Personal learning environments on the social semantic web

Semantic Web

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 23-51

  Jeremić, Zoran ^a   Jovanović, Jelena ^a   Gašević, Dragan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Linked data; Ontologies; Project based learning; Semantic web; Social tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879867171     PISSN: 15700844     EISSN: 22104968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/SW-2012-0058     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Bridgman, P. (1922). Dimensional Analysis. Yale University Press.
2. Cohen, E. and Giacomo, P. (1987). Symbols, units, nomenclature and fundamental constants in physics. Physica, 146A:1-68.
3. Davenport, J. and Naylor, W. (2003). Units and dimensions in OpenMath. Technical report, OpenMath. Available at http: www.openmath.orgdocumentsUnits. pdf.
4. Foster, M. P. (2010). The next 50 years of the SI: a review of the opportunities for the e-Science age. Metrologica, 47(6).
5. Gruber, T. and Olsen, G. (1994). An ontology for engineering mathematics. In Doyle, J., Torasso, P., and Sandewall, E., editors, Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Bonn, Germany.
6. Hey, T., Tansley, S., and Tolle, K., editors (2009). The Fourth Paradigm -Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research. Available at http:research.microsoft. comen-uscollaborationfourthparadigm contents.aspx.
7. Isele, R., Jentzsch, A., and Bizer, C. (2010). Silk Server -Adding missing Links while consuming Linked Data. In Hartig, O., Harth, A., and Sequeda, J., editors, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data (COLD2010), volume 665. CEUR, Shanghai, China.
8. Leal, D. and Schröder, A. (2002). RDF vocabulary for physical properties, quantities and units. Technical report, ScadaOn-Web. Available at http:www.s-Ten.euscadaonweb NOTE-units2002-08-05NOTE-units.html.
9. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., and Oltramari, A. (2003). WonderWeb Deliverable D18. Technical report, Laboratory For Applied Ontology, Trento, Italy. Available at http:wonderweb.semanticweb.org deliverablesdocumentsD18.pdf.
10. NIST (2004). The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty, International System of Units (SI), Prefixes for binary multiples. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available at http:physics. nist.govcuuUnitsbinary.html.
11. Pinto, H. and Martins, J. (2001). Revising and extending the Units of Measure "subontology". In Proceedings of the Workshop IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, at IJCAI'2001. AAAI Press, Seattle, Washington.
12. Probst, F. (2008). Observations, Measurements and Semantic Reference Spaces. Journal of Applied Ontology, 3(1-2).
13. Raskin, R. and Pen, M. (2005). Knowledge representation in the Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET). Computers & Geosciences, 31:1119-1125.
14. Rijgersberg, H., Wigham, M., and Top, J. L. (2011). How semantics can improve engineering processes: A case of units of measure and quantities. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(2):276-287.
15. Roure, D. D., Goble, C., and Stevens, R. (2009). The design and realisation of the Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5):561 -567.
16. Schadow, G., McDonald, C., Suico, J., Fohring, U., and Tolxdorff, T. (1999). Units of measure in clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6(2):151-162.
17. Suppes, P., Krantz, D., Luce, R., and Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of Measurement. Academic Press, San Diego.
18. Suppes, P. and Zinnes, J. (1962). Basic measurement theory. Technical report, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Available at http:suppescorpus.stanford. edutechreportsIMSSS-45.pdf.
19. Taylor, B. N. (2008). Guide for the use of the International System of Units (SI). 2008 edn. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at http:physics. nist.govcuupdfsp811.pdf.
20. van Assem, M., Rijgersberg, H., Wigham, M., and Top, J. (2010). Converting and Annotating Quantitative Data Tables. In Patel-Schneider, P. F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J., Horrocks, I., and Glimm, B., editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, number 6496 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag.
21. W3C OWL Working Group (27 October 2009). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview. W3C Recommendation. Available at http:www.w3.orgTR owl2-overview.
22. W3C RDF Working Group (10 February 2004). RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation. Available at http:www.w3.org TRrdf-primer.
23. Weast, R., editor (1976). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio. rature, Educational Technology & Society, 7 (1), pp.12-20, (2004).
24. R.M. Carini, G.D. Kuh & S.P. Klein, Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages, Research in Higher Education, 47 (1), pp.1-32, San Diego, USA, (April 2006).
25. G. Attwell, The Personal Learning Environments -The future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1), (January 2007), Avail-Able at: http:www.elearningeuropa. infofilesmediamedia11561.pdf
26. A. Mikroyannidis, Toward a Social Semantic Web, IEEE Computer Society, Computer, 40 (11), pp.113-115, Califor-nia, USA, (October 2007).
