Feedback significantly influences the simulated effect of CO2 on seasonal evapotranspiration from two agricultural species

Global Change Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 903-917

  Wilson, Kell B ^a,c   Carlson, Toby N ^a   Bunce, James A ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Conductance; Evapotranspiration; Maize; Simulation; Soybeans; Stomatal

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CORN; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; GAS EXCHANGE; SOYBEAN; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

EID: 0033399805     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00280.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions In Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. Biggens I), pp 221-224 Martinas Nijhoff, Netherlands.
2. Bunce JA, Wilson KB, Carlson TN (1997) The effect of doubled CO2 on water use by alfalfa and orchard grass, simulating evapotranspirationn using canopy conductance measurements. Global Change Biology, 3, 81-87
3. Capehart WJ, Carlson TN (1994) Estimating near-surface soil moisture availability using a meterologically driven soil-water profile. Journal of Hydrology, 160, 1-20.
4. Carlson TN, Belles JE, Gillies RR (1991) Transient water stress in a vegetation canopy Simulations and measurements Remote Sensing of the Environment, 35, 175-186
5. Cure J, Acock B (1986) Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling a literature survey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 38, 127-145
6. 2 assimilation in leaves of C3 plants. Planta, 149, 78-90
7. Fiedler BH, Moeng CH (1985) A practical integral closure model for mean vertical transport of a scalar in a convective boundary layer Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 42, 359-363
8. Field CB, Jackson RB, Mooney HA (1995) Stomatal responses to increased CO2 implications from the plant to global scale Plant, Cell and Environment, 18, 1214-1225.
9. 2 on vegetation-atmosphere interactions Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 73, 285-295.
10. Henderson-Sellers A, McGuffie K, Gross C (1995) Sensitivity of global climate model simulations to increased stomatal resistance and CO2 increases. Journal of Climate, 8, 1738-1756.
11. Jacobs CMJ, De Bruin HAR (1992) The sensitivity of regional transpiration to land-surface characteristics: Significance of feedback Journal of Climate, 5, 683-698.
12. Jacobs CMJ, De Bruin HAR (1997) Predicting regional transpiration at elevated atmospheric CO2 Influence of the PBL-vegetation interaction Journal of Applied Meteorology, 36, 1663-1675
13. Jara J, Stockle CO, Kjelgaard (1998) Measurement of evapotranspiration and its components in a corn (Zea Mays L.) field. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 92, 131-145
14. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 273, 593-610
15. Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 1-49
16. Kelliher FM, Leuning R, Raupach MR, Shulze E-D (1995) Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 73, 1-16.
17. Luo Y, Sims DA, Griffen KL (1998) Nonlinearity of photosynthetic responses to growth in rising atmospheric CO2: an experimental and modeling study. Global Change Biology, 4, 173-184.
18. Lynn BH, Carlson TN (1990) A stomatal resistance model illustrating plant vs. external control of transpiration Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 52, 5-43
19. McNaughton KG (1989) Regional interaction between canopies and the atmosphere. In Plant Canopies Their Growth Form and Function (eds Russell G, Marshall B, Jarvis PG), pp 63-81 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. McNaughton KG, Jarvis PG (1991) Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 54, 279-302
21. Morison JIL, Gifford RM (1984) Plant Growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11, 361-374
22. Olioso A, Carlson TN, Brisson (1996) Simulation of diurnal transpiration and photosynthesis of a water stressed soybean canopy Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 81, 41-59.
23. Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 193, 120-145.
24. Pollard D, Thompson SL (1995) Use of land-surface-transfer scheme (LSX) in a global climate model: the response to doubling stomatal resistance Global and Planetary Change, 10, 129-161
25. Raupach MR (1998) Influences of local feedbacks on land-air exchanges of energy and carbon. Global Change Biology, 4, 477-494
26. Schulze E-D, Kelliher FM, Korner C, Lloyd J, Leuning R (1994) Relationship among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition. a global ecology scaling exercise Annual Review of Ecology and Systemtics, 25, 629-660
27. 2 on climate. Science, 271, 1402-1406
28. Wilson KB, Bunce JA (1997) Effects of carbon dioxide concentration on the interactive effects of temperature and water vapour on stomatal conductance in soybeans Plant, Cell and Environment, 20, 230-238