Attaching to spindles before they form: Do early incorrect chromosome-microtubule attachments promote meiotic segregation fidelity?

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 2011-2015

  Meyer, Régis E ^a   Dawson, Dean S ^a,b  

^a OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Centrosome; Kinetochore; Re orientation; Spindle asymmetry; Spindle pole body

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION; CELL BUDDING; CELL MATURATION; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DAUGHTER CELL; DIPLOIDY; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SPINDLE POLE BODY; YEAST;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84879772054     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.25252     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Nagaoka SI, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an ageold problem. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:493-504; PMID:22705668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3245
2. King RW. When 2+2=5: the origins and fates of aneuploid and tetraploid cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1786:4-14; PMID:18703117
3. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore- microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:33-46; PMID:18097444; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2310
4. Westermann S, Drubin DG, Barnes G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2007; 76:563-91; PMID:17362199; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.160607
5. Neumüller RA, Knoblich JA. Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2675-99; PMID:19952104; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1850809
6. Pereira G, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J 2001; 20:6359-70; PMID:11707407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.22.6359
7. Gordon O, Taxis C, Keller PJ, Benjak A, Stelzer EH, Simchen G, et al. Nud1p, the yeast homolog of Centriolin, regulates spindle pole body inheritance in meiosis. EMBO J 2006; 25:3856-68; PMID:16888627; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ sj.emboj.7601254
8. Meyer RE, Kim S, Obeso D, Straight PD, Winey M, Dawson DS. Mps1 and Ipl1/Aurora B act sequentially to correctly orient chromosomes on the meiotic spindle of budding yeast. Science 2013; 339:1071-4; PMID:23371552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1232518
9. Segal M, Bloom K. Control of spindle polarity and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11:160-6; PMID:11306295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(01)01954-7
10. Byers B, Goetsch L. Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1974; 38:123-31; PMID:4598635; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1974.038.01.016
11. Byers B, Goetsch L. Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1975; 124:511-23; PMID:1100612
12. Guacci V, Hogan E, Koshland D. Centromere position in budding yeast: evidence for anaphase A. Mol Biol Cell 1997; 8:957-72; PMID:9201708
13. Jin Q, Trelles-Sticken E, Scherthan H, Loidl J. Yeast nuclei display prominent centromere clustering that is reduced in nondividing cells and in meiotic prophase. J Cell Biol 1998; 141:21-9; PMID:9531545; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.141.1.21
14. Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, Pereira G, Galova M, Schiebel E, et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 2002; 108:317-29; PMID:11853667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00633-5
15. Winey M, O'Toole ET. The spindle cycle in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:E23-7; PMID:11146646; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35050663
16. Kitamura E, Tanaka K, Kitamura Y, Tanaka TU. Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 2007; 21:3319-30; PMID:18079178; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.449407
17. Tanaka TU. Chromosome bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:581-9; PMID:15897181; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2004.1612
18. Maure JF, Kitamura E, Tanaka TU. Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol 2007; 17:2175-82; PMID:18060784; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.032
19. Lim HH, Zhang T, Surana U. Regulation of centrosome separation in yeast and vertebrates: common threads. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:325-33; PMID:19576775; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.008
20. Tajbakhsh S, Gonzalez C. Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:804-10; PMID:19851338; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2784
21. Bajer A, Molè-Bajer J. Lateral movements in the spindle and the mechanism of mitosis. Soc Gen Physiol Ser 1975; 30:77-98; PMID:1188417
22. Rattner JB, Berns MW. Centriole behavior in early mitosis of rat kangaroo cells (PTK2). Chromosoma 1976; 54:387-95; PMID:1253644; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/BF00292817
23. Salmon ED, Cimini D, Cameron LA, DeLuca JG. Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:553-68; PMID:15897180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1610
24. Cimini D, Moree B, Canman JC, Salmon ED. Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:4213-25; PMID:12953065; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00716
25. Kaseda K, McAinsh AD, Cross RA. Dual pathway spindle assembly increases both the speed and the fidelity of mitosis. Biol Open 2012; 1:12-8; PMID:23213363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.2011012
26. Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Paul R, Mogilner A, Cimini D. Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation. Mol Biol Cell 2012; 23:401-11; PMID:22130796; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0095
27. Hayashi A, Ogawa H, Kohno K, Gasser SM, Hiraoka Y. Meiotic behaviours of chromosomes and microtubules in budding yeast: relocalization of centromeres and telomeres during meiotic prophase. Genes Cells 1998; 3:587-601; PMID:9813109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00215.x
28. Alani E, Padmore R, Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 1990; 61:419-36; PMID:2185891; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0092-8674(90)90524-I
29. Moens PB, Rapport E. Spindles, spindle plaques, and meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hansen). J Cell Biol 1971; 50:344-61; PMID:5112645; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.50.2.344
30. Xu L, Ajimura M, Padmore R, Klein C, Kleckner N. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6572-81; PMID:8524222
31. Hochwagen A, Amon A. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol 2006; 16:R217-28; PMID:16546077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.009
32. Goetsch L, Byers B. Meiotic cytology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in protoplast lysates. Mol Gen Genet 1982; 187:54-60; PMID:6761545; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00384383
33. Taxis C, Keller P, Kavagiou Z, Jensen LJ, Colombelli J, Bork P, et al. Spore number control and breeding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key role for a self-organizing system. J Cell Biol 2005; 171:627-40; PMID:16286509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200507168
34. Piel M, Meyer P, Khodjakov A, Rieder CL, Bornens M. The respective contributions of the mother and daughter centrioles to centrosome activity and behavior in vertebrate cells. J Cell Biol 2000; 149:317-30; PMID:10769025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.2.317
35. Goshima G, Scholey JM. Control of mitotic spindle length. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010; 26:21-57; PMID:20604709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev- cellbio-100109-104006
36. Goshima G, Saitoh S, Yanagida M. Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 1999; 13:1664-77; PMID:10398680; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.13.1664
37. Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 2000; 289:300-3; PMID:10894778; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.300