Reliability and validity of the substance abuse outcomes module

Psychiatric Services

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1452-1460

  Smith, G Richard ^a   Burnam, M Audrey ^c   Mosley, Cynthia L ^a   Hollenberg, Jan A ^a   Mancino, Mike ^a,b   Grimes, Wen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; METHADONE; OPIATE; PHENCYCLIDINE; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT; SEDATIVE AGENT;

ADDICTION; ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INHALANT ABUSE; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDITY;

EID: 33750538233     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1452     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mark TL, Coffey RM, McKusick DR, et al: National Estimates of Expenditures for Mental Health Services and Substance Abuse Treatment, 1991-2001. Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005
2. The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992-2002. Washington, DC, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004
3. National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2003. Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003
4. Hubbard RL, Marsden ML, Rachal JV, et al: Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1989
5. Flynn PM, Kristiansen PL, Porto JV, et al: Costs and benefits of treatment for cocaine addiction in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 57:167-174, 1999
6. Project MATCH Research Group: Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58:7-29, 1997
7. Moos RH, Finney J, Cannon D, et al: Outcomes Monitoring for Substance Abuse Patients: I. Patients' Characteristics and Treatment at Baseline. Palo Alto, Calif, Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Evaluation and Resource Center and Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Care Evaluation, 1998
8. Treatment Outcomes and Performance Pilot Studies (TOPPS). Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1999
9. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al: An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 168:26-33, 1980
10. Jarvis RM, O'Sullivan PS, McClain T, et al: Can one portfolio measure the six ACGME general competencies? Academic Psychiatry 28:190-196, 2004
11. Davis GC: General and psychiatry-specific patient care core competencies, in Core Competencies for Psychiatric Practice: What Clinicians Need to Know. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003
12. Peterson ED: Should we link payment to quality? American Heart Journal 148(suppl 5):S56-S58, 2004
13. Smith GR Jr, Ross RL, Rost KM: Psychiatric Outcomes Module: Depression (DOM), in Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. Edited by Sederer LI, Dickey B. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1996
14. Smith GR Jr, Babor T, Burnam MA, et al: Alcohol Outcomes Module. little Rock, Ark, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, 1994
15. Fischer EP: Mental Health Outcome Module Development and Testing: Development and initial validation of the Schizophrenia Outcomes Module: Final Report. Service Directed Research Grant 91.005. Fischer, EPI-55. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1993
16. Rost K, Smith GR Jr, Katon W, et al: Panic Outcomes Module: User's Manual. Little Rock, Ark, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, 1994
17. Robbins JM, Taylor JL, Burns BJ, et al: Adolescent Treatment Outcomes Module (ATOM): User's Manual. Little Rock, Ark, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, 1997
18. Smith GR Jr, Babor T, Burnam MA, et al: Substance Abuse Outcomes Module: User's Manual. Little Rock, Ark, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, 1996
19. Smith GR, Rost K, Fischer E, et al: Assessing the effectiveness of mental health care in routine clinical practice, in Outcomes Measurement in the Human Services: Cross-Cutting Issues and Methods. Edited by Mullen EJ, Magnabosco JL. Frederick, Md, National Association of Social Workers Press, 1997
20. Smith GR Jr, Ross RL, Rost KM: Psychiatric Outcomes Module: Substance Abuse Outcomes Module (SAOM), in Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. Edited by Sederer LI, Dickey B. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1996
21. Kessner DM, Kalk CE, Singer J: Assessing health quality: the case for tracers. New England Journal of Medicine 288:189-194, 1973
22. Typology Questionnaire. Hartford, Conn, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 1987
23. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, et al: National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 38:381-389, 1981
24. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, et al: Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption: II. Addiction 88:791-804, 1993
25. Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longabaugh R: The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An Instrument for Assessing Adverse Consequences of Alcohol Abuse. Test Manual. Project MATCH Monograph Series: Vol 4. Rockville, Md, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1994
26. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30:473-483, 1992
27. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr, Greenfield S, et al: The Medical Outcomes Study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262:925-930, 1989
28. Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 1990. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 10: Data From the National Health Survey. Hyattsville, Md, Department of Health and Human Services, 1991
29. Schwamm LH, Van Dyke C, Kiernan RJ, et al: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: comparison with the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination in a neurosurgical population. Annals of Internal Medicine 107:486-491, 1987
30. Cottler LB, Robins LN, Helzer JE: The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. British Journal of Addiction 84:801-814, 1989
31. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al: The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 9:199-213, 1992
32. Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J, et al: AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992
33. Reinert DF, Allen JP: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): a review of recent research. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 26:272-279, 2002
34. Robins L, Marcus L, Reich W, et al: NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version IV (DIS-IV): Interview and Specifications. St Louis, Mo, Washington University, Department of Psychiatry, 1996
35. Sobell LC, Sobell MB: Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption, in Measuring Alcohol Consumption. Edited by Litten R, Allen J. Totowa, NJ, Humana, 1992
36. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL: The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine 32:705-714, 1991
37. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1988
38. Cohen J: A coefficient for agreement of nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37-46, 1960
39. Cohen J: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70:213-220, 1960