27. T. Berners-Lee, Linked Data, W3C Design Issue, (July 2007), Available at: http:www.w3.orgDesignIssuesLinkedData.html
28. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler & O. Lassila, The Semantic Web, Scientific American, 284(5), pp.34-43, (May 2001).
29. D. Allemang & J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Morgan Kaufmann, (2008).
30. T. OReilly, What Is Web 2.0 -Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, (2005), Availa-ble at: http:www.oreillynet. compubaoreillytimnews20050930what-is-Web-20.html
31. T. Gruber, Collective Knowledge Systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web, Elsevier Science Publisher, Journal of Web Semantics, 6(1), pp. 4-13, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (February 2008).
32. J. Jovanovic, D. Gasevic, C.Torniai, S.Bateman & M.Hatala, The Social Semantic Web in Intelligent Learning Environ-ments -State of the Art and Future Challenges, Interactive Learning Environments, Special Issue: Web 2.0 for interac-Tive e-learning, 17(4), pp. 273-308, (December 2009).
33. T. Tiropanis, H. Davis, D. Millard & M. Weal, Semantic Technologies for Learning and Teaching in the Web 2.0 Era, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(6), pp.49-53, (2009).
34. A. Westerski, S. R. Kruk, K. Samp, T. Woroniecki, F. Czaja, & C. O'Nuallain., E-learning based on the social semantic in-formation sources, Proceedings of 1st Latin American confe-rence on Learning Objects, Guayaquil, Ecuador, (2006).
35. S. Auer, S. Dietzold, & T. Riechert, OntoWiki -A Tool for Social, Semantic Collaboration. Proceedings of the 5th Inter-national Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), pp. 736-749, Athens, GA, USA, (2006).
36. V. Zacharias, S. Braun & A. Schmidt, Social Semantic Bookmarking with SOBOLEO, In San Murugesan (eds.): Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0 and X.0: Technolo-gies, Business, and Social Applications, IGI Global, pp. 225-241, (2009).
37. S. Schaffert, D. Bischof, T. Bürger, A. Gruber, W. Hilzen-sauer & S. Schaffert, Learning with Semantic Wikis, In Pro-ceedings of the First Workshop on Semantic Wikis -From Wiki To Semantics, co-located with the 3rd Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2006), Budva, Montene-gro, (2006), Available at: http:www.salzburgresearch.atresearchgfxsemantic-wiki-elearning.pdf
38. S. Bajanki, K. Kaufhold, A. Le Bek, V. Dimitrova, L. Lau, R. ORourke & A. Walker, Use of Semantics to Build an Aca-demic Writing Community Environment, IOS Press, In Pro-ceeding of the 14th International Conference on Artificial in-Telligence in Education, 200, pp. 357-364, Brighton, UK, (2009).
39. J. Jovanovic, D. Gasevic, C. Brooks, V. Devedzic, M. Hatala, T. Eap & G. Richards, Using Semantic Web Technologies to Analyze Learning Content, IEEE Internet Computing, 11(5), pp. 45-53, (2007).
40. F. Wild, F. Mödritscher & S. Sigurdarson, Designing for Change : Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments, eLearn-ing Papers, pp. 1-15, (July 2008), Available at: http:www.elearningeuropa.infofilesmediamedia15972.pdf
41. M.A. Chatti, M. Jarke, Z. Wang & M. Specht, SMashup Personal Learning Environments, In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Mashup Personal Learn-ing Environments (MUPPLE09), ISSN 1613-0073, 506, Nice, France, (2009), http:ceur-ws.orgVol-506
42. S. Sire, E. Bogdanov, D. Gillet, M. Palmer, F. Wild, Intro-ducing qualitative dimensions to analyze the usefulness of Web 2.0 platforms as PLEs, International Journal of Tech-nology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), pp. 40 -60, (2011).
43. Z. Jeremic, J. Jovanovic, D. Gasevic, Semantic Web Tech-nologies for the Integration of Learning Tools and Context-Aware Educational Services, In Proceedings of the 8th Inter-national Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009), Semantic Web in Use Track, pp. 860-875, Washington, DC, USA, (2009).
44. M.A. Chatti, Anggraeni, M. Jarke, M. Specht & K. Maillet, PLEM: a Web 2.0 driven Long Tail aggregator and filter for e-learning, International Journal of Web Information Sys-Tems, 6(1), pp. 5-23, (2010).
