Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex

NeuroImage

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 252-262

  Nangini, C ^a   Ross, B ^a,b   Tam, F ^c   Graham, S J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Magnetoencephalography; Somatosensory cortex; Somatosensory evoked field; Steady state responses; Tactile stimulation; Transient responses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIPOLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STEADY STATE; TACTILE STIMULATION; VIBRATION;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; VIBRATION;

EID: 33748691792     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.045     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Diesch E., Preissl H., Haerle M., Schaller H., and Birbaumer N. Multiple frequency steady-state evoked magnetic field mapping of digit representation in primary somatosensory cortex. Somatosens. Motor Res. 18 1 (2001) 10-18
2. Draganova R., Ross B., Borgmann C., and Pantev C. Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear Hear. 23 3 (2002) 254-265
3. Elbert T., Junghofer M., Scholz B., and Schneider S. The separation of overlapping neuromagnetic sources in first and secondary somatosensory cortices. Brain Topogr. 7 4 (1995) 275-282
4. Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V., and Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear. Res. 148 (2000) 153-160
5. Forss N., Salmelin R., and Hari R. Comparison of somatosensory evoked fields to airpuff and electric stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 6 (1994) 510-517
6. Forss N., Narici L., and Hari R. Sustained activation of the human SII cortices by stimulus trains. NeuroImage 13 (2001) 497-501
7. Fruhstorfer H., Soveri P., and Jarvilehto T. Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28 2 (1970) 153-161
8. Gardner E. Somatosensory cortical mechanism of feature detection in tactile and kinesthetic discrimination. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 66 (1987) 439-454
9. Gardner E., Palmer C., Hamalainen M., and Warren S. Simulation of motion on the skin. V. Effect of stimulus temporal frequency on the representation of moving bar patterns in primary somatosensory cortex of monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 67 1 (1992) 37-63
10. Giabbiconi C., Dancer C., Zopf R., Gruber T., and Muller M. Selective spatial attention to left or right hand flutter sensation modulates the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 20 1 (2004) 58-66
11. Graham S.J., Staines W.R., Nelson A., Plewes D.B., and McIlroy W.E. New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 46 (2001) 436-442
12. Hamada Y., Otsuka S., Okamoto T., and Suzuki R. The profile of the recovery cycle in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 11 (2002) 1787-1793
13. Hamalainen H., Kekoni J., Sams M., Reinikainen K., and Naatanen R. Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75 2 (1990) 13-21
14. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O. Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 2 (1993) 413-497
15. Hari R., and Forss N. Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B Biol. Sci. 354 1387 (1999) 1145-1154
16. Hari R., Karhu J., Hamalainen M., Knuutila J., Salonen O., Sams M., and Vilkman V. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 5 6 (1993) 724-734
17. Herdman A.T., Wollbrink A., Chau W., Ishii R., Ross B., and Pantev C. Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperature magnetometry. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 995-1005
18. Huttunen J., Jaaskelainen I., Hirvonen J., Kaakkola S., Ilmoniemi R., and Pekkonen E. Scopolamine reduces the P35m and P60m deflections of the human somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. NeuroReport 12 3 (2001) 619-623
19. Ioannides A.A., Kostopoulos G.K., Laskaris N.A., Liu L., Shibata T., Schellens M., Poghosyan V., and Khurshudyan A. Timing and connectivity in the human somatosensory cortex from single trial mass electrical activity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15 4 (2002) 231-246
20. Jousmaki V., and Hari R. Somatosensory evoked fields to large-area vibrotactile stimuli. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 905-909
21. Kelly E., and Folger S. EEG evidence of stimulus-directed response dynamics in human somatosensory cortex. Brain Res. 815 2 (1999) 326-336
22. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., and Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412 6843 (2001) 150-157
23. Lu Z., Williamson S., and Kaufman L. Behavioural lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures. Science 258 5088 (1992) 1668-1670
