Does use of a virtual environment change reaching while standing in patients with traumatic brain injury?

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Schafer, Amanda Y ^a   Ustinova, Ksenia I ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm postural coordination; Balance; Postural control; Rehabilitation; Virtual reality; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ATAXIA; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ONSET AGE; STANDING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; BRAIN INJURIES; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880086200     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-76     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Virtual reality environments to enhance upper limb functional recovery in patients with hemiparesis. Levin MF, Knaut LA, Magdalon EC, Subramanian S, Stud Health Technol Inform 2009 145 94 108 19592789
2. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 17 6 28
3. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Thornton M, Marshall S, McComas J, Finestone H, McCormick A, Sveistrup H, Brain Inj 2005 19 989 1000 10.1080/02699050500109944 16263641 (Pubitemid 41701020)
4. Video-capture virtual reality system for patients with paraplegic spinal cord injury. Kizony R, Raz L, Katz N, Weingarden H, Weiss PL, J Rehabil Res Dev 2005 42 595 608 10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0023 16586185
5. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. Bryanton C, Bossé J, Brien M, McLean J, McCormick A, Sveistrup H, Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2006 9 123 128 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.123 23792872
6. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P, Physical Therapy 2008 88 1196 1207 10.2522/ptj.20080062 18689607
7. Virtual reality for gait training: can it induce motor learning to enhance complex walking and reduce fall risk in patients with Parkinson's disease? Mirelman A, Maidan I, Herman T, Deutsch JE, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011 66 234 240 21106702
8. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JA, J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010 25 72 80 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181ccc8b4 20234226
9. Upper limb virtual rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: initial evaluation of the elements system. Mumford N, Duckworth J, Thomas PR, Shum D, Williams G, Wilson PH, Brain Inj 2010 24 780 791 10.3109/02699051003652807 20353283
10. The ataxic subgroup: a discrete outcome after traumatic brain injury. Mysiw WJ, Corrigan JD, Gribble MW, Brain Inj 1990 4 247 255 10.3109/ 02699059009026174 2390651 (Pubitemid 20328268)
11. Models of traumatic cerebellar injury. Potts MB, Adwanikar H, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Cerebellum 2009 8 211 221 10.1007/s12311-009-0114-8 19495901
12. Imbalance following traumatic brain injury in adults: causes and characteristics. Allison L, J Neurol Phys Ther 1993 23 13 18
13. Post-traumatic intention tremor-clinical features and CT findings. Iwadate Y, Saeki N, Namba H, Odaki M, Oka N, Yamaura A, Neurosurg Rev 1989 12 500 507 10.1007/BF01790695 2812421 (Pubitemid 19256765)
14. Neuropsychological functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Kersel DA, Marsh NV, Havill JH, Sleigh JW, Brain Injury 2001 15 283 296 11299130 (Pubitemid 32377298)
15. Visual perceptual deficiencies in the brain injury population: management from start to finish. Hulse P, Dudley L, Neuro Rehabilitation 2010 27 269 274 21098997
16. Scheiman M, Rouse M, Optometric management of Learning Related vision problems St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Elsevier 2 2006
17. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004 14 1 11
18. Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. Knaut LA, Subramanian SK, McFadyen BJ, Bourbonnais D, Levin MF, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 793 802 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.030 19406299
19. The effect of two types of virtual reality on voluntary center of pressure displacement. Lott A, Bisson E, Lajoie Y, McComas J, Sveistrup H, Cyberpsychol Behav 2003 6 477 485 10.1089/109493103769710505 14583123 (Pubitemid 37296562)
20. Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: potential for virtual rehabilitation. Ustinova KI, Perkins J, Szostakowski L, Tamkei LS, Leonard WA, Acta Psych 2010 133 180 190 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.006
21. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S, Journal of Gerontology 1990 45 192 197
22. Modification of the functional reach test: analysis of lateral and anterior functional reach in community-dwelling older people. Takahashi T, Ishida K, Yamamoto H, Takata J, Nishinaga M, Doi Y, Yamamoto H, Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006 42 167 173 10.1016/j.archger.2005.06.010 16125260 (Pubitemid 41797272)
23. Idiopathic cerebellar ataxia of late onset: natural history and MRI morphology. Klockgether T, Schroth G, Diener HC, Dichgans J, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1990 53 297 305 10.1136/jnnp.53.4.297 2341843 (Pubitemid 20152009)
24. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Gayton D, Physiother Can 1989 41 304 311 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304 (Pubitemid 20026286)
25. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL, Phys Ther 2004 84 906 918 15449976 (Pubitemid 39305006)
26. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S, Scand J Rehab Med 1975 7 13 31
27. Colarusso R, Hammill D, MotorFree visual perceptual test Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications, Inc 3 1996
28. Meyers JE, Meyers KR, Rey complex figure test and recognition trial: professional manual Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc 1995
29. A pointing task to improve reaching performance in older adults. Engler SA, Lilly KA, Perkins J, Ustinova KI, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995 90 217 225
