Lower responsiveness of canopy evapotranspiration rate than of leaf stomatal conductance to open-air CO2 elevation in rice

Global Change Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2444-2453

  Shimono, Hiroyuki ^a   Nakamura, Hirofumi ^a   Hasegawa, Toshihiro ^b   Okada, Masumi ^a  

^a IWATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration; Canopy evapotranspiration rate; Crop coefficient; Free air CO2 enrichment; Rice; Simulation model; Stomatal conductance

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; WATER;

CANOPY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWING SEASON; LEAF AREA INDEX; MODELING; RICE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION; CANOPY EVAPOTRANSPIRATION RATE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CROP COEFFICIENT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FREE-AIR CO2 ENRICHMENT; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; RICE; SIMULATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TEMPERATURE;

ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION; CANOPY EVAPOTRANSPIRATION RATE; CROP COEFFICIENT; FREE-AIR CO2 ENRICHMENT; RICE; SIMULATION MODEL; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ORYZA SATIVA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

ORYZA SATIVA;

EID: 84880131752     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12214     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements - FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome.
2. 2 and nitrogen availability have interactive effects on canopy carbon gain in rice. New Phytologist, 161, 459-471.
3. 2 and temperature on rice: a summary of five growing seasons. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 48, 575-582.
4. Baker JT, Allen LH, Boote KJJ, Jones P, Jones JW (1990) Rice photosynthesis and evapotranspiration in subambient, ambient, and superambient carbon dioxide concentrations. Agronomy Journal, 82, 834-840.
5. Baker JT, Hartwell Allen L, Boote K, Pickering N (1997) Rice responses to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. 2. Photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Global Change Biology, 3, 129-138.
6. 2 and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 29, 2077-2090.
7. 2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiology, 143, 134-144.
8. Bunce JA (2000) Responses of stomatal conductance to light, humidity and temperature in winter wheat and barley grown at three concentrations of carbon dioxide in the field. Global Change Biology, 6, 371-382.
9. Bunce JA (2004) Carbon dioxide effects on stomatal responses to the environment and water use by crops under field conditions. Oecologia, 140, 1-10.
10. Chaudhuri UN, Kirkham MB, Kanemasu ET (1990) Carbon dioxide and water level effects on yield and water use of winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 82, 637-641.
11. 2 enrichment increases water-use efficiency in sorghum. New Phytologist, 151, 407-412.
12. FAO (2012) FAOSTAT. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (accessed 14 July 2012).
13. Hanyu J, Ono K (1960) Studies on the evapo-transpiration from the paddy field in the cooler regions (1). Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 16, 111-118.
14. 2 enrichment (FACE) and differential irrigation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 70, 189-207.
15. 2 and high temperature conditions as determined by remotely sensed canopy temperature. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 68, 137-145. (in Japanese with English abstract).
16. 2 enrichment and variable soil moisture regimes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 70, 247-258.
17. 2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on wheat evapotranspiration and water use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 104, 85-105.
18. IPCC (2007) Summary for Policy makers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen ZJ, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL), pp. 1-52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. 2 enrichment (FACE) experiment. Global Change Biology, 9, 826-837.
20. 2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat. Water Resources Research, 35, 1179-1190.
21. 2 enrichment. Advances in Agronomy, 77, 293-368.
22. Long PS, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR (2004) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 591-628.
23. Magliulo V, Bindi M, Rana G (2003) Water use of irrigated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) grown under free air carbon dioxide enrichment in central Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 97, 65-80.
24. Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM (2003) Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. Chapman & HALL/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
25. 3. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24, 327-336.
26. 2 injection: system description. New Phytologist, 150, 251-260.
27. Okada M, Nakamura H, Kim H-Y, Yoshimoto M (in press) Design and performance of a laser-gauging microlysimeter for measuring the water balance of paddy rice. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology.
28. Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science, 313, 1068-1072.
29. Sakuratani T, Horie T (1985) Studies on evapotranspiration from crops. (1) On seasonal changes, varietal differences and the simplified methods of estimate in evapotranspiration of paddy rice. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 41, 45-55.
30. Shiklomanov IA (1998) World Water Resources. A new Appraisal and Assessment for the 21st Century. UNESCO, Paris.
31. 2 concentration. Annals of Botany, 103, 87-94.
32. 2 is reduced in cool weather. Global Change Biology, 14, 276-284.
33. 2 relates to growth before heading, and not to maturity group. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 523-532.
34. 2 under fully open-air conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33, 322-331.
35. 3 results from the European CHIP-programme. European Journal of Agronomy, 17, 337-352.
36. Vu SH, Watanabe H, Takagi K (2005) Application of FAO-56 for evaluating evapotranspiration in simulation of pollutant runoff from paddy rice field in Japan. Agricultural Water Management, 76, 195-210.
37. 2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 2. Net assimilation and stomatal conductance of leaves. Photosynthesis Research, 66, 79-95.
38. 2 improved sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought. New Phytologist, 152, 231-248.
39. 2 on seasonal evapotranspiration from two agricultural species. Global Change Biology, 5, 903-917.
40. 2 concentration-interacting variables and perspectives of scale. New Phytologist, 153, 485-496.
41. 2 enrichment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 133, 226-246.
42. Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2004) Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agricultural Water Management, 69, 115-133.