45. F. Modritscher & F. Wild, Sharing Good Practice through Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments, Springer-Verlag, In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ad-vances in Web Based Learning (ICWL 009), pp. 245-254, Aachen, Germany, (2009),
46. H. Drachsler & D. Pecceu, Arts, T., Hutten, E., Rutledge, L., Van Rosmalen, P., Hummel, H.G.K., Koper, R.: ReMashed -Recommendations for Mash-Up Personal Learning Environ-ments. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.): Learn-ing in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, EC-TEL 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5794, Springer-Verlag, Nice, France, (2009).
47. E. Bogdanov, S. El Helou, D. Gillet, C. Salzmann & S. Sire, Graaasp: a web 2.0 research platform for contextual recom-mendation with aggregated data., Proceedings of the 28th In-Ternational Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sys-Tems, CHI 2010, Extended Abstracts Volume, pp. 3523-3528, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, (2010).
48. C. Clarke, A Resource List Management Tool for Undergra-duate Students based on Linked Open Data Priciples, Sprin-ger-Verlag, Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2009), pp. 697-707, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, (2009).
49. F. Abel, N. Henze, D. Krause & M. Kriesell, Semantic En-hancement of Social Tagging Systems. In V. Devedzic & D. Gasevic (eds.): Annals of Information Systems (Special Issue on Semantic Web and Web 2.0), 6(1), pp. 25-54, (2010).
50. I. Marenzi, R. Kupetz, W. Nejdl & S. Zerr, Supporting Active Learning in CLIL through Collaborative Search, In X.Luo, M. Spaniol, L. Wang, Q.Li, W. Nejdl & W. Zhang (eds.): Advances in Web-Based Learning, Proceedings of Interna-Tional Conference on Advances in Web-Based Learning, ICWL 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, pp.200-209, Shanghai, China, (December, 2010).
51. J. O'Connell, Creative Web 2.0 learning, A talk given at Christian Teacher Librarians Association conference, Syd-ney, (23 May 2007), Available at: http : www.slideshare.netheyjudeonlinecreative-web-20-learning
52. S. Downes, Learning networks in practice, In D. Ley (Ed.) Emerging technologies for learning, BECTA, 2, pp. 19-27, (2007), Available at: http:partners.becta.org.ukpage-documentsresearchemerging-Technologies07- chapter2.pdf
53. T.D. Anderson & D.R. Garrison, Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities, In C.C. Gibson (ed), Distance learning in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Madison, WI, Atwood Publishing, 1998, pp. 97-112, (1998)
54. J. Jovanovic, D. Gasevic, C. Torniai & V. Devedzic, Using 9Semantic Web Technologies to Provide Contextualized Feedback to Instructors, In Dicheva, D., Mizoguchi, R., Greer, J., (Eds.) Ontologies and Semantic Web for e-Learning, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (2009).
55. J. Jovanovic, C. Knight, D. Gasevic & G. Richards, Ontolo-gies for Effective Use of Context in e-Learning Settings. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), pp. 47-59, (2007).
56. F. Zablith, M. Fernandez & M. Rowe, The OU Linked Open Data: production and consumption. In Proceedings of Linked Learning 2011: 1st International Workshop on eLearning Approaches for the Linked Data Age, Proceeding 8th Ex-Tended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2011), CEUR 717, Heraklion, Greece, (May 2011). Available at:http:ceur-ws.orgVol-717paper1.pdf
57. L. Johnson, A. Levine, R. Smith & S. Stone, The 2010 Hori-zon Report, The New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas, USA, (2010), Available at: http:www.nmc.orgpdf2010-Horizon-Report.pdf
58. M. Sicilia, H. Ebner, S. Sanchez-Alonso, F. Alvarez, A. Abián & E. Garcia-Barriocanal, Navigating learning re-sources through linked data: a preliminary report on the re-design of Organic.Edunet. In Proceedings of Linked Learning 2011: 1st International Workshop on eLearning Approaches for the Linked Data Age at the 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2011), Heraklion, Greece (2011), Availa-ble at: http:ceur-ws.orgVol-717paper10.pdf
59. E. Kaldoudi, N. Dovrolis, D. Giordano & S. Dietze, Educa-Tional Resources as Social Objects in Semantic Social Net-works. In Proceedings of Linked Learning 2011: 1st Interna-Tional Workshop on eLearning Approaches for the Linked Data Age at the 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2011), Heraklion, Greece (2011), Available at: http:ceur-ws.orgVol-717paper11.pdf
60. F. Carmagnola, F. Osborne & I. Torre, User data distributed on the social web: how to identify users on different social systems and collecting data about them. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems (HetRec 10). ACM, pp. 9-15, New York, NY, USA, (2010).