30. Challenging stability limits in old and young individuals with a functional reaching task. Spreitzer L, Perkins J, Ustinova KI, Am J Rehab Medicine 2013 92 36 44 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d8f9
31. Validity of functional stability limits as a measure of balance in adults aged 23-73 years. Holbein-Jenny M, McDermott K, Shaw C, Demchak J, Ergonomics 2007 50 631 646 10.1080/00140130601154814 17454084 (Pubitemid 46534150)
32. Age-associated differences in sensori-motor function and balance in community dwelling women. Lord S, Ward J, Age Ageing 1994 23 452 460 10.1093/ageing/23.6.452 9231937 (Pubitemid 24345492)
33. Aging of the somatosensory system: a translational perspective. Shaffer S, Harrison A, Phys Ther 2007 87 193 207 10.2522/ptj.20060083 17244695 (Pubitemid 46214601)
34. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Basford JR, Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Brey RH, Walker A, Malec JF, Moessner AM, Brown AW, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 343 349 10.1053/apmr.2003.50034 12638101 (Pubitemid 36297732)
35. The beneficial effects of a functional task target on reaching and postural balance in patients with right cerebral vascular accidents. Chen HC, Lin KC, Chen CL, Wu CY, Motor Control 2008 12 122 135 18483447
36. Clinical tests of standing balance: performance of persons with multiple sclerosis. Frzovic D, Morris ME, Vowels L, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000 81 215 221 10668778 (Pubitemid 30080682)
37. Functional balance tests for children with traumatic brain injury: within-session reliability. Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Keren O, Meyer S, Pediatr Phys Ther 2008 20 254 258 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181820dd8 18703963
38. Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF, Exp Brain Res 2003 148 196 201 12520407 (Pubitemid 36057005)
39. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. Magdalon EC, Michaelsen SM, Quevedo AA, Levin MF, Acta Psychologica 2011 138 126 134 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.015 21684505
40. Methodology for the iterative evaluation of prototype head-mounted displays in virtual environments: visual acuity metrics. Fidopiastis CM, Furhman C, Meyer C, Rolland JP, Presence 2005 14 550 562 10.1162/105474605774918697 (Pubitemid 43550678)
41. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Wann JP, Rushton S, Mon-Williams M, Vision Research 1995 35 2731 2736 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00018-U 7483313
42. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual environments. Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB, Perception 2005 34 191 204 10.1068/p5144 15832569 (Pubitemid 40482629)
43. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments. Geuss MN, Stefanucci JK, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012 38 1242 1253 Published ahead 22409144
44. Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments. Subramanian SK, Levin MF, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 30 8 36
45. Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed. Bingham GP, Coats R, Mon-Williams M, Neurophyschologia 2007 45 288 294 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.011 (Pubitemid 44828779)
46. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Johnson SH, Trends Cogn Sci 2004 8 71 78 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002 15588811 (Pubitemid 38169478)
47. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Steffen T, Seney M, Phys Ther 2008 88 733 738 10.2522/ptj.20070214 18356292 (Pubitemid 351770181)
48. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E, Disabil Rehabil 2009 31 243 248 10.1080/09638280801927830 18608433
49. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Motor control and learning Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 3 1999
50. Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. Holden MK, Dettwiler A, Dyar T, Niemann G, Bizzi E, Stud Health Technol Inform 2001 81 192 198 11317738 (Pubitemid 33320062)
51. Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons. Trotter Y, Celebrini S, Nature 1999 398 239 242 10.1038/18444 10094046 (Pubitemid 29142858)
52. The effect of gaze angle and fixation distance on the responses of neurons in V1, V2, and V4. Rosenbluth D, Allman JM, Neuron 2002 33 143 149 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00559-1 11779487 (Pubitemid 34088186)
53. Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Levin CA, Haber RN, Perception and Psychophysics 1993 54 250 259 10.3758/BF03211761 8361840
54. Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-inscene information for the programming of prehension. Gardner PL, Mon-Williams M, Exp Brain Res 2001 136 379 385 10.1007/s002210000590 11243479 (Pubitemid 32641960)
55. Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Vaillancourt DE, Haibach PS, Newell KM, Exp Brain Res 2006 173 742 750 10.1007/s00221-006-0454-2 16604313 (Pubitemid 44289496)
56. The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15- and 40-recommendations. Turville KL, Psihogios JP, Ulmer TR, Mirka GA, Applied Ergonomics 1998 29 239 246 10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00048-3 9701537 (Pubitemid 28325370)
57. Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. Shieh KK, Lee DS, Applied Ergonomics 2007 38 601 608 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06. 008 17049333 (Pubitemid 46836649)
58. Visual responses on neck muscles reveal selective gating that prevents express saccades. Corneil BD, Olivier E, Munoz DP, Neuron 2004 42 831 841 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00267-3 15182721 (Pubitemid 38748795)
59. Effects of distance and gaze position on postural stability in young and old subjects. Kapoula Z, Lê TT, Exp Brain Res 2006 173 438 445 10.1007/s00221-006-0382-1 16525804 (Pubitemid 44222339)
60. Gaze and viewing angle influence visual stabilization of upright posture. Ustinova K, Perkins J, Brain Behav 2011 1 19 25 10.1002/brb3.10 22398978
61. Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence. Wismeijer DA, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ, Exp Brain Res 2008 184 61 70 17717656 (Pubitemid 350059792)