My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 244-254

  Keyes, Helen ^a   Brady, Nuala ^a   Reilly, Richard B ^b   Foxe, John J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

EEG; Event related potentials; Face recognition; Self face

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SELF CONCEPT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CONCEPT; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75149169198     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society: Guideline 5. .
2. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez A., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (1996) 551-565
3. Bentin S., and Deouell L.Y. Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (2000) 35-54
4. Bentin S., Taylor M.J., Rousselet G.A., Itier R.J., Caldara R., Schyns P.G., et al. Much ado about nothing: Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance does not abolish N170 face sensitivity. Nature Neuroscience 10 (2007) 801-802
5. Brady N., Campbell M., and Flaherty M. My left brain and me: A dissociation in the perception of self and others. Neuropsychologia 42 9 (2004) 1156-1161
6. Brady N., Campbell M., and Flaherty M. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend. Brain and Cognition 58 (2005) 4-342
7. Caharel S., Courtay N., Bernard C., Lalonde R., and Rebai M. Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition 59 (2005) 96-100
8. Caharel S., Poiroux S., Bernard C., Thibaut F., Lalonde R., and Rebai M. ERPs associated with familiarity and degrees of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience 112 (2002) 1499-1512
9. Dapretto M., Davies M.S., Pfeifer J.H., Scott A.A., Sigman M., Bookheimer S.Y., et al. Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience 9 (2006) 28-30
10. Devue C., Collette F., Balteau E., Degueldre C., Luxen A., Maquet P., et al. Here I am: The cortical correlates of visual self-recognition. Brain Research 1143 (2007) 169-182
11. Eimer M. Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology 11 (2000) 694-705
12. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
13. Gillihan S.J., and Farah M.J. Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005) 76-97
14. Gobbini M.I., and Haxby J.V. Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 32-41
15. Guthrie D., and Buchwald J.S. Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology 28 (1991) 240-244
16. Haig A.R., Gordon E., and Hook S. To scale or not to scale: McCarthy and Wood revised. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 103 (1997) 323-325
17. Holmes A., Vuilleumier P., and Eimer M. The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 16 (2003) 174-184
18. Iacoboni M. Failure to deactivate in autism: The co-constitution of self and other. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 431-433
19. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage 15 (2002) 353-372
20. Ito T.A., and Urland G.R. The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5 1 (2005) 21-36
21. Jacques C., and Rossion B. The speed of individual face categorization. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 485-492
22. Jacques C., and Rossion B. Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans. NeuroImage 36 (2008) 863-876
23. Jeffreys D.A. A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Experimental Brain Research 78 (1989) 193-202
24. Joyce C., and Rossion B. The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology 116 (2005) 2613-2631
25. Keenan J.P., Wheeler M., Platek S.M., Lardi G., and Lassonde M. Self-face processing in a callosotomy patient. European Journal of Neuroscience 18 (2003) 2391-2395
26. Kihlstrom J.F., Beer J.S., and Klein S.B. Self & identity as memory. In: Leary M.R., and Tangney J. (Eds). Handbook of self and identity (2002), Guilford Press, New York 68-90
27. Kircher T.T.J., Senior C., Phillips M.L., Rabe-Hesketh S., Benson P.J., Bullmore E.T., et al. Recognizing one's own face. Cognition 78 (2001) B1-B15
28. Lieberman M.D. Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007) 259-289
29. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2005), MIT Press
30. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 62 (1985) 203-208
31. Milivojevic B., Clapp W.C., Johnson B.W., and Corballis M.C. Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 967-978
32. Ninomiya H., Onitsuka T., Chen C.H., Sato E., and Tashiro N. P300 in response to the subject's own face. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 52 (1998) 519-522
33. Northoff G., Heinzel A., deGreck M., Bermpohl F., Dobrowolny H., and Panksepp J. Self-referential processing in our brain - A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 440-457
34. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
35. Platek S.M., Loughead J.W., Gur R.C., Busch S., Ruparel K., Phend N., et al. Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces. Human Brain Mapping 27 (2006) 91-98
36. Rossion B., Campanella S., Gomez C.M., Delinte A., et al. Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar & unfamiliar face processing: An ERP study. Clinical Neurophysiology (1999) 449-462
37. Rossion B., Curran T., and Gauthier I. A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition 85 (2002) 189-196
38. Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Despland P., Linotte S., Bruyer R., et al. The N170 occipito-temporal component is enhanced and delayed to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 1-6
39. Rossion B., and Jacques C. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 1959-1979
40. Ruchkin D.S., Johnson R., and Friedman Jr. D. Scaling is necessary when making comparisons between shapes of event-related potential topographies: A reply to Haig et al. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 832-834
41. Sugiura M., Kawashima R., Nakamura K., Okada K., Kato T., Nakamura A., et al. Passive and active recognition of one's own face. NeuroImage 11 1 (2000) 36-48
42. Sugiura M., Watanabe J., Maeda Y., Matsue Y., Fukuda H., and Kawashina R.M. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 143-149
43. Sui J., Zhu Y., and Han S. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport 17 4 (2006) 423-427
44. Tanaka J.W., and Curran T. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 43-47
45. Tanaka J.W., Curran T., Porterfield A.L., and Collins D. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 1488-1497
46. Thierry G., Martin C.D., Downing P., and Pegna A.J. Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity. Nature Neuroscience 10 (2007) 505-511
47. Thorpe S., Fize D., and Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996) 520-522
48. Tong F., and Nakayama K. Robust representations for face: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1016-1035
49. Troje N.F., and Kersten D. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception 28 (1999) 483-487
50. Turk D.J., Heatherton T.E., Kelley W.M., Funnell M.G., Gazzaniga M.S., and Macrea C.N. Mike or me? Self-recognition in a split brain patient. Nature Neuroscience 5 9 (2002) 841-842
51. Uddin L.Q., Kaplan J.T., Molnar-Szakacs I., Zaidel E., and Iacoboni M. Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal "mirror" network in the right hemisphere: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 25 (2005) 926-935
52. Uddin L.Q., Rayman J., and Zaidel E. Split-brain reveals separate but equal self-recognition in the two cerebral hemispheres. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2005) 633-640
53. Urbach T.P., and Kutas M. The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 791-808
54. Wilding E.L. The practice of rescaling scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 72 (2006) 325-332