24. Mauguiere F., Merlet I., Forss N., Vanni S., Jousmaki V., Adeleine P., and Hari R. Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: location and activation timing of SEF sources. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 4 (1997) 281-289
25. McLaughlin D.F., and Kelly E.F. Evoked potentials as indices of adaptation in the somatosensory system in humans: a review and prospectus. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 18 2 (1993) 151-206
26. Muller G., Neuper C., and Pfurtscheller G. "Resonance-like" frequencies of sensorimotor areas evoked by repetitive tactile stimulation. Biomed Tech. (Berl.) 46 7-8 (2001) 186-190
27. Nagamine T., Makela J., Mima T., Mikuni N., Nishitani N., Satoh T., Ikeda H., and Shibasaki H. Serial processing of the somesthetic information revealed by different effects of stimulus rate on the somatosensory-evoked potentials and magnetic fields. Brain Res. 791 1-2 (1998) 200-208
28. Nakamura A., Yamada T., Goto A., Kato T., Ito K., Abe Y., Kachi T., and Kakigi R. Somatosensory homunculus as drawn by MEG. NeuroImage 7 4 Pt. 1 (1998) 377-386
29. Pantev C. Evoked and induced gamma-band activity of the human cortex. Brain Topogr. 7 4 (1995) 321-330
30. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., and Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45 2 (1978) 186-197
31. Picton T.W., Skinner C.R., Champagne S.C., Kellett A.J., and Maiste A.C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 1 (1987) 165-178
32. Pollok B., Moll M., Schmitz F., Muller K., and Schnitzler A. Rapid mapping of finger representations in human primary somatosensory cortex applying neuromagnetic steady-state responses. NeuroReport 13 2 (2002) 235-238
33. Preissl H., Flor H., Lutzenberger W., Duffner F., Freudenstein D., Grote E., and Birbaumer N. Early activation of the primary somatosensory cortex without conscious awareness of somatosensory stimuli in tumor patients. Neurosci. Lett. 308 3 (2001) 193-196
34. Regan D. Comparison of transient and steady-state methods. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 388 (1982) 45-71
35. Restuccia D., Valeriani M., Grassi E., Gentili G., Mazza S., Tonali P., and Mauguiere F. Contribution of GABA-ergic cortical circuitry in shaping somatosensory evoked scalp responses: specific changes after single-dose administration of tiagabine. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 (2002) 656-671
36. Robinson S., and Rose D. Current source imaging estimation by spatially filtered MEG. In: Hoke M., Erne S., Okada Y., and Romani G. (Eds). Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects (1992), Excerpta, Amsterdam 761-765
37. Ross B., and Pantev C. Auditory steady-state responses reveal amplitude modulation gap detection thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 5 (2004) 2193-2206 (Pt. 1)
38. Ross B., Picton T.W., and Pantev C. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear. Res. 165 1-2 (2002) 68-84
39. Sannita W., Bandini F., Beelke M., De Carli F., Carozzo S., Gesino D., Mazzella L., Ogliastro C., and Narici L. Time dynamics of stimulus- and event-related gamma band activity: contrast-VEPs and the visual P300 in man. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 12 (2001) 2241-2249
40. Simoes C., Mertens M., Forss N., Jousmaki V., Lutkenhoner B., and Hari R. Functional overlap of finger representations in human SI and SII cortices. J. Neurophysiol. 86 (2001) 1661-1665
41. Snyder A. Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 3 (1992) 257-268
42. Tannan V., Dennis R., and Tommerdahl M. Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity. Behav. Brain Funct. 10 (2005) 1:18
43. Tesche C., Uusitalo M., Ilmoniemi R., Huotilainen M., Kajola M., and Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 3 (1995) 189-200
44. Tobimatsu S., Zhang Y., and Kato M. Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 1953-1958
45. Tomberg C., Desmedt J., Ozaki I., Nguyen T., and Chalklin V. Mapping somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation at intervals of 450 to 4000 msec and the issue of habituation when assessing early cognitive components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 74 (1989) 347-358
46. Tommerdahl M., Favorov O., Whitsel B., Nakhle B., and Gonchar Y. Minicolumnar activation patterns in cat and monkey SI cortex. Cereb. Cortex 3 5 (1993) 399-411
47. Tuunanen P., Kavec M., Jousmaki V., Usenius J., Hari R., Salmelin R., and Kauppinen R. Comparison of BOLD fMRI and MEG characteristics to vibrotactile stimulation. NeuroImage 19 4 (2003) 1778-1786
48. Wikstrom H., Huttunen J., Korvenoja A., Virtanen J., Salonen O., Aronen H., and Ilmoniemi R. Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs): a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 6 (1996) 479-487