Perception in a social context: Attention for response-functional means

Social Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 301-314

  Faber, Tim W ^a   Jonas, Kai J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879807706     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.301     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & De Vries, P. (2001). The psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 631-642. doi:10.1348/000712601162383 (Pubitemid 33602737)
2. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.71.2.230 (Pubitemid 126418535)
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609. doi:10.1.1.4.5511 (Pubitemid 29526169)
4. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323 (Pubitemid 33680154)
5. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603-8 (Pubitemid 37195264)
6. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
7. Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., Hagiwara, N., Navarrete, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1311-1317. doi:10.1177/0956797610378685
8. Cesario, J., Plaks. J. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 893-910. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.893 (Pubitemid 44100248)
9. Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
10. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1314
11. Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Goyle, A. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with secondary threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184-189. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010. 08.017
12. Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 455-470. doi:10.3758/ BF03195475
13. Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889
14. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003. 09.006 (Pubitemid 37324734)
15. Henderson, J. M. (2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 219-222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00507.x
16. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. doi: 10.1007/ s00426-009-0234-2 (Pubitemid 34965924)
17. Jonas, K. J., & Sassenberg, K. (2006). Knowing how to react: Automatic response priming from social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 709-721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90. 5.709 (Pubitemid 43911585)
18. Leder, H., Tinio, P. P., Fuchs, I. M., & Bohrn, I. (2010). When attractiveness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1858-1871. doi:10.1080/17470211003605142
19. Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868-896. doi:10.2307/2769418
20. Loftus, E. F. Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about "weapon focus." Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62. doi:10.1007/BF01044839 (Pubitemid 17030949)
21. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832-840. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575 (Pubitemid 41350579)
22. Molenkamp, B. (2010). UvA faceLAB IEyeTracker2 interface for Presentation (Version 1.1) [Software]. Available from http://www.fmg.uva.nl/top/home.cfm.
23. Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of theoretical Biology, 47, 223-243. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011. 03.031
24. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181 (Pubitemid 33594908)
25. Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., & Koch, I. (2009). Cognition and action. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 35-71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Rayner, K., Smith, T. J., Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception. Psychological Science, 20, 6-10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02243.x
27. Seeing Machines. (2009). faceLAB (Version 5) [Hardware and software]. Available from www.seeingmachines.com.
28. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 132-135. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8721.2007.00490.x
29. Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81-88. doi:10.1080/01638539909545070
30. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162