chemically depleted continental tectosphere, Science, 290, 1940-1944.
26. Forte, A.M., Peltier, W.R., Dziewonski, A.M. & Woodward, R.L., 1993. Dynamic surface topography: a new interpretation based upon mantle flow models derived from seismic tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 225-228.
27. Ghosh, A. & Holt, W.E., 2012. Plate motions and stresses from global dynamic models, Science, 335, 838-843.
28. Ghosh, A., Holt, W.E., Wen, L., Haines, A.J. & Flesch, L.M., 2008. Joint modeling of lithosphere and mantle dynamics elucidating lithosphere-mantle coupling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L16309, doi:10.1029/2008GL034365.
29. Ghosh, A., Holt, W.E. & Flesch, L.M., 2009. Contribution of gravitational potential energy differences to the global stress field, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 787-812.
30. Ghosh, A., Becker, T.W. & Zhong, S.J., 2010. Effect of lateral viscosity variations on the geoid, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L01301, doi:10.1029/2009GL040426.
31. Ghosh, A., Holt, W.E. & Wen, L., 2013. Predicting the lithospheric stress field and plate motions by joint modeling of lithosphere and mantle dynamics, J. geophys. Res., 118, 346-368.
32. Gilbert, L.E. & Scholz, C.H., 1994. Strain localization along the San Andreas fault: consequences for loading mechanisms, J. geophys. Res., 99, 23 975-23 984.
33. Gudmundsson, O. & Sambridge, M., 1998. A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) seismic model, J. geophys. Res., 103, 7121-7136.
34. Han, D. & Wahr, J., 1997. An analysis of anisotropic mantle viscosity, and its possible effects on postglacial rebound, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 102, 33-50.
35. Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfeb, D. & Müller, B., 2008. The World Stress Map database release 2008, doi:10.1594/GFZ.WSM. Rel2008.
36. Humphreys, E.&Coblentz, D., 2007. NorthAmerican dynamics andwestern U.S. tectonics, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG3001, doi:10.1029/2005RG000181.
37. Husson, L., Conrad, C.P. & Faccenna, C., 2008. Tethyan closure, Andean orogeny, and westward drift of the Pacific Basin, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 271, 303-310.
38. Jackson, J., 2002. Faulting, flow, and the strength of the continental lithosphere, Int. Geol. Rev., 44, 39-61.
39. Jones, C.H., Unruh, J. & Sonder, L., 1996. The role of gravitational potential energy in active deformation in the southwestern United States, Nature, 381, 37-41.
40. Jordan, T.H., 1978. Composition and development of the continental tectosphere, Nature, 274, 544-548.
41. King, S.D. & Hager, B.H., 1990. The relationship between plate velocity and trench viscosity in newtonian and power-law subduction calculations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 2409-2412.
42. Kreemer, C., Holt, W.E. & Haines, A.J., 2003. An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation, Geophys. J. Int., 154, 8-34.
43. Lebedev, S. & van der Hilst, R.D., 2008. Global upper-mantle tomogarphy with the automated multimode inversion of surface and s-wave forms, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 505-518.
44. Lev, E. & Hager, B.H., 2008. Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities with anisotropic lithospheric viscosity, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 806-814.
45. Lev, E. & Hager, B.H., 2011. Anisotropic viscosity changes subduction zone thermal structure, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 12, Q04009, doi:10.1029/2010GC003382.
46. Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.&Guynn, J.H., 2004. Origin of the lithospheric stress field, J. geophys. Res., 109, B01408, doi:10.1029/2003JB002467.
47. Liu, L., Gurnis, M., Seton, M., Saleeby, J., Müller, R.D. & Jackson, J.M., 2010. The role of oceanic plateau subduction in the Laramide orogeny, Nat. Geosci., 3, 353-357.
48. Liu, Z. & Bird, P., 2002. North america plate is driven westward by lower mantle flow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(24), doi:10.1029/2002GL016002.