61. J. Vassileva, Distributed User Modelling for Universal In-formation Access, In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in Human -Computer Interaction (UAHCI), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Inte-raction, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, 3, pp. 122-126, New Orleans, USA, (2001).
62. P. Brusilovsky, S.A. Sosnovsky & O. Shcherbinin, User Modeling in a Distributed E-Learning Architecture, Proceed-ings of the 10th International Conference, UM 2005, pp. 387-391 pp. 387-391, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, (July 2005),
63. Dolog, P. & Schäfer, M. (2005). A framework for browsing, manipulating and maintaining interoperable learner profiles. In L. AArdissono, P. Brna & A.Mitrovic (Eds.), User Model-ing 2005, In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 387-391 (2005).
64. D. Heckmann, T. Schwartz, B. Brandherm & A. Kröner, Decentralized User Modeling with UserML and GUMO, In P.Dolog & J.Vassileva (Eds.), Decentralized, Agent Based and Social Approaches to User Modeling, (DASUM 2005), pp. 61-65, Edinburgh, Scotland, (2005).
65. M. Rowe & F. Ciravegna, Getting to Me -Exporting Seman-Tic Social Network from Facebook, In J. Breslin, U. Bojars, A. Passant & S. Fernandez, Proceedings of the First Social Data on the Web Workshop, International Semantic Web Conference, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, 405, Karlsruhe, Germany, (October 2008), Available at: http:CEUR-WS.orgVol-405paper7.pdf
66. M. Stankovic, Modeling Online Presence, In J. Breslin, U. Bojars, A. Passant & S. Fernandez, Proceedings of the First Social Data on the Web Workshop, CEUR Workshop Pro-ceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, 405, Karlsruhe, Germany, (Octo-ber 2008), Available at: CEUR-WS.orgVol-405paper9.pdf
67. J. Jovanovic, D. Gasevic, M. Stankovic, Z. Jeremic & M. Siadaty, Online Presence in Adaptive Learning on the Social Semantic Web, In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Social Computing -Workshops (Workshop on Social Computing in Education), Vancouver, pp. 891-896, BC, Canada, (2009).
68. S.R. Kruk, S. Decker, A. Gzella, S. Grzonkowski & B. McDaniel, Social semantic collaborative filtering for digital libraries, Journal of Digital Information, Special Issue on Personalization, (2006).
69. S.R. Kruk, FOAF-Realm -control your friends' access to the resource. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the (Semantic) Web (FOAF Galway), pp.1-9, Galway, Ireland (September 2004), Availa-ble at: http:library.deri.ieresourcedbe66985
70. P. Bonatti, C. Duma, B.E. Fuchs, W. Nejdl, D. Olmedilla, J. Peer, & N. Shahmehri, Semantic Web Policies -A Discus-sion of Requirements and Research Issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, In Proceedings of the 3rd European Se-mantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006), Springer, 4011,pp. 712-724, Budva, Montenegro, (June 2006).
71. J.L. De Coi, P. Kärger, A.W. Koesling, & D. Olmedilla, Control your elearning environment: Exploiting policies in an open infrastructure for lifelong learning, in IEEE Transac-Tions on Learning Technologies, 1(1), pp 88-102, (March 2008).
72. S. Braun, A. Schmidt & C. Hentschel, Semantic Desktop Systems for Context Awareness -Requirements and Archi-Tectural Implications. In 1st Workshop on Architecture, De-sign, and Implementation of the Semantic Desktop, collo-cated with the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2007), Innsbruck, Austria, (2007).
73. M. Siadaty, C. Torniai, D. Gasevic, J. Jovanovic, T. Eap, M. Hatala, m-LOCO: An Ontology-based Framework for Con-Text-Aware Mobile Learning. Proceedings of the 6th Interna-Tional Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Web for Intel-ligent Educational Systems collocated with the 9th Interna-Tional Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada, (2008).
74. A. Schmidt, Ontology-Based User Context Management: The Challenges of Dynamics and Imperfection, In R. Meersman & Z. Tahiri (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Sys-Tems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4275, Springer, pp. 995-1011, (2006).
75. C. Ghidini, V. Pammer, P. Scheir, L. Serafini & S. Lindstaedt, APOSDLE: Learn@work with semantic web technology, In Proceedings of The Innovation Conference for Knowledge Management, New Media Technologies and Se-mantic Technologies (I-Know 07), pp.262-269 Graz, Austria, (September 2007).
