Erratum to: Engineering redox cofactor utilization for detoxification of glycolaldehyde, a key inhibitor of bioethanol production, in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2013) 97, (6589-6600) DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4997-4);Engineering redox cofactor utilization for detoxification of glycolaldehyde, a key inhibitor of bioethanol production, in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 97, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 6589-6600

  Jayakody, Lahiru N ^a,b   Horie, Kenta ^a   Hayashi, Nobuyuki ^a,b   Kitagaki, Hiroshi ^a,b  

^a SAGA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KAGOSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Glycolaldehyde; Gre2; Redox cofactors; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL; DETOXIFICATION; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; FERMENTATION; GENE ENCODING; SIGNAL ENCODING; WATER TREATMENT;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; FERMENTATION INHIBITORS; GLYCOLALDEHYDES; GRE2; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE PATHWAY; REDOX COFACTORS; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

YEAST;

ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; CARBON; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; GLYCOLALDEHYDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALDEHYDE; BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INHIBITOR; LIGNIN; REDOX POTENTIAL; WATER TREATMENT; YEAST;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CARBON METABOLISM; CELL LYSATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC CODE; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UPREGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84879845922     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: 14320614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5879-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2007) Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biot 82:340-349
2. Almeida JRM, Röder A, Modig T, Laadan B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2008) NADH- vs NADPH-coupled reduction of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) and its implications on product distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:939-945
3. Bruinenberg PM, Van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA (1983) A theoretical analysis of NADPH production and consumption in yeasts. J Gen Microbiol 129:953-964
4. Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Lopez Contreras AM, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, de Vries SS, Weusthuis RA (1999) Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:741-755
5. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S (2012) A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 14:366-379
6. Chen CN, Porubleva L, Shearer G, Svrakic M, Holden LG, Dover JL, Johnston M, Chitnis PR, Kohl DH (2003) Associating protein activities with their genes: rapid identification of a gene encoding a methylglyoxal reductase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20:545-554
7. Costenoble R, Valadi H, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Franzén CJ (2000) Micro aerobic glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16:483-495
8. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (2007) High-efficient yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:31-34
9. Grabowska D, Chelstowska A (2003) The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem 278:13984-13988
10. Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U (2009) Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxidoreductases. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7631-7638
11. Horvath IS, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Liden G (2001) Effects of furfural on anaerobic continuous cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 75:540-549
12. Hu F, Ragauskas A (2012) Pretreatment and lignocellulosic chemistry. Bioenergy Res 5:1043-1066
13. Jayakody LN, Hayashi N, Kitagaki H (2011) Identification of glycolaldehyde as the key inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation by yeast and genome-wide analysis of its toxicity. Biotechnol Lett 33:285-292
14. Jayakody LN, Horie K, Hayashi N, Kitagaki H (2012) Improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to hot-compressed water treated cellulose by expression of ADH1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:273-283
15. Ehara K, Saka S (2002) A comparative study on chemical conversion of cellulose between the batch-type and flow-type systems in supercritical water. Cellulose 9:301-311
16. Katz M, Frejd T, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2003) Efficient anaerobic whole cell stereoselective bioreduction with recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:573-582
17. Kitagaki H, Cowart LA, Matmati N, Montefusco D, Gandy J, de Avalos SV, Novgorodov SA, Zheng J, Obeid LM, Hannun YA (2009) ISC1-dependent metabolic adaptation reveals an indispensable role for mitochondria in induction of nuclear genes during the diauxic shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 284:10818-10830
18. Kohrer K, Domdey H (1991) Preparation of high molecular weight RNA. Methods Enzymol 194:398-405
19. Krantz M, Nordlander B, Valadi H, Johansson M, Gustafsson L, Hohmann S (2004) Anaerobicity prepares Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for faster adaptation to osmotic shock. Eukaryot Cell 3:1381-1390
20. Liu ZL (2011) Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:809-825
21. Liu ZL, Moon JA (2009) novel NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-12632 involved in the detoxification of aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Gene 446:1-10
22. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ (2006) Transcriptome dynamics of ethanologenic yeast in response to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural stress related to biomass conversion to ethanol. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Recent research developments in multidisciplinary applied microbiology: understanding and exploiting microbes and their interactions-biological, physical, chemical and engineering aspects. Wiley, New York, pp 679-668
23. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Gorsich S (2005) Enhanced biotransformation of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by newly developed ethanologenic yeast strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124:451-460
24. T method. Methods 25:402-408
25. Lu X, Yamauchi K, Phaiiboonsilpa N, Saka S (2009) Two-step hydrolysis of Japanese beech as treated by semi-flow hot-compressed water. J Wood Sci 55:367-375
26. Moon J, Liu ZL (2012) Engineered NADH-dependent GRE2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by directed enzyme evolution enhances hmf reduction using additional cofactor NADPH. Enzyme Microbial Technol 50:115-120
27. Naik SN, Vaibhav VG, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:578-597
28. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J (2000) Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng 2:69-77
29. Olsson L, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1993) Fermentative performance of bacteria and yeasts in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Process Biochem 28:249-257
30. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technol 74:25-33
31. Petersson A, Almeida JRM, Modig T, Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G (2006) A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 6:455-464
32. Rep M, Proft M, Remize F, Tamas M, Serrano R, Thevelein JM (2001) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sko1p transcription factor mediates HOG pathway-dependent osmotic regulation of a set of genes encoding enzymes implicated in protection from oxidative damage. Mol Microbiol 40:1067-1083
33. Roca C, Nielsen J, Olsson L (2003) Metabolic engineering of ammonium assimilation in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4732-4736
34. Rodrigues-Pousada C, Menezes RA, Pimentel C (2010) The Yap family and its role in stress response. Yeast 27:245-258
35. +-dependent Ald6p and Ald5p isoforms play a major role in acetate formation. Microbiology 150:2209-2220
36. Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresource Technol 110:1570-1580
37. Sonderegger M, Schumperli M, Sauer U (2004) Metabolic engineering of a phosphoketolase pathway for pentose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2892-2897
38. Van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, Van Den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MAH, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2006) Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 90:391-418
39. Van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA (1986) Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 32:199-224
40. Vemuri GN, Eiteman MA, McEwen JE, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2007) Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2402-2407
41. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Dijken JP (1990) Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol 136:395-403
42. Yang B, Wyman CE (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2:26-40
43. Yu Y, Lou X, Wu H (2007) Some recent advances in hydrolysis of biomass in hot compressed water and its comparison with other hydrolysis methods. Energy Fuels 22:46-60
44. Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L (2001) Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:17-34