Modification of visual cortical receptive field induced by natural stimuli

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1923-1932

  Zhu, Yingjie ^a,b   Yao, Haishan ^a  

^a Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People s Hospital   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

natural scenes; NMDA receptors; plasticity; primary visual cortex; spatiotemporal correlation

Indexed keywords

N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SYNAPSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

NATURAL SCENES; NMDA RECEPTORS; PLASTICITY; PRIMARY VISUAL CORTEX; SPATIOTEMPORAL CORRELATION;

ANIMALS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84880250081     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs178     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Antonini A, Stryker MP. 1993. Rapid remodeling of axonal arbors in the visual cortex. Science. 260:1819-1821.
2. Attneave F. 1954. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev. 61:183-193.
3. Barlow HB. 1961. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith WA, editors. Sensory communication. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 217-234.
4. Bear MF. 1996. A synaptic basis for memory storage in the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:13453-13459.
5. Bi GQ, Poo MM. 1998. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocam-pal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 18:10464-10472.
6. Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. 1998. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci. 21:149-186.
7. Caporale N, Dan Y. 2008. Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. Annu Rev Neurosci. 31:25-46.
8. Cruikshank SJ, Weinberger NM. 1996. Receptive-field plasticity in the adult auditory cortex induced by Hebbian covariance. J Neurosci. 16:861-875.
9. Dahmen JC, Hartley DE, King AJ. 2008. Stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity of cortical frequency representation. J Neurosci. 28:13629-13639.
10. Dan Y, Poo MM. 2004. Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron. 44:23-30.
11. David SV, Vinje WE, Gallant JL. 2004. Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons. J Neurosci. 24:6991-7006.
12. Dayan P, Abbott LF. 2001. Theoretical neuroscience. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
13. Dong DW, Atick JJ. 1995. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network. 6:345-358.
14. Dragoi V, Sharma J, Sur M. 2000. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron. 28:287-298.
15. Engert F, Bonhoeffer T. 1997. Synapse specificity of long-term poten-tiation breaks down at short distances. Nature. 388:279-284.
16. Eyding D, Schweigart G, Eysel UT. 2002. Spatio-temporal plasticity of cortical receptive fields in response to repetitive visual stimulation in the adult cat. Neuroscience. 112:195-215.
17. Eysel UT, Eyding D, Schweigart G. 1998. Repetitive optical stimulation elicits fast receptive field changes in mature visual cortex. Neuroreport. 9:949-954.
18. Feldman DE. 2009. Synaptic mechanisms for plasticity in neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 32:33-55.
19. Felsen G, Touryan J, Han F, Dan Y. 2005. Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes. PLoS Biol. 3:e342.
20. Field DJ. 1987. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A. 4:2379-2394.
21. Fitzsimonds RM, Song HJ, Poo MM. 1997. Propagation of activity-dependent synaptic depression in simple neural networks. Nature. 388:439-448.
22. Fox K, Sato H, Daw N. 1989. The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex. J Neurosci. 9:2443-2454.
23. Frégnac Y, Shulz D, Thorpe S, Bienenstock E. 1992. Cellular analogs of visual cortical epigenesis. I. Plasticity of orientation selectivity. J Neurosci. 12:1280-1300.
24. Frenkel MY, Sawtell NB, Diogo AC, Yoon B, Neve RL, Bear MF. 2006. Instructive effect of visual experience in mouse visual cortex. Neuron. 51:339-349.
25. Froemke RC, Dan Y. 2002. Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature. 416:433-438.
26. Fu YX, Djupsund K, Gao H, Hayden B, Shen K, Dan Y. 2002. Temporal specificity in the cortical plasticity of visual space representation. Science. 296:1999-2003.
27. Gilbert CD. 1998. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiol Rev. 78:467-485.
28. Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN. 1992. Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature. 356:150-152.
29. Haider B, Krause MR, Duque A, Yu Y, Touryan J, Mazer JA, McCor-mick DA. 2010. Synaptic and network mechanisms of sparse and reliable visual cortical activity during nonclassical receptive field stimulation. Neuron. 65:107-121.
30. Hebb DO. 1949. The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley.
31. Hirsch JA, Gilbert CD. 1993. Long-term changes in synaptic strength along specific intrinsic pathways in the cat visual cortex. J Physiol. 461:247-262.
32. Jacob V, Brasier DJ, Erchova I, Feldman D, Shulz DE. 2007. Spike timing-dependent synaptic depression in the in vivo barrel cortex of the rat. J Neurosci. 27:1271-1284.
33. Jones JP, Palmer LA. 1987. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 58:1187-1211.
34. Kaas JH, Krubitzer LA, Chino YM, Langston AL, Polley EH, Blair N. 1990. Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science. 248:229-231.
35. Karmarkar UR, Dan Y. 2006. Experience-dependent plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron. 52:577-585.
36. Li Y, Van Hooser SD, Mazurek M, White LE, Fitzpatrick D. 2008. Experience with moving visual stimuli drives the early development of cortical direction selectivity. Nature. 456:952-956.
37. Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. 1999. Long-term potentiation-a decade of progress? Science. 285:1870-1874.
38. Malone BJ, Kumar VR, Ringach DL. 2007. Dynamics of receptive field size in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 97:407-414.
39. Meliza CD, Dan Y. 2006. Receptive-field modification in rat visual cortex induced by paired visual stimulation and single-cell spiking. Neuron. 49:183-189.
40. Miller KD, Chapman B, Stryker MP. 1989. Visual responses in adult cat visual cortex depend on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:5183-5187.
41. Priebe NJ, Ferster D. 2008. Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. Neuron. 57:482-497.
42. Rolls ET, Tovee MJ. 1995. Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 73:713-726.
43. Schoups A, Vogels R, Qian N, Orban G. 2001. Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature. 412:549-553.
44. Schuett S, Bonhoeffer T, Hubener M. 2001. Pairing-induced changes of orientation maps in cat visual cortex. Neuron. 32:325-337.
45. Sharpee TO, Sugihara H, Kurgansky AV, Rebrik SP, Stryker MP, Miller KD. 2006. Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature. 439:936-942.
46. Shulz D, Frégnac Y. 1992. Cellular analogs of visual cortical epigenesis. II. Plasticity of binocular integration. J Neurosci. 12:1301-1318.
47. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA. 2001. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 24:1193-1216.
48. Sjostrom PJ, Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. 2001. Rate, timing, and coop-erativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 32:1149-1164.
49. Tao HW, Zhang LI, Engert F, Poo M. 2001. Emergence of input specificity of ltp during development of retinotectal connections in vivo. Neuron. 31:569-580.
50. van Hateren JH, Ruderman DL. 1998. Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc Biol Sci. 265:2315-2320.
51. Vinje WE, Gallant JL. 2000. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science. 287: 1273-1276.
52. Vislay-Meltzer RL, Kampff AR, Engert F. 2006. Spatiotemporal specificity of neuronal activity directs the modification of receptive fields in the developing retinotectal system. Neuron. 50:101-114.
53. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. 1963. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol. 26: 1003-1017.
54. Yao H, Dan Y. 2001. Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in cortical processing of orientation. Neuron. 32:315-323.
55. Yao H, Shen Y, Dan Y. 2004. Intracortical mechanism of stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity in visual cortical orientation tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:5081-5086.
56. Yao H, Shi L, Han F, Gao H, Dan Y. 2007. Rapid learning in cortical coding of visual scenes. Nat Neurosci. 10:772-778.
57. Zhou Q, Tao HW, Poo MM. 2003. Reversal and stabilization of synap-tic modifications in a developing visual system. Science. 300: 1953-1957.