The effect of delayed-JOLs and sentence generation on children's monitoring accuracy and regulation of idiom study

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 173-191

  van Loon, Mariëtte H ^a   de Bruin, Anique B H ^a   van Gog, Tamara ^b   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Idioms; Judgment of learning; Monitoring; Reaction times; Regulation; Sentence generation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879965122     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-013-9100-0     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110-118.
2. Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1015-1021.
3. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
4. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 610-632.
5. Bobrow, A., & Bell, M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343-346.
6. Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont: Wadsworth.
7. Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & Mackey, T. A. (1985). Elementary school age children's comprehension of specific idiomatic expressions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 245-257.
8. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
9. Cain, K., & Towse, A. S. (2008). To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1538-1549.
10. Cain, K., Towse, A. S., & Knight, R. S. (2009). The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 280-298.
11. Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354-373.
12. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (1997). That's the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition, 25, 57-71.
14. De Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294-310.
15. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274-296.
16. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
17. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1-24.
19. Fisher, R. A. (1915). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507-521.
20. Fletcher, C. R., & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175-190.
21. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
22. Graf, P. (1982). The memorial consequences of generation and transformation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 539-548.
23. Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001-1013.
24. Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 4, 161-176.
25. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
26. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
27. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D. M., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133-159.
28. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
29. Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The easily learned, easily remembered heuristic in children. Cognitive Development, 24, 169-182.
30. Koriat, A., & Ma'ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478-492.
31. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P. J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 1-17). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 325-340.
33. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children's metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 75-90.
34. Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
35. Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children's comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 19, 415-433.
36. Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51-66.
37. Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B., & Cacciari, C. (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study. Brain and Language, 91, 303-314.
38. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers' recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152-166.
39. Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959-964.
40. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008a). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174-179.
41. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008b). Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1084-1097.
42. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
43. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Delayed-JOL effect". Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
44. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-171). New York: Academic Press.
45. Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: a comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 384-391.
46. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.
47. Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131-148.
48. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
49. Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T. O. (2000). Developmental trends in children's memory monitoring: evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115-134.
50. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116-1129.
51. Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161-184.
52. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
53. Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.
54. Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37, 529-540.
55. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160.
56. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
57. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
58. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267-1280.
59. van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351.
60. van Loon, M. H., De Bruin, A. B. H., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15-25.
61. Von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Roebers, C. (2011). The effects of summary production and encoding condition on children's metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 6, 3-23.
62. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.