49. Livacarri, R.F., 1991. Role of crustal thickening and extensional collapse in the tectonic evolution of the sevier-laramide oro- geny, western united states, Geology, 19, 1104-1107.
50. Mayer-Guerr, T., 2006. Gravitationsfeldbestimmung aus der analyse kurzer bahnbogen am beispiel der satellitenmissionen CHAMP und GRACE, PhD thesis, University of Bonn, Germany.
51. Nakiboglu, S.M., 1982. Hydrostatic theory of the Earth and its mechanical implications, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 28, 302-311.
52. Naliboff, J.B., Conrad, C.P. & Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., 2009. Modification of the lithospheric stress field by lateral variations in plate-mantle coupling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L22307, doi:10.1029/2009GL040484.
53. Nataf, H. & Ricard, Y., 1996. 3smac: an a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modeling, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 95, 101-122.
54. Panasyuk, S.V. & Hager, B.H., 2000. Models of isostatic and dynamic topography, geoid anomalies, and their uncertainties, J. geophys. Res., 105, 28 199-28 209.
55. Platt, J.P., Kaus, B. & Becker, T.W., 2008. The mechanics of continental transforms: an alternative approach with applications to the San Andreas system and the tectonics of California, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 274, 380-391.
56. Pouilloux, L., Kaminski, E. & Labrosse, S., 2007. Anisotropic rheology of a cubic medium and implications for geological materials, Geophys. J. Int., 170, 876-885.
57. Ricard, Y.& Vigny, C., 1989. Mantle dynamics with induced plate tectonics, J. geophys. Res., 94, 5987-6002.
58. Schmandt, B. & Humphreys, E., 2010. Complex subduction and smallscale convection revealed by body wave tomography of the western u.s. upper mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 11, Q05004, doi:10.1029/2010GC003042.
59. Silver, P. & Holt, W.E., 2002. The mantle flow field beneath western North America, Science, 295, 1054-1057.
60. Simmons, N.A., Forte, A.M. & Grand, S.P., 2007. Thermochemical structure and dynamics of the african superplume, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, doi:10.1029/2006GL028009.
61. Sonder, L.J. & Jones, C.H., 1999. Western united states extension: how the west was widened, Annu. Rev. Earth planet. Sci., 27, 417-462.
62. Spencer, J.E., 1996. Uplift of the Colorado Plateau due to lithospheric attenuation during Laramide low-angle subduction, J. geophys. Res., 101, 13 595-13 609.
63. Stadler, G., Gurnis, M., Burstedde, C., Wilcox, L.C., Alisic, L. & Ghattas, O., 2010. The dynamics of plate tectonics and mantle flow: from local to global scales, Science, 329, 1033-1038.
64. Steinberger, B., Schmeling, H. & Marquart, G., 2001. Large-scale lithospheric stress field and topography induced by global mantle circulation, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 186, 75-91.
65. van Summeren, J., Conrad, C.P. & Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., 2012. The importance of slab pull and a global asthenosphere to plate motions, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13(1), Q0AK03, doi:10.1029/2011GC003873.
66. Wesnousky, S.G. & Scholz, C.H., 1980. The craton: its effect on the distribution of seismicity and stress in north america, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 48, 348-355.
67. Zhong, S., Zuber, M.T., Moresi, L.N. & Gurnis, M., 2000. The role of temperature-dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection, J. geophys. Res., 105, 11 063-11 082.
68. Zhong, S.J. & Gurnis, M., 1995a. Mantle convection with plates and mobile, faulted plate margins, Science, 267, 838-843.
69. Zhong, S.J. & Gurnis, M., 1995b. Towards a realistic simulation of plate margins in mantle convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 981-984.
70. Zoback, M.D., 2000. Strength of the San Andreas, Nature, 405, 31-32.
71. Zoback, M.D. & Zoback, M.L., 1981. State of stress and intraplate earthquakesin the united states, Science, 213, 96-104.
72. Zoback, M.L. & Zoback, M.D., 1980. State of stressin the conterminous united states, J. geophys. Res., 85, 6113-6156.