Near-infrared light to aid peripheral intravenous cannulation in children: A cluster randomised clinical trial of three devices

Anaesthesia

Volumn 68, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 835-845

  De Graaff, J C ^a   Cuper, N J ^b   Mungra, R A A ^b   Vlaardingerbroek, K ^b   Numan, S C ^b   Kalkman, C J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFANT; INFRARED RADIATION; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; VASCULAR ACCESS; VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ANESTHESIA; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFRARED RAYS; MALE; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEINS;

EID: 84880132209     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12294     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Zempsky WT,. Optimizing the management of peripheral venous access pain in children: evidence, impact, and implementation. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (Suppl 3): S121-4.
2. Cuper NJ, de Graaff JC, van Dijk AT, Verdaasdonk RM, van der Werff DB, Kalkman CJ,. Predictive factors for difficult intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Pediatric Anesthesia 2011; 22: 223-9.
3. Perry AM, Caviness AC, Hsu DC,. Efficacy of a near-infrared light device in pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Emergency Care 2011; 27: 5-10.
4. Chapman LL, Sullivan B, Pacheco AL, Draleau CP, Becker BM,. VeinViewer-assisted intravenous catheter placement in a pediatric emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 2011; 18: 966-71.
5. Kim MJ, Park JM, Rhee N, et al. Efficacy of VeinViewer in pediatric peripheral intravenous access: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Pediatrics 2012; 171: 1121-5.
6. Kaddoum RN, Anghelescu DL, Parish ME, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the AccuVein AV300 device to standard insertion technique for intravenous cannulation of anesthetized children. Pediatric Anesthesia 2012; 22: 884-9.
7. Miyake RK, Zeman HD, Duarte FH, et al. Vein imaging: a new method of near infrared imaging, where a processed image is projected onto the skin for the enhancement of vein treatment. Dermatologic Surgery 2006; 32: 1031-8.
8. Mihara M, Hara H, Hayashi Y, et al. Upper-Limb lymphedema treated aesthetically with lymphaticovenous anastomosis using indocyanine green lymphography and noncontact vein visualization. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 2012; 28: 327-32.
9. Cuper NJ, Verdaasdonk RM, de Roode R, et al. Visualizing veins with near-infrared light to facilitate blood withdrawal in children. Clinical Pediatrics 2011; 50: 508-12.
10. Cuper NJ, Klaessens J, Jaspers J, et al. The use of near-infrared light for safe and effective visualization of subsurface blood vessels to facilitate blood withdrawal in children. Medical Engineering and Physics 2013; 35: 433-40.
11. Schellings R, Kessels AG, Sturmans F,. Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2008; 152: 2053-6.
12. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital and Health Statistics Series 2000; 11 (2002): 1-190.
13. Fitzpatrick TB,. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology 1988; 124: 869-71.
14. Diffey BL,. Solar ultraviolet radiation effects on biological systems. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1991; 36: 299-328.
15. Yen K, Riegert A, Gorelick MH,. Derivation of the DIVA score: a clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access. Pediatric Emergency Care 2008; 24: 143-7.
16. Phipps K, Modic A, O'Riordan MA, Walsh M,. A randomized trial of the Vein Viewer versus standard technique for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates. Journal of Perinatology 2012; 32: 498-501.
17. Peterson KA, Phillips AL, Truemper E, Agrawal S,. Does the use of an assistive device by nurses impact peripheral intravenous catheter insertion success in children? Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2012; 27: 134-43.
18. Riker MW, Kennedy C, Winfrey BS, Yen K, Dowd MD,. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Academic Emergency Medicine 2011; 18: 1129-34.
19. Cuper NJ, de Graaff JC, Verdaasdonk RM, Kalkman CJ,. Near-infrared imaging in intravenous cannulation in children: a cluster randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e191-7.
20. Chiao FB, Resta-Flarer F, Lesser J, et al. Vein visualization: patient characteristic factors and efficacy of a new infrared vein finder technology. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013; doi 10.1093/bja/aet003.
21. Simhi E, Kachko L, Bruckheimer E, Katz J,. A vein entry indicator device for facilitating peripheral intravenous cannulation in children: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2008; 107: 1531-5.
22. Ravishankar N, Elliot SC, Beardow Z, Mallick A,. A comparison of Rapydan® patch and Ametop® gel for venous cannulation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 367-70.
23. Black KJ, Pusic MV, Harmidy D, McGillivray D,. Pediatric intravenous insertion in the emergency department: bevel up or bevel down? Pediatric Emergency Care 2005; 21: 707-11.
24. Arendts G, Stevens M, Fry M,. Topical anaesthesia and intravenous cannulation success in paediatric patients: a randomized double-blind trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 100: 521-4.