Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 959-966

  Spin Neto, Rubens ^a,b   Marcantonio Jr , Elcio ^a   Gotfredsen, Erik ^b   Wenzel, Ann ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bone graft; CBCT; Plane definition; Slice thickness; Windowing

Indexed keywords

BONE GRAFT; CBCT; PLANE DEFINITION; SLICE THICKNESS; WINDOWING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; RATING; SOFTWARE TESTING; STANDARDIZATION;

BONE;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STOMATOGNATHIC SYSTEM;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STOMATOGNATHIC SYSTEM;

EID: 84855590761     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9377-y     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P: Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 106:527-551, 1998 (Pubitemid 128736225)
2. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, et al: Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontol 19:151-163, 2000
3. Bauer TW, Muschler GF: Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:10-27, 2000 (Pubitemid 30090817)
4. Eppley BL, Pietrzak WS, Blanton MW: Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. J Craniofac Surg 16:981-989, 2005 (Pubitemid 44383886)
5. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E: Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36(Suppl 3):20-27, 2005
6. Ehrhart N, Kraft S, Conover D, Rosier RN, Schwarz EM: Quantification of massive allograft healing with dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and cone beam-CT: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1897-1904, 2008
7. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR: Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:460-470, 2009
8. Peck D: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. J Nucl Med 50:1384, 2009
9. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR: Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609-625, 2009
10. Honma K, Kobayashi T, Nakajima T, Hayasi T: Computed tomographic evaluation of bone formation after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:1209-1213, 1999 (Pubitemid 29468365)
11. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K, Hirsch JM: A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:157-161, 2001 (Pubitemid 33695404)
12. Verdugo F, Simonian K, Smith McDonald R, Nowzari H: Quantitation of mandibular ramus volume as a source of bone grafting. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11(Suppl 1):e32-37, 2009
13. Lai RF, Zou H, Kong WD, Lin W: Applied anatomic site study of palatal anchorage implants using cone beam computed tomography. International Journal of Oral Science 2:98-104, 2010
14. Swennen GR, Schutyser F: Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:410-416, 2006 (Pubitemid 44376705)
15. Cevidanes LH, et al: Three-dimensional surgical simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:361-371, 2010
16. Ganz SD: Bone grafting assessment: focus on the anterior and posterior maxilla utilizing advanced 3-D imaging technologies. Dent Implantol Update 20:41-48, 2009
17. Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A: Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:499-505, 2010
18. Verdugo F, Simonian K, D'Addona A, Ponton J, Nowzari H: Human bone repair after mandibular symphysis block harvesting: a clinical and tomographic study. J Periodontol 81:702-709, 2010
19. Block MS, Haggerty CJ: Interpositional osteotomy for posterior mandible ridge augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:31-39, 2009
20. Takane M, et al: Clinical application of cone beam computed tomography for ideal absorbable membrane placement in interproximal bone defects. J Oral Sci 52:63-69, 2010
21. Blake FA, Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Heiland M: A new imaging modality for intraoperative evaluation of sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:183-185, 2008 (Pubitemid 351220983)
22. Heiland M, et al: Navigated implantation after microsurgical bone transfer using intraoperatively acquired cone-beam computed tomography data sets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:70-75, 2008 (Pubitemid 350216387)
23. Lopes N, Oliveira DM, Vajgel A, Pita I, Bezerra T, Vasconcellos RJ: A new approach for reconstruction of a severely atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2455-2459, 2009
24. Gapski R, et al: Histological, histomorphometric, and radiographic evaluation of a sinus augmentation with a new bone allograft: a clinical case report. Implant Dent 17:430-438, 2008
25. Hamada Y, et al: Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:128-137, 2005 (Pubitemid 40354545)
26. Oberoi S, Chigurupati R, Gill P, Hoffman WY, Vargervik K: Volumetric assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 46:503-511, 2009
27. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P: Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 106:721-764, 1998 (Pubitemid 128736235)
28. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S: Natural history of autografts and allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 225:7-16, 1987 (Pubitemid 18009305)
29. Chadwick JW, Lam EW: The effects of slice thickness and interslice interval on reconstructed cone beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110:e37-42, 2010
30. de Oliveira MG, Morais LE, Silva DN, de Oliveira HW, Heitz C, Gaiao L: Is 3D-CT reformation using free software applicable to diagnosis of bone changes in mandibular condyles? J Appl Oral Sci 17:166-169, 2009
31. Gibaud B: The quest for standards in medical imaging. Eur J Radiol, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.003
32. van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Berge SJ, et al: Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. Clin Oral Investig, 2010. doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8
33. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M: Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:106-114, 2008
34. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB: Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:219-226, 2006 (Pubitemid 44076876)
35. Yeni YN, Christopherson GT, Dong XN, Kim DG, Fyhrie DP: Effect of microcomputed tomography voxel size on the finite element model accuracy for human cancellous bone. J Biomech Eng 127:1-8, 2005 (Pubitemid 40463475)
36. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD: Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:323-335, 2010
37. Schlueter B, Kim KB, Oliver D, Sortiropoulos G: Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle. Angle Orthod 78:880-888, 2008
38. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Carey J: Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:400-408, 2010