Representation of contextually related multiple objects in the human ventral visual pathway

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1261-1269

  Song, Yiying ^a   Luo, Yu L L ^a   Li, Xueting ^a   Xu, Miao ^a   Liu, Jia ^a,b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FACE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; BLOOD; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULARIZATION; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

OXYGEN;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879974218     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00406     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrews, T. J., Davies-Thompson, J., Kingstone, A., & Young, A. W. (2010). Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3544-3552.
2. Auckland, M. E., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2007). Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 332-337.
3. Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012). Holistic person processing: Faces with bodies tell the whole story. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 20-37.
4. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
5. Bar, M., & Ullman, S. (1996). Spatial context in recognition. Perception, 25, 343-352.
6. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.
7. Brandman, T., & Yovel, G. (2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10534-10540.
8. Chaigneau, S. E., Barsalou, L. W., & Zamani, M. (2009). Situational information contributes to object categorization and inference. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 130, 81-94.
9. Chan, A. W., Kravitz, D. J., Truong, S., Arizpe, J., & Baker, C. I. (2010). Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 417-418.
10. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
11. Cox, D., Meyers, E., & Sinha, P. (2004). Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science, 304, 115-117.
12. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage, 9, 179-194.
13. Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393-401.
14. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
15. DiCarlo, J. J., & Cox, D. D. (2007). Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 333-341.
16. Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
17. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
18. Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., & Dale, A. M. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage, 9, 195-207.
19. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495-504.
20. Ghuman, A. S., McDaniel, J. R., & Martin, A. (2010). Face adaptation without a face. Current Biology, 20, 32-36.
21. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Avidan, G., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187-203.
22. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 649-67.
23. Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 371-388.
24. Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430.
25. Hollingworth, A. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition, 17, 273-291.
26. Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2009). The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: Electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision, 9, 8.1-8.16.
27. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
28. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science, 282, 108-111.
29. Kravitz, D. J., Kriegeskorte, N., & Baker, C. I. (2010). High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2916-2925.
30. Liu, J., Harris, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2010). Perception of face parts and face configurations: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 203-211.
31. MacEvoy, S. P., & Epstein, R. A. (2009). Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Current Biology, 19, 943-947.
32. MacEvoy, S. P., & Epstein, R. A. (2011). Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1323-1329.
33. Malach, R., Levy, I., & Hasson, U. (2002). The topography of high-order human object areas. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 176-184.
34. Miller, E. K., Gochin, P. M., & Gross, C. G. (1993). Suppression of visual responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus. Brain Research, 616, 25-29.
35. Morris, J. P., Pelphrey, K. A., & McCarthy, G. (2006). Occipitotemporal activation evoked by the perception of human bodies is modulated by the presence or absence of the face. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1919-1927.
36. Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2005). Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 603-608.
37. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 246-253.
38. Reddy, L., & Kanwisher, N. (2007). Category selectivity in the ventral visual pathway confers robustness to clutter and diverted attention. Current Biology, 17, 2067-2072.
39. Reddy, L., Kanwisher, N. G., & VanRullen, R. (2009). Attention and biased competition in multi-voxel object representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 106, 21447-21452.
40. Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736-1753.
41. Rolls, E. T., & Tovee, M. J. (1995). The responses of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the macaque when more than one stimulus is present in the receptive field. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 409-420.
42. Schiltz, C., Dricot, L., Goebel, R., & Rossion, B. (2010). Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision, 10, 25.1-25.16.
43. Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage, 32, 1385-1394.
44. Song, Y., Bu, Y., Hu, S., Luo, Y., & Liu, J. (2010). Short-term language experience shapes the plasticity of the visual word form area. Brain Research, 1316, 83-91.
45. Song, Y., Bu, Y., & Liu, J. (2010). General associative learning shapes the plasticity of the visual word form area. NeuroReport, 21, 333-337.
46. Song, Y., Hu, S., Li, X., Li, W., & Liu, J. (2010). The role of top-down task context in learning to perceive objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 9869-9876.
47. Song, Y., Tian, M., & Liu, J. (2012). Top-down processing of symbolic meanings modulates the visual word form area. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 12277-12283.
48. Spiridon, M., Fischl, B., & Kanwisher, N. (2006). Location and spatial profile of category-specific regions in human extrastriate cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 77-89.
49. Taylor, J. C., Wiggett, A. J., & Downing, P. E. (2007). Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 1626-1633.
50. Zhang, J., Li, X., Song, Y., & Liu, J. (2012). The fusiform face area is engaged in holistic, not parts-based, representation of faces. PLoS One, 7, e40390.
51. Zoccolan, D., Cox, D. D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). Multiple object response normalization in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8150-8164.