A systematic review of substance misuse assessment packages

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 347-355

  Sweetman, Jennifer ^a   Raistrick, Duncan ^a   Mdege, Noreen D ^b   Crosby, Helen ^a  

^a Leeds Addiction Unit   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Assessment; Dependence; Illicit drug; Substance misuse

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ILLICIT DRUG;

ADDICTION; ASSESSMENT; DEPENDENT PERSONALITY DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE MISUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALCOHOL; ASSESSMENT; DEPENDENCE; ILLICIT DRUG; SUBSTANCE MISUSE;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84879890663     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12039     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Davidhizar R, Bechtel G, Giger JN. A model to enhance culturally competent care. Hosp Top 1998;76:22-26.
2. Dingman C, Hegedus PD, Likes C, McDowell P, McCarthy E, Zwilling C. A coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to caring for the patient with head and neck cancer. J Support Oncol 2008;6:125-131.
3. Swann J. The importance of assessment in residential care. Nurs Residential Care 2004;6:387-389.
4. Turnbull GB. The Ostomy Assessment Inventory: a data-gathering process to enhance pouching system selection. Ostomy Wound Manage 1998;44:28-37.
5. Samet S, Waxman R, Hatzenbuehler M, Hasin D. Assessing addiction: concepts and instruments. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2007;4:19-30.
6. Raistrick D, Heather N, Godfrey C. Review of the effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, 2006.
7. Rieckmann T, Fuller BE, Saedi GA, McCarty D. Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2010;5:4.
8. Shamblen SR, Dwivedi P. Is some data better than no data at all? Evaluating the utility of secondary needs assessment data. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2010;17:835-852.
9. Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics 2010;28:113-142.
10. Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. London: The Stationery Office, 2008.
11. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (Sweden). The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs' priority issues. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 2011.
12. National Health Priority Action Council. National chronic disease strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
13. Edwards G, Arif A, Hodgson R. Nomenclature and classification of drugs- and alcohol-related problems: a WHO Memorandum. Bull World Health Organ 1981;59:225-242.
14. Edwards G, Gross MM, Keller M, Moser J, Room R. Alcohol-related disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1977.
15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, etal. The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100.
17. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
18. Butler SF, Budman SH, Goldman RJ, etal. Initial validation of a computer-administered addiction severity index: the ASI-MV. Psychol Addict Behav 2001;15:4-12.
19. Butler SF, Redondo JP, Fernandez KC, Villapiano A. Validation of the Spanish addiction severity index multimedia version. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009;99:18-27.
20. Liang T, Liu E-W, Zhong H, Wang B, Shen L-M, Wu Z-L. Reliability and validity of addiction severity index in drug users with methadone maintenance treatment in Guizhou Province, China. Biomed Environ Sci 2008;21:308-313.
21. Daeppen J-B, Burnand B, Schnyder C, Bonjour M, Pécoud A, Yersin B. Validation of the addiction severity index in French-speaking alcoholic patients. J Stud Alcohol 1996;57:585-590.
22. Krenz S, Dieckmann S, Favrat B, etal. French version of the Addiction Severity Index (5th edition): validity and reliability among Swiss opiate-dependent patients. Eur Addict Res 2004;10:173-179.
23. Luo W, Wu Z, Wei X. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the addiction severity index. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010;53 (Suppl 1):S121-S125.
24. Zanis DA, McLellan AT, Cnaan RA, Randall M. Reliability and validity of the addiction severity index with a homeless sample. J Subst Abuse Treat 1994;11:541-548.
25. McGovern MP, Morrison DH. The Chemical Use, Abuse, and Dependence Scale (CUAD): rationale, reliability, and validity. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992;9:27-38.
26. Westerberg VS, Tonigan JS, Miller WR. Reliability of Form 90D: an instrument for quantifying drug use. Subst Abus 1998;19:179-189.
27. Marsden J, Gossop M, Stewart D, etal. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. Addiction 1998;93:1857-1868.
28. Smith GR, Burnam MA, Mosley CL, Hollenberg JA, Mancino M, Grimes W. Reliability and validity of the substance abuse outcomes module. Psychiatr Serv 2006;57:1452-1460.
29. Alterman AI, Brown LS, Zaballero A, McKay JR. Interviewer severity ratings and composite scores of the ASI: a further look. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994;34:201-209.
30. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O'Brien CP. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980;168:26-33.
31. Westermeyer J, Crosby R, Nugent S. The Minnesota Substance Abuse Problems Scale: psychometric analysis and validation in a clinical population. Am J Addict 1998;7:24-34.
32. Haraguchi A, Ogai Y, Senoo E, etal. Verification of the Addiction Severity Index Japanese Version (ASI-J) as a treatment-customization, prediction and comparison tool for alcohol-dependent individuals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:2205-2225.
33. Alterman AI, McDermott PA, Cook TG, etal. Generalizability of the clinical dimensions of the Addiction Severity Index to nonopioid-dependent patients. Psychol Addict Behav 2000;14:287-294.
34. Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD. Concurrent validity of the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1983;171:606-610.
35. Alterman AI, McDermott PA, Cook TG, etal. New scales to assess change in the Addiction Severity Index for opioid, cocaine, and alcohol dependent. Psychol Addict Behav 1998;12:233-246.
36. Romelsjo A. The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and the severity of dependence: how large are the associations? J Subst Use 2004;9:127-131.
37. Schippers GM, Broekman TG, Buchholz A, Koeter MWJ, van den Brink W. Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): an instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications. Addiction 2009;105:862-871.
38. DeJong CAJ, Willems JCEW, Schippers GM, Hendriks VM. The Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in a Dutch alcoholic population. Int J Addict 1995;30:605-616.
39. Gerevich J, Bácskai E, Kó J, Rózsa S. Reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the European Addiction Severity Index. Psychopathology 2005;38:301-309.
40. Leonhard C, Mulvey K, Gastfriend DR, Shwartz M. The Addiction Severity Index: a field study of internal consistency and validity. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000;18:129-135.
41. Rosen CS, Henson BR, Finney JW, Moos RH. Consistency of self-administered and interview-based Addiction Severity Index composite scores. Addiction 2000;95:419-425.
42. Brodey BB, Rosen CS, Brodey IS, Sheetz BM, Steinfeld RR, Gastfriend DR. Validation of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) for Internet and automated telephone self-report administration. J Subst Abuse Treat 2004;26:253-259.