Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 332-337

  Auckland, Mark E ^a   Cave, Kyle R ^b   Donnelly, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547494885     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194073     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. AUCKLAND, M. E. (2005). The influence of visual context on object recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton.
2. BAR, M. (2004). Visual objects in context Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
3. BIEDERMAN, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 213-263) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. BOYCE, S. J., & POLLATSEK, A (1992). Identification of objects in scenes: The role of scene background in object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 531-543.
5. HUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
6. AVENPORT, J. L., & POTTER, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
7. FRIEDMAN, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
8. HENDERSON, J. M., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception A Performance, 13, 449-463.
9. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 398-115.
10. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1999). Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint Evidence from object type and token discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 102, 319-343.
11. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement In J. [B.] Long and A [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. ÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception A Performance, 15, 315-330.
14. PALMER, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526.
15. TURATTO, M., BENSO, F., FACOETTI, A., GALFANO, G., MASCETTI, G. G., & UMILTÀ, C. (2000). Automatic and voluntary focusing of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 935-952.