Somatotopic finger mapping using MEG: Toward an optimal stimulation paradigm

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 124, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1659-1670

  Jamali, Shahab ^a   Ross, Bernhard ^b  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dipole modeling; Frequency tagging; Neuromagnetic source analysis; Primary somatosensory cortex; Somatosensory steady state response; Somatotopic organization; Vibrotactile stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MIDDLE FINGER; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULATION; VIBROTACTILE AID;

95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; 95% CONFIDENCE RADIUS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANOVA; CI(95); CR(95); D1; D2; DIPOLE MODELING; ECD; EEG; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUIVALENT CURRENT DIPOLE; FMRI; FREQUENCY TAGGING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GOF; GOODNESS OF FIT; I-S; INDEX FINGER; INFERIOR-SUPERIOR; INTER-STIMULUS INTERVAL; INTER-TRAIN INTERVAL; ISI; ITI; L-M; LATERAL-MEDIAL; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MANOVA; MEG; MIDDLE FINGER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; NEUROMAGNETIC SOURCE ANALYSIS; P-A; PCA; PEARSON-FILON STATISTICS; POSTERIOR-ANTERIOR; POUND PER SQUARE INCH; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSI; SEF; SI; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SNR; SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED MAGNETIC FIELD; SOMATOSENSORY STEADY-STATE RESPONSE; SOMATOTOPIC ORGANIZATION; SSR; STEADY-STATE RESPONSE; VIBROTACTILE STIMULATION; ZPF;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880178056     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Altamura C., Torquati K., Zappasodi F., Ferretti A., Pizzella V., Tibuzzi F., et al. FMRI-vs-MEG evaluation of post-stroke interhemispheric asymmetries in primary sensorimotor hand areas. Exp Neurol 2007, 204:631-639.
2. Angel R.W., Quick W.M., Boylls C.C., Weinrich M., Rodnitzky R.L. Decrement of somatosensory evoked potentials during repetitive stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985, 60:335-342.
3. Bardouille T., Picton T.W., Ross B. Attention modulates beta oscillations during prolonged tactile stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 31:761-769.
4. Baumgartner C., Doppelbauer A., Deecke L., Barth D.S., Zeitlhofer J., Lindinger G., et al. Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1991, 87:641-648.
5. Biermann K., Schmitz F., Witte O.W., Konczak J., Freund H.J., Schnitzler A. Interaction of finger representation in the human first somatosensory cortex: a neuromagnetic study. Neurosci Lett 1998, 251:13-16.
6. Brenner D., Lipton J., Kaufman L., Williamson S.J. Somatically evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 1978, 199:81-83.
7. Darvas F., Rautiainen M., Pantazis D., Baillet S., Benali H., Mosher J.C., et al. Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap. Neuroimage 2005, 25:355-368.
8. Diesch E., Preissl H., Haerle M., Schaller H.E., Birbaumer N. Multiple frequency steady-state evoked magnetic field mapping of digit representation in primary somatosensory cortex. Somatosens Mot Res 2001, 18:10-18.
9. Druschky K., Kaltenhauser M., Hummel C., Druschky A., Huk W.J., Neundorfer B., et al. Post-apoplectic reorganization of cortical areas processing passive movement and tactile stimulation: a neuromagnetic case study. Neuroreport 2002, 13:2581-2586.
10. Elbert T., Pantev C., Wienbruch C., Rockstroh B., Taub E. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 1995, 270:305-307.
11. Ferris JR, Brimhall KR, Vanesky FW, Buchanan DS, Warden L. Nonmagnetic tactile stimulator and biomagnetometer utilizing the stimulator. US Patent No. 5,220,921; 1993.
12. Feys H., Van Hees J., Bruyninckx F., Mercelis R., De Weerdt W. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000, 68:323-331.
13. Forss N., Hietanen M., Salonen O., Hari R. Modified activation of somatosensory cortical network in patients with right-hemisphere stroke. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 10):1889-1899.
14. Fruhstorfer H., Soveri P., Järvilehto T. Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970, 28:153-161.
15. Gallien P., Aghulon C., Durufle A., Petrilli S., de Crouy A.C., Carsin M., et al. Magnetoencephalography in stroke: a 1-year follow-up study. Eur J Neurol 2003, 10:373-382.
16. Gandevia S.C., Hall L.A., McCloskey D.I., Potter E.K. Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol 1983, 335:507-517.
17. Gelnar P.A., Krauss B.R., Szeverenyi N.M., Apkarian A.V. Fingertip representation in the human somatosensory cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 1998, 7:261-283.
18. Giabbiconi C.M., Dancer C., Zopf R., Gruber T., Müller M.M. Selective spatial attention to left or right hand flutter sensation modulates the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004, 20:58-66.
19. Godde B., Ehrhardt J., Braun C. Behavioral significance of input-dependent plasticity of human somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport 2003, 14:543-546.
20. Hamada Y., Otsuka S., Okamoto T., Suzuki R. The profile of the recovery cycle in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: a magnetoencephalography study. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:1787-1793.
21. Hari R., Joutsiniemi S.L., Sarvas J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988, 71:64-72.
22. Hari R., Karhu J., Hämäläinen M., Knuutila J., Salonen O., Sams M., et al. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur J Neurosci 1993, 5:724-734.
23. Hoechstetter K., Rupp A., Stancak A., Meinck H.M., Stippich C., Berg P., et al. Interaction of tactile input in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex-a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage 2001, 14:759-767.
24. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998, 22:324-333.
