The effects of summary production and encoding condition on children's metacognitive monitoring

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-23

  von der Linden, Nicole ^a   Schneider, Wolfgang ^a   Roebers, Claudia M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Children; Confidence judgments; Judgments of learning; Metacognition; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955063678     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-010-9063-3     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110-118.
2. Benjamin, A. S., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309-338). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
3. Bjorklund, D. F., Gaultney, J. F., & Green, B. L. (1993). "I watch therefore I can do:" The development of meta-imitation over the preschool years and the advantage of optimism in one's imitative skills. In R. Pasnak & M. L. Howe (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development, Vol. II: Competencies (pp. 79-102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
5. Butterfield, E. C., Nelson, T. O., & Peck, V. (1988). Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing. Developmental Psychology, 24, 654-663.
6. Cassel, W. S., Roebers, C. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1996). Developmental patterns of eyewitness responses to repeated and increasingly suggestive questions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 116-133.
7. Cohors-Fresenbort, E., Kramer, S., Pundsack, F., Sjuts, J., & Sommer, N. (2010). The role of metacognitive monitoring in explaining differences in mathematics achievement. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 231-244.
8. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274-296.
9. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension. A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
10. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 374-380.
11. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 551-565.
12. Elischberger, H. B., & Roebers, C. M. (2001). Improving young children's free narratives about an observed event: the effects of nonspecific verbal prompts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 160-166.
13. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
14. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
15. Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., & Goodwin, D. (1986). A componential analysis of the effects of derived and supplied strategy-utility information on children's strategy selections. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 76-92.
16. Hacker, D. G., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170.
17. Howie, P., & Roebers, C. M. (2007). Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall: new insights provided by a calibration perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 871-893.
18. Keleman, W. L. (2000). Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: judging what you know and what you will know. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 800-810.
19. Kimbal, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory and Cognition, 31, 918-929.
20. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
21. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
22. Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The memorizing-effort heuristic in judgments of memory: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265-279.
23. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparism of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1133-1145.
24. Koriat, A., & Ma'ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478-492.
25. Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., Sheffer, L., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Exploring mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 595-608.
26. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 1-18). Boston: Kluwer.
27. Kunzinger, E. L., III. (1985). A short-term longitudinal study of memorial development during early grade school years. Developmental Psychology, 21, 642-646.
28. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2008). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers' recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152-166.
29. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., Hartwig, M. K., Rawson, K. A., Swan, K., & Cook, D. (2009). Using standards to improve middle school studentś accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 307-318.
30. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2003). Metakognitive Überwachungs- und Selbstkontrollprozesse bei der Lernzeiteinteilung von Kindern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 173-183 [German].
31. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2004). The effects of incentives and instructions on children's allocation of study time. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 153-169.
32. Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: delayed vs. immediate predictions and tests. Memory and Cognition, 26, 959-964.
33. Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
34. McGivern, J. E., Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). A developmental study of memory monitoring and strategy selection. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 103-115.
35. Metcalfe, J., & Cornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463-477.
36. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
37. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1992). How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of-learning effect? Psychological Science, 3, 317-318.
38. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125-141). New York: Academic.
39. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: MIT.
40. Nietfield, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159-179.
41. Peterson, C., & Whalen, N. (2001). Five years later: children's memory for medical emergencies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 116-128.
42. Plummert, J. M., & Schwebel, D. C. (1997). Social and temperamental influences on children's overestimation of their physical abilities: links to accidental injuries. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 317-337.
43. Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1989). Metacognitive benefits of taking a test for children and young adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 430-450.
44. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., Ghatala, E. S., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Test monitoring in young grade school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 96-111.
45. Roebers, C. M. (2002). Confidence judgments in children's and adults' event recall and suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1052-1067.
46. Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 352-371.
47. Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Howie, P. (2007). Children's metamemorial judgments during an event recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 117-137.
48. Saywitz, K. J., & Geiselman, R. E. (1998). Interviewing the child witness: Maximizing completeness and minimizing error. In S. J. Lynn & K. M. McConkey (Eds.), Truth in memory (pp. 190-223). New York: Guilford.
49. Schneider, S. L., & Laurion, S. K. (1993). Do we know what we've learned from listening to the news? Memory and Cognition, 21, 198-209.
50. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & B. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metacognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
51. Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T. O. (2000). Developmental trends in children's memory monitoring: evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115-134.
52. Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1992). Memory monitoring accuracy as influenced by the distribution of retrieval practice. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 125-128.
53. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. (2007). The adaptive nature of children's overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development, 22, 197-212.
54. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
55. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160.
56. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
57. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267-1280.
58. Vesonder, G. T., & Voss, J. F. (1985). On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 363-376.
59. von der Linden, N., & Roebers, C. M. (2007). Developmental changes in uncertainty monitoring during an event recall task. Metacognition & Learning, 1, 213-226.