76. IntelLEO D3.2, IntelLEO -Intelligent Learning Extended Organisation, Deliverable D3.2 Implementation Framework -First version (WP 300), 7th Framework Program Theme 3, Project no. FP7-ICT-231590, (2010).
77. S. Dietze, A. Gugliotta & J. Domingue, A Semantic Web Service oriented Framework for adaptive Learning Environ-ments, In E.Franconi, M. Kifer & W. May (Eds.), The Se-mantic Web: Research and Applications, Proceedings of 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 45192007, pp. 701-715, Innsbruck, Austria, (June 2007).
78. S. Harris & A. Seaborne, SPARQL 1.1 Query Language, W3C Working Draft, (October 2010), Available at: http:www.w3.orgTRsparql11-query
79. D. Degler, Semantic Web Interface Design: Opportunities and Techniques. Presentation at Semantic Technologies 2010 Conference, San Francisco, USA, (June 2010), Available at: http:designforcontext.compublicationsdd-design-semtech- 2010-06-22.pdf
80. C. Yeung, I. Liccardi, K. Lu, O. Seneviratne & T. Berners-Lee, Decentralization: The Future of Online Social Network-ing, W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking, (2009), Available at: http:www.w3. org200809msnwspapersdecentralization.pdf
81. B.J. Zimmerman, Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview, In Theory into Practice, Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 41(2), pp. 64-72, College of Education, The Ohio State Uni-versity, USA (2002).
82. M. Osterloch, Human resources management and knowledge creation, In K. Ichijo & I. Nonaka (Eds.) Knowledge creation and management. New challenges for managers. Oxford Uni-versity Press, pp. 158-175, (2007).
83. Z. Jeremic, J. Jovanovic & D. Gasevic, Towards a Semantic-rich Collaborative Environment for Learning Software Pat-Terns, In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL2008), Springer-Verlag, Maastricht, The Netherlands, pp.155-166, (2008).
84. G. Kearsley & B. Shneiderman, Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based learning and teaching, Edu-cational Technology, 38(5), pp.20-23, (1999), Available at http:home.sprynet.comgkearsleyengage.htm
85. M. Jazayeri, The Education of a Software Engineer, In the Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated software engineering, IEEE Computer Society, pp.18-xxvii, Washington, DC, USA, (2004).
86. L. Dodds & I. Davis, Linked Data Patterns, (2010), Available at: http:patterns.dataincubator.orgbook
87. S. Henninger, A Framework for Flexible and Executable Usability Patterns Standards, In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW '07), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 23-34, Washington, DC, USA, (2007).
88. Z. Jeremic, J. Jovanovic & D. Gasevic, An Environment for Project-based Collaborative Learning of Software Design Patterns, International Journal on Engineering Education, 27(1), pp. 41-51, (2011).
89. J. C. Richardson & K. Swan, Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students perceived learning and satisfaction, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Net-works,7(1), pp. 68-88, (February 2003).
90. C.D. Manning, P. Raghavan, H. Schütze, Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, (2008).
91. D. Gasevic, A. Zouaq, C. Torniai, J. Jovanovic & M. Hatala, An Approach to Folksonomy-based Ontology Maintenance for Learning Environments, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, IEEE Computer Society, 99(1), Los Alamitos, CA, USA, (2011).
92. S. Bateman, R. Farzan, P. Brusilovsky & G. McCalla. OATS: The Open Annotation and Tagging System. In the Proceed-ings of the Third Annual International Scientific Conference of the Learning Object Repository Research Network, Mon-Treal, Canada (November 2006).
93. J. Frechtling, H. Frierson, S. Hood & G. Hughes, The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation, NSF 02-057, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA http:www.nsf.govpubs2002nsf02057
94. V. Dimitrova, Social Linked Data and Experiential Learning: Opportunities and Challenges, Keynote speech at Linked Learning 2011: 1st International Workshop on eLearning Approaches for the Linked Data Age, 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2011), Heraklion, Greece, (2011), Slides Available at: http:stefandietze.files.wordpress.com201105ll-eswc-2011-vania-last.pdf
95. D.R. Garrison, T. Anderson & W. Archer, Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), pp.87-105, (2000).
96. P.R. Pintrich, C.A. Wolters & G.P. Baxter, Assessing meta-cognition and self-regulated learning, G. Schraw, J.C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition, pp. 43-97, Lincoln, NE, Buros Institute of Mental Measurement, (2000).