25. Hsieh C.L., Shima F., Tobimatsu S., Sun S.J., Kato M. The interaction of the somatosensory evoked potentials to simultaneous finger stimuli in the human central nervous system. A study using direct recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 96:135-142.
26. Huang R.S., Chen C.F., Tran A.T., Holstein K.L., Sereno M.I. Mapping multisensory parietal face and body areas in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:18114-18119.
27. Ishibashi H., Tobimatsu S., Shigeto H., Morioka T., Yamamoto T., Fukui M. Differential interaction of somatosensory inputs in the human primary sensory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1095-1102.
28. Jamali S., Ross B. Precise mapping of the somatotopic hand area using neuromagnetic steady-state responses. Brain Res 2012, 1455:28-39.
29. Kobayashi T., Kuriki S. Principal component elimination method for the improvement of S/N in evoked neuromagnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 46:951-958.
30. Lagerlund T., Sharbrough F., Busacker N. Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition. J Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 14:73-82.
31. Lehmann D., Michel C. Intracerebral dipole source localization for FFT power maps. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990, 76:271-276.
32. Liu L., Ioannides A.A. MEG study of short-term plasticity following multiple digit frequency discrimination training in humans. Brain Topogr 2004, 16:239-243.
33. Mazziotta J., Toga A., Evans A., Fox P., Lancaster J., Zilles K., et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001, 356:1293-1322.
34. McLaughlin D.F., Kelly E.F. Evoked potentials as indices of adaptation in the somatosensory system in humans: a review and prospectus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1993, 18:151-206.
35. Mogilner A., Grossman J.A., Ribary U., Joliot M., Volkmann J., Rapaport D., et al. Somatosensory cortical plasticity in adult humans revealed by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:3593-3597.
36. Nakamura A., Yamada T., Goto A., Kato T., Ito K., Abe Y., et al. Somatosensory homunculus as drawn by MEG. Neuroimage 1998, 7:377-386.
37. Nangini C., Ross B., Tam F., Graham S. Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 33:252-262.
38. Noss R.S., Boles C.D., Yingling C.D. Steady-state analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 100:453-461.
39. Ogura Y., Sekihara K. Relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993, 40:919-924.
40. Okada Y.C., Tanenbaum R., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L. Somatotopic organization of the human somatosensory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic measurements. Exp Brain Res 1984, 56:197-205.
41. Penfield W., Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937, 60:389-443.
42. Pollok B., Moll M., Schmitz F., Müller K., Schnitzler A. Rapid mapping of finger representations in human primary somatosensory cortex applying neuromagnetic steady-state responses. Neuroreport 2002, 13:235-238.
43. Raghunathan T., Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychol Methods 1996, 1:178-183.
44. Robinson S., Rose D. Current source imaging estimation by spatially filtered MEG. Biomagnetism: clinical aspects 1992, 761-765. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica. M. Hoke, S. Erne, Y. Okada, G. Romani (Eds.).
45. Rossini P.M., Dal Forno G. Neuronal post-stroke plasticity in the adult. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004, 22:193-206.
46. Rossini P.M., Tecchio F., Pizzella V., Lupoi D., Cassetta E., Pasqualetti P., et al. On the reorganization of sensory hand areas after mono-hemispheric lesion: a functional (MEG)/anatomical (MRI) integrative study. Brain Res 1998, 782:153-166.
47. Rossini P.M., Tecchio F., Pizzella V., Lupoi D., Cassetta E., Pasqualetti P. Interhemispheric differences of sensory hand areas after monohemispheric stroke: MEG/MRI integrative study. Neuroimage 2001, 14:474-485.
48. Rossini P.M., Altamura C., Ferreri F., Melgari J.M., Tecchio F., Tombini M., et al. Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura Medicophys 2007, 43:241-254.
49. Severens M., Farquhar J., Desain P., Duysens J., Gielen C. Transient and steady-state responses to mechanical stimulation of different fingers reveal interactions based on lateral inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:2090-2096.
50. Simon J.Z., Wang Y. Fully complex magnetoencephalography. J Neurosci Methods 2005, 149:64-73.
51. Snyder A.Z. Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 84:257-268.
52. Taub E., Uswatte G., Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:228-236.
53. Tecchio F., Zappasodi F., Tombini M., Oliviero A., Pasqualetti P., Vernieri F., et al. Brain plasticity in recovery from stroke: an MEG assessment. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1326-1334.
54. Tobimatsu S., Zhang Y.M., Kato M. Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1953-1958.
55. Wang A.L., Mouraux A., Liang M., Iannetti G.D. Stimulus novelty, and not neural refractoriness, explains the repetition suppression of laser-evoked potentials. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104:2116-2124.
56. Weiss T., Miltner W.H., Huonker R., Friedel R., Schmidt I., Taub E. Rapid functional plasticity of the somatosensory cortex after finger amputation. Exp Brain Res 2000, 134:199-203.
57. Wienbruch C., Candia V., Svensson J., Kleiser R., Kollias S. A portable and low-cost fMRI compatible pneumatic system for the investigation of the somatosensensory system in clinical and research environments. Neurosci Lett 2006, 398:183-188.
58. Wikström H., Roine R.O., Aronen H.J., Salonen O., Sinkkonen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., et al. Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Ann Neurol 2000, 47:353-360.
59. Xerri C. Plasticity of cortical maps: multiple triggers for adaptive reorganization following brain damage and spinal cord injury. Neuroscientist 2012, 18:133-148.