Corrigendum to: Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): an instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications (Addiction, (2010), 105, (862-871), 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02889.x);Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): An instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications

Addiction

Volumn 105, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 862-871

  Schippers, Gerard M ^a   Broekman, Theo G ^b   Buchholz, Angela ^c   Koeter, Maarten W J ^a   Van Den Brink, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Bureau Beta   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Needs assessment; Outcome evaluation; Patient characteristics; Referral; Triage

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABILITY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MULTICENTER STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STANDARD; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TRIAGE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 77950670204     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.13532     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: a Research-based Guide, NIH publication no. 00-4180. Rockville, MD: NIDA. 1999. Available at: http://www.nida.nih.gov/podat/PODATIndex.html (accessed 18 December 2009).
2. Miller W. R., Wilbourne P. L. Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction 2002 97 : 265 277.
3. Berglund M., Thelander S., Jonsson E. Treating Alcohol and Drug Abuse. An Evidence-Based Review.
4. Merkx M. J. M., Schippers G. M., Koeter M. J. W., Vuijk P. J., Oudejans S., DeVries C. C. Q. et al. Allocation of substance use disorder patients to appropriate levels of care: feasibility of matching guidelines in routine practice in Dutch treatment centres. Addiction 2007 102 : 466 474.
5. McLellan A. T., Kushner H., Metzger D., Peters R., Smith I., Grissom G. et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992 9 : 199 213.
6. Kokkevi A., Hartgers C. EuropASI: European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. Eur Addict Res 1995 1 : 208 210.
7. Mäkelä K. Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addiction 2004 99 : 398 410.
8. Broekman T. G., Schippers G. M., Koeter M. J. W., van den Brink W. Standardized assessment in substance abuse treatment in the Netherlands: the case of the Addiction Severity Index and new developments. J Subst Use 2004 9 : 147 155.
9. Marsden J., Nizzoli U., Corbelli C., Margaron H., Torres M., Prada De Castro I. et al. New European instruments for treatment outcome research: reliability of the Maudsley addiction profile and treatment perceptions questionnaire in Italy, Spain and Portugal. Eur Addict Res 2000 6 : 115 122.
10. McLellan T. A., Cacciola J. C., Alterman A. I., Rikoon S. H., Carise D. The Addiction Severity Index at 25: origins, contributions and transitions. Am J Addict 2006 15 : 113 124.
11. Marsden J., Gossop M., Stewart D., Best D., Farrell M., Lehmann P. et al. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. Addiction 1998 93 : 1857 1867.
12. Darke S., Hall W., Heather N., Wodak A., Ward J. Development and validation of a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing outcome of treatment among opiate users: the opiate treatment index. Br J Addict 1992 87 : 733 742.
13. Lawrinson P., Copeland J., Indig D. Development and validation of a brief instrument for routine outcome monitoring in opioid maintenance pharmacotherapy services: the brief treatment outcome measure (BTOM). Drug Alcohol Depend 2005 80 : 125 133.
14. Dennis M. L., White M., Titus J. C., Unsicker J. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems 2007. Available at: http://www.chestnut.org/li/gain (accessed 18 December 2009).
15. Carey K. B. Clinically useful assessments: substance use and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Behav Res Ther 2002 40 : 1345 1361.
16. Carroll K. M., Rounsaville B. J. On beyond urine: clinically useful assessment instruments in the treatment of drug dependence. Behav Res Ther 2002 40 : 1329 1344.
17. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, vols 1-3, 10th edn.
18. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
19. World Health Organization. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) WHOQOL Study Protocol. WHO (MNH7PSF/93.9). 1993. Available at : http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/index.html (accessed 18 December 2009).
20. Stucki G., Cieza A., Ewert T., Kostanjsek N., Chatterjee S., Ustün T. B. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehab 2002 24 : 281 282.
21. Rauch A., Cieza A., Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2008 44 : 329 342.
22. Schippers G. M., Broekman T. G. Development of an Instrument Assessing Patient Characteristics in Substance Abuse Treatment Final report. ZonMw/Resultaten Scoren-project no. 31000068. Nijmegen: Amsterdam, AIAR, AMC-Amsterdam & Bureau Beta 2007. Available at: http://www.mateinfo.eu/pubs (accessed 18 December 2009).
23. Schippers G. M., Broekman T. G., Buchholz A. MATE 2.0 Handleiding & Protocol. Handleiding en protocol voor afname, scoring en gebruik van de MATE. [MATE 2.0 Manual and Protocol for Assessment, Scoring and Use]. English edn: Cox, W. M., 2009.
24. Schippers G. M., Broekman T. G., Buchholz A., Rutten R. Introducing a new assessment instrument: the Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE). Sucht 2009 55 : 209 218.
25. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) (Version 2.1).
26. Langenbucher J. W., Labouvie E., Martin C. S., Sanjuan P. M., Bavly L., Kirisci L. et al. An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. J Abnorm Psychol 2004 113 : 72 80.
27. Anton R. F., Moak D. H., Latham P. K. The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale: a new method of assessing outcome in alcoholism treatment studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996 53 : 225 231.
28. DeWildt W. A., Lehert P., Schippers G. M., Nakovics H., Mann K., van den Brink W. Investigating the structure of craving using structural equation modeling in analysis of the obsessive-compulsive drinking scale: a multinational study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005 29 : 509 516.
29. Lovibond P. F., Lovibond S. H. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, 2nd edn.
30. Lovibond P. F., Lovibond S. H. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995 33 : 335 343.
31. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 67 : 361 370.
32. Moran P., Leese M., Lee T., Walters P., Thornicroft G., Mann A. Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2003 183 : 228 232.
33. Marsden J., Gossop M., Stewart D., Best D., Farrell M., Lehmann P. et al. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. Addiction 1998 93 : 1857 1867.
34. Schippers G. M., Schramade M., Walburg J. A. Reforming Dutch substance abuse treatment services. Addict Behav 2002 27 : 995 1007.
35. Sobell M. B., Sobell L. Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000 68 : 573 579.
36. Van den Hoek J. A., Coutinho R. A., van Haastrecht H. J., van Zadelhoff A. W., Goudsmit J. Prevalence and risk factors of HIV infections among drug users and drug-using prostitutes in Amsterdam. AIDS 1988 2 : 55 60. Available at: http://www.amsterdamcohortstudies.org (accessed 18 December 2009).
37. World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHO QOL) Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998 28 : 551 558.
38. Murphy B., Herrman H., Hawthorne G., Pinzone T., Evert H. Australian WHOQOL Instruments: User's Manual and Interpretation Guide.
39. Arbuckle J. Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User's Guide.
40. Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979 86 : 420 427.
41. Buchholz A., Rist F., Küfner H., Kraus L. Die deutsche Version des Instruments Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): reliabilität, Validität und Anwendbarkeit [The German version of the instrument Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): reliability, validity, and feasibility]. Sucht 2009 55 : 219 242.
42. Küfner H., Buchholz A., Lindenmeyer J., Kraus L., Rist F. Änderungssensitivität und prognostische validität der MATE indizes [Sensitivity for change and prognostic validity of the MATE indices]. Sucht 2009 55 : 243 251.
43. Buchholz A., Schippers G. M., Broekman T. G. MATE Training Manual.