Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1015-1021

  Cheng, Jun Ge ^a   Zhang, Zhi Ling ^a   Wang, Xiao Yan ^a   Zhang, Zu Yan ^a   Ma, Xu Chen ^a   Li, Gang ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cone beam computerized tomography; Detection accuracy; Digital intraoral radiography; Proximal caries; Spatial resolution

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STANDARD; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PULP; DENTIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 84864279164     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0599-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Stookey GK, Jackson RD, Zandona AG, Analoui M (1999) Dental caries diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 43: 665-677.
2. Robinson C (2009) Fluoride and the caries lesion: interactions and mechanism of action. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 10: 136-140.
3. Wenzel A (1998) Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27: 3-11.
4. Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2008) What is cone-beam CT and how does it work. Dent Clin North Am 52: 707-730.
5. Ludlow JB, Mol A (2009) Digital imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds) Oral radiology: principle and interpretation, 6th edn. Mosby, Inc., Maryland Heights, pp 83-84.
6. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37: 18-22.
7. Berkey CS, Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Chauncey HH, McNeil BJ (1990) Statistical methods for comparing dental diagnostic procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 18: 169-176.
8. Obuchowski NA (2003) Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 229: 3-8.
9. Sanderink GC, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman SE (1994) Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78: 125-132.
10. Verdonschot EH, Wenzel A, Bronkhorst EM (1993) Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21: 269-272.
11. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Yuksel SP, Cebeci ARI, Paksoy CS (2010) Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109: e63-e69.
12. Liedke GS, Da Silveira HE, Da Silveira HL, Dutra V, De Figueiredo JA (2009) Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod 35: 233-235.
13. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang LL (2009) Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108: 939-945.
14. Young SM, Lee JT, Hodges RJ, Chang TL, Elashoff DA, White SC (2009) A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38: 445-451.
15. Danforth RA, Clark DE (2000) Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89: 236-243.
16. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL (2003) Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32: 229-234.
17. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3 G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35: 219-226.
18. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139: 1237-1243.
19. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al (2010) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. doi: 10. 1016/j. ejrad. 2010. 11. 028.
20. Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC (2010) Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endod 110: 770-776.