Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 682-688

  Velvart, Peter ^a   Hecker, Hanjo ^a   Tillinger, Gabriel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b NONE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGE; MOLAR; PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH APEX;

EID: 0035650917     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.118904     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposure of dental pulps in germ free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;20:340-9.
2. Möller AJR. Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human [thesis]. Götenborg, Sweden: Götenborg Akademiförlaget, University of Götenborg; 1966.
3. Nair PNR. Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions. J Endod 1987;13:29-39.
4. Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp and root canal therapy on certain factors: an analytic study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations. Acta Odontol Scand 1956;14(suppl 21):1-175.
5. Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504.
6. Pitt Ford TR. Surgical treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, editors. Essential endodontology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999. p. 278-80.
7. Carr GB. Ultrasonic root end preparation. Dent Clin North Am 1997;41:541-54.
8. Hirsch JM, Ahlstrom U, Henrikson PA, Heyden G, Peterson LE. Periapical surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1979;8:173-85.
9. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: part 1. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:137-41.
10. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Radiographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:152-7.
11. Bender IB: Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. J Endod 1997;23:5-14.
12. Kassebaum DK, Reaedr CM, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE. Localization of anatomic structures before endodontic surgery with tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:610-3.
13. Butterfield KJ, Dagenais M, Clokie C. Clinical accuracy and validity of linear tomography for presurgical dental implant analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:203-9.
14. Williams MY, Mealey BL, Hallman WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:373-80.
15. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1016-22.
16. Ekestubbe A. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning. Swed Dent J Suppl 1999;138:1-82.
17. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-32.
18. Trope M, Pettigrew J, Petras J, Barnett F, Tronstad L. Differentiation of radicular cysts and granulomas using computerized tomography. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989;5:69-72.
19. Nair PNR. New perspectives on radicular cysts: do they heal? Int Endod J 1998;31:155-60.
20. Linenberg WB, Waldron CA, Dehaune GF. A clinical roentgenographic study and histologic examination of periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:467-72.
21. Cotti E, Variu P, Dettori C, Mallarini G. Computerized tomography in the management and follow-up of extensive periapical lesion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:186-9.
22. Wuerhrman AH, Manson-hing LR. Dental radiology. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1981. p. 266-7.
23. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993;64:1243-9.
24. Ingle JI. Endodontics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 142-65.
25. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Lambrecht JT, Schneeberger P, Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;105:503-10.
26. Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Antonsen RG, Rueter FG, Slayton RJ, Suleiman OH. Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. Radiology 1992;184:135-40.
27. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:156-64.
28. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:40-2.
29. Bianchi J, Goggins W, Rudolph M. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computer tomography in dental implant radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:249-53.
30. Cohnen M, Cohnen B, Ewen K, Teubert G, Modder U. Dosage measurements in spiral CT examinations of the head and neck region. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998;168:474-9.
31. Hassfeld S, Streib S, Sahl H, Stratmann U, Fehrentz D, Zoller J. Low-dose computerized tomography of the jaw bone in pre-implantation diagnosis: limits of dose reduction and accuracy of distance measurements. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1998;2:188-93.
32. Diederichs CG, Engelke WG, Richter B, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography? Